Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 1995) (5)
- Constitutions (5)
- Federal (5)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Due Process (3)
-
- New York (3)
- (Decided October 31 (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Due Process Clause (2)
- Due process (2)
- Miranda warnings (2)
- New York State (2)
- Second Department (2)
- (Decided April 24 (1)
- (Decided January 6 (1)
- (decided (1)
- American criminal justice system (1)
- Appellate Division (1)
- Appellate Division Second Department (1)
- Assistant state attorneys general (1)
- August 14 (1)
- Baldi (1)
- Blackburn (1)
- Booth (1)
- Brady material (1)
- CPL 380.50(2)(b) (1)
- Capital sentencing (1)
- Cass Sunstein (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin
Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin
Robert Bloom
No abstract provided.
Innocence, Privacy, And Targeting In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Sherry F. Colb
Innocence, Privacy, And Targeting In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Sherry F. Colb
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler
A Peculiar Privilege In Historical Perspective: The Right To Remain Silent, Albert W. Alschuler
Michigan Law Review
Supreme Court decisions have vacillated between two incompatible readings of the Fifth Amendment guarantee that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." The Court sometimes sees this language as affording defendants and suspects a right to remain silent. This interpretation - a view that countless repetitions of the Miranda warnings have impressed upon the public - asserts that government officials have no legitimate claim to testimonial evidence tending to incriminate the person who possesses it. Although officials need not encourage a suspect to remain silent, they must remain at least neutral toward …
Constitutional Criminal Procedure, James P. Fleissner
Constitutional Criminal Procedure, James P. Fleissner
Mercer Law Review
This Article surveys significant 1995 decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the field commonly referred to as "Constitutional Criminal Procedure." The primary focus of this branch of criminal procedure is on the interpretation of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution. In selecting notable cases from 1995, the author looked for important interpretations of legal tests, rulings in cases of first impression, and opinions on close or controversial questions. I have endeavored to provide criminal practitioners with a useful "briefing" on recent significant developments in the Eleventh Circuit. Furthermore, I hope …
Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White
Criminal Procedure—Good Faith, Big Brother, And You: The United States Supreme Court's Latest Good Faith Exception To The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule. Arizona V. Evans, 115 S. Ct. 1185 (1995)., Elisa Masterson White
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff
Constitutional Law—Twelve Angry People. Arkansas Constitution Guarantees Right To Trial By Jury Of Twelve Persons In Criminal Cases. Byrd V. State, 317 Ark. 609, 879 S.W.2d 435 (1994)., Timothy N. Holthoff
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
(Adapted by permission from 84 Ky. L. J. 107 (1995)) This article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessiveness regarding prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportional to the crime punished. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, one finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is …
The Conundrum Of Corporate Liability: Seeking A Consistent Approach To The Constitutional Rights Of Corporations In Criminal Prosecutions, Peter J. Henning
The Conundrum Of Corporate Liability: Seeking A Consistent Approach To The Constitutional Rights Of Corporations In Criminal Prosecutions, Peter J. Henning
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Specific Agreements About Race: A Response To Professor Sunstein, Sheri Johnson
Specific Agreements About Race: A Response To Professor Sunstein, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Clipper Chip Proposal: Deciphering The Unfounded Fears That Are Wrongfully Derailing Its Implementation, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (1996), Howard S. Dakoff
The Clipper Chip Proposal: Deciphering The Unfounded Fears That Are Wrongfully Derailing Its Implementation, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 475 (1996), Howard S. Dakoff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Reform Of Habeas Corpus: The Advocates' Lament, Christopher E. Smith
Judicial Reform Of Habeas Corpus: The Advocates' Lament, Christopher E. Smith
Cleveland State Law Review
The U. S. Supreme Court has engineered significant changes in habeas corpus procedures. Any change in law or public policy has consequences for the human beings whose lives come into contact with the changed law or policy. Critics have accused the Rehnquist Court of "dismantling access to federal habeas corpus review guaranteed by statute since 1867." As a result, concerns have emerged regarding the consequences for potential petitioners whose claims can no longer be reviewed by federal judges. While the fate of death row inmates is the most important consequence of habeas corpus reform, anecdotal reports on these controversial cases …
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
The Death Penalty And The Interstate Agreement On Detainers Act: A Proposal For Change, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1996), Edward G. Hild
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm
New Federalism And Constitutional Criminal Procedure: Are We Repeating The Mistakes Of The Past?, James W. Diehm
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punishment And Procedure: A Different View Of The American Criminal Justice System, William T. Pizzi
Punishment And Procedure: A Different View Of The American Criminal Justice System, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin
Criminal Procedure: Examples And Expanations, Robert Bloom, Mark Brodin
Robert M. Bloom
No abstract provided.