Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (44)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
-
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- 1995) (37)
- Constitutions (37)
- Federal (36)
- New York (33)
- Supreme Court (27)
-
- New York State constitution (24)
- (decided (14)
- Appellate Division (11)
- Court of Appeals (9)
- Right to Counsel (8)
- Second Department (8)
- New York State (7)
- Due Process (6)
- Freedom of Speech and Press (6)
- Due Process Clause (5)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- New York County (5)
- Sixth amendment (5)
- Third Department (5)
- Article I (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Double jeopardy (4)
- Due process (4)
- First amendment (4)
- Fourteenth amendment (4)
- Fourth Amendment (4)
- Searches and Seizures (4)
- Self-incrimination (4)
- Sixth Amendment (4)
- Civil forfeiture (3)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 62
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Five Supreme Court Constitutions: Race-Based Scrutiny Past, Present, And Future, David Zimmerman
Five Supreme Court Constitutions: Race-Based Scrutiny Past, Present, And Future, David Zimmerman
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
A Constitutional Bibliography, Thomas E. Baker
A Constitutional Bibliography, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Romer V. Evans And The Constitutionality Of Higher Lawmaking, Anthony M. Dillof
Romer V. Evans And The Constitutionality Of Higher Lawmaking, Anthony M. Dillof
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The Sounds Of Silence: Charter Application When The Legislature Declines To Speak, Dianne Pothier
The Sounds Of Silence: Charter Application When The Legislature Declines To Speak, Dianne Pothier
Dianne Pothier Collection
On first impression, the title of the Simon and Garfunkle hit classic hit "The Sounds of Silence" may seem like an oxymoron. But it does not take too much reflection to realize that silence can indeed be very expressive and therefore quite telling. While that can be true in any number of contexts, for the specific purpose of this article, I will examine only one: legislative silence. What is the legal significance of the legislature declining to speak on one particular aspect of a legal issue otherwise addressed in the legislation? More specifically, can the Charter be engaged to challenge …
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
To Accomplish Fairness And Justice: Substantive Due Process, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1996), James W. Hilliard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preface: Double Jeopardy In Washington And Beyond, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Preface: Double Jeopardy In Washington And Beyond, Justice Philip A. Talmadge
Seattle University Law Review
The prohibition against double jeopardy is of ancient lineage in western civilization. In a ringing and scholarly dissent that rewards reflection, Justice Hugo Black said:
Fear and abhorrence of governmental power to try people twice for the same conduct is one of the oldest ideas found in western civilization. Its roots run deep into Greek and Roman times. Even in the Dark Ages, when so many other principles of justice were lost, the idea that one trial and one punishment were enough remained alive through the canon law and the teachings of the early Christian writers. By the thirteenth century …
Direct Democracy And Hastily Enacted Statutes, John C. Nagle
Direct Democracy And Hastily Enacted Statutes, John C. Nagle
Journal Articles
Phil Frickey qualifies as the leading explorer of the borderline between statutory interpretation and constitutional law. Frickey explores ways to mediate the borderline between statutory interpretation and constitutional adjudication in the context of direct democracy. His is an enormously helpful attempt to reconcile the constitutional issues discussed by Julian Eule and the statutory interpretation issues discussed by Jane Schacter. I agree with many of Frickey's suggestions. Indeed, I will suggest some additional devices that can perform the same role. But I wonder whether Frickey has proved more than he set out to accomplish. The problems of direct democracy are special, …