Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- 634 F. Supp.2d 897 (1)
- 8th Amendment (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Baxter v. United States (1)
-
- Carlson v. Landon (1)
- Colombian Constitutional Court (1)
- Comparative public law (1)
- Constitutional amendment (1)
- Corte Constitucional colombiana (1)
- Darnel's Case (1)
- Derecho público comparado (1)
- Effective representation (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Incorporation doctrine (1)
- Individual liberties (1)
- Judicial role (1)
- Legislative substitution (1)
- Papel de los jueces (1)
- Partidos políticos (1)
- Police discretion (1)
- Political parties (1)
- Pre-trial detention (1)
- Rights (1)
- Rule 702 (1)
- Salerno (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Contingent Constitutionalism: State And Local Criminal Laws And The Applicability Of Federal Constitutional Rights, Wayne A. Logan
Contingent Constitutionalism: State And Local Criminal Laws And The Applicability Of Federal Constitutional Rights, Wayne A. Logan
Scholarly Publications
Americans have long been bound by a shared sense of constitutional commonality, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned the notion that federal constitutional rights should be allowed to depend on distinct state and local legal norms. In reality, however, federal rights do indeed vary, and they do so as a result of their contingent relationship to the diversity of state and local laws on which they rely. Focusing on criminal procedure rights in particular, this Article examines the benefits and detriments of constitutional contingency, and casts in new light many enduring understandings of American constitutionalism, including the effects of …
Reasonableness As A Rule: A Paean To Justice O'Connor's Dissent In Atwater V. City Of Lago Vista, Wayne A. Logan
Reasonableness As A Rule: A Paean To Justice O'Connor's Dissent In Atwater V. City Of Lago Vista, Wayne A. Logan
Scholarly Publications
This paper, part of a symposium dedicated to “great” Fourth Amendment dissents, examines Justice Sandra Day O’Connor's dissent in Atwater v. City of Lago Vista (2001), where by a 5-4 vote the Court upheld the constitutionality of warrantless police arrests for non-breach of the peace, fine-only offenses. In addition to rightfully condemning the majority's decision to equate probable cause with constitutional reasonableness, in principle, Justice O’Connor presciently recognized the numerous liberty and privacy-restricting consequences of the outcome for the “everyday lives of Americans.” Atwater, combined with decisions issued before and after it, including Whren v. United States, Devenpeck …
The Sixth Amendment And Expert Witnesses In Criminal Tax Cases, Steve R. Johnson
The Sixth Amendment And Expert Witnesses In Criminal Tax Cases, Steve R. Johnson
Scholarly Publications
Recently, in the Baxter case, a federal district court vacated the sentence imposed as a result of a guilty plea in a criminal tax case. The court held that the failure of defense counsel to retain the services of an expert in tax crimes sentencing violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to effective representation.
This installment of the Tax Crimes column explores Baxter. Part A briefly notes the civil and criminal tax contexts in which tax experts are used. Part B describes Baxter and its holding. Part C asks whether defense counsel in criminal tax cases should always retain a …
Political Institutions And Judicial Role: An Approach In Context, The Case Of The Colombian Constitutional Court, David Landau, Julián Daniel López-Murcia
Political Institutions And Judicial Role: An Approach In Context, The Case Of The Colombian Constitutional Court, David Landau, Julián Daniel López-Murcia
Scholarly Publications
Comparative constitutional law scholarship has largely ignored political institutions. It has therefore failed to realize that radical differences in the configuration of political institutions should bear upon the way courts do their jobs. Parting from a case study of the Colombian Constitutional Court, this paper develops a theory of judicial role focused on political context, and particularly on party systems. Colombian parties are unstable and poorly tied to civil society, therefore Congress has difficulty initiating and monitoring the enforcement of policy, as well as checking presidential power. For that reason, the Constitutional Court has responded by taking many of these …
Discrimination, Coercion, And The Bail Reform Act Of 1984: The Loss Of The Core Constitutional Protections Of The Excessive Bail Clause, Samuel R. Wiseman
Discrimination, Coercion, And The Bail Reform Act Of 1984: The Loss Of The Core Constitutional Protections Of The Excessive Bail Clause, Samuel R. Wiseman
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Ways To Change: A Reevaluation Of Article V Campaigns And Legislative Consitutionalism, Mary Ziegler
Ways To Change: A Reevaluation Of Article V Campaigns And Legislative Consitutionalism, Mary Ziegler
Scholarly Publications
Recent scholarship has convincingly shown that social movements shape constitutional law, and vice versa. To date, most theories study alternatives to formal constitutional amendments or consider the proper role for the courts in influencing the development of social movements. In this Article, however, I approach the question of constitutional change from the standpoint of social movements that oppose a constitutional decision. What tools are available to a movement seeking to change the meaning of a decision? What are the advantages or disadvantages of pursuing an Article V amendment, of codifying a favorable constitutional interpretation by statute, or beginning a litigation …