Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Martha Fineman (4)
- Adaption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (2)
- Adoption and Safe FamiliesA ct (2)
- Compensation Clause (2)
- Egalitarianism (2)
-
- Family law (2)
- Feminism theory (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Foster care system (2)
- Lochner v. New York (2)
- Moral argument (2)
- Payments in foster care (2)
- Poverty law (2)
- Progressive takings doctrine (2)
- Public assistance (2)
- Social responsibility (2)
- Strict proportionality (2)
- Takings law (2)
- Collective action (1)
- Dagan (Hanoch) (1)
- Dames & Moore v. Regan (1)
- Distributive justice (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Lunney (Glynn) (1)
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1)
- Public choice analysis (1)
- Rough reciprocity of advantage (1)
- Shanghai Power v. United States (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Just Compensation, Incentives, And Social Meanings, Hanoch Dagan
Just Compensation, Incentives, And Social Meanings, Hanoch Dagan
Michigan Law Review
In Takings and Distributive Justice, I proposed a progressive interpretation of the Compensation Clause. In his response, published in this issue, Professor Lunney challenges the plausibility and the desirability of my interpretation and proposes an alternative. This Essay compares our approaches. It concludes that Professor Lunney's careful examination of the public choice analysis of takings does refine my theory. Contrary to Professor Lunney's claims, however, these refinements reinforce - rather than undermine - the viability of a progressive takings doctrine. Parts I and II set the stage by summarizing the principal claims made, respectively, in my original Article and in …
Takings, Efficiency, And Distributive Justice: A Response To Professor Dagan, Glynn S. Lunney Jr.
Takings, Efficiency, And Distributive Justice: A Response To Professor Dagan, Glynn S. Lunney Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In A Critical Reexamination of the Takings Jurisprudence, I addressed an efficiency problem that arises when the government attempts to change property rights in a manner that burdens a very few for the benefit of the very many. Specifically, in the absence of compensation, the collective action advantage of the few in organizing to oppose the proposed measure will often give them a decided edge against the many. As a result of that advantage, the few will too often be able to persuade the legislature not to act, even when an objective evaluation of the proposal's costs and benefits would …
Building On Foundational Myths: Feminism And The Recovery Of "Human Nature": A Response To Martha Fineman , Peter M. Cicchino
Building On Foundational Myths: Feminism And The Recovery Of "Human Nature": A Response To Martha Fineman , Peter M. Cicchino
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Subsidy For Caretaking In Families: Lessons From Foster Care , Catharine J. Ross, Naomi R. Cahn
Subsidy For Caretaking In Families: Lessons From Foster Care , Catharine J. Ross, Naomi R. Cahn
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Building On Foundational Myths: Feminism And The Recovery Of "Human Nature": A Response To Martha Fineman , Peter M. Cicchino
Building On Foundational Myths: Feminism And The Recovery Of "Human Nature": A Response To Martha Fineman , Peter M. Cicchino
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Subsidy For Caretaking In Families: Lessons From Foster Care , Catharine J. Ross, Naomi R. Cahn
Subsidy For Caretaking In Families: Lessons From Foster Care , Catharine J. Ross, Naomi R. Cahn
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.