Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (11)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- University of Richmond (5)
- BLR (3)
- Selected Works (3)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Corte Suprema de la República Argentina (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Judges (7)
- Courts (6)
- Jurisprudence (5)
-
- Constitutional law (3)
- General Law (3)
- Separation of powers (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Independence (2)
- Judicial power (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- "advice and consent" (1)
- Abolition (1)
- Ambiguity (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Anti-tax (1)
- Appropriation (1)
- Article III (1)
- Badges and incidents of slavery (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Bioethics and Law (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Buckley v. Valeo (1)
- Publication
-
- Horacio M. LYNCH (8)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- ExpressO (3)
-
- Hou Meng (3)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (3)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Charles H. Baron (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Linda L. Berger (1)
- Michael R Dimino (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Testimony Before Congress (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 46
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
The Function Of The Supreme People’S Court Of Regulating Economy——Re-Evaluation Of The Zhongfu Industry Guarantee Case(最高法院规制经济的功能──再评“中福实业公司担保案”), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court Regulates Economy: Review On Exterior Coordination Cost(最高人民法院如何规制经济──外部协调成本的考察), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Judges As Rulemakers, Larry A. Alexander, Emily Sherwin
Judges As Rulemakers, Larry A. Alexander, Emily Sherwin
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This essay analyzes and compares different approaches to the problem of legal precedent. If judges reasoned flawlessly, the ideal approach to precedent would give prior judicial opinions only the weight they naturally carry in moral reasoning. Given that judges are not perfect reasoners, the best approach to precedent is one that treats rules established in prior decisions as authoritative for later judges. In comparison to the natural model of precedent, a rule-based model minimizes error. A rule-based model is also superior to several popular attempts at compromise, which call on judges to reason from the results of prior cases or …
Strategic Judicial Lawmaking: An Empirical Investigation Of Ideology And Publication On The U.S. Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, David S. Law
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Previous studies have demonstrated that, in a number of contexts, federal appeals court judges divide along ideological lines when deciding cases upon the merits. To date, however, researchers have failed to find evidence that circuit judges take advantage of selective publication rules to further their ideological preferences - for example, by voting more ideologically in published cases that have precedential effect than in unpublished cases that lack binding effect upon future panels. This article evaluates the possibility that judges engage in strategic judicial lawmaking by voting more ideologically in published cases than in unpublished cases. To test this hypothesis, all …
Supermajority Rules And The Judicial Confirmation Process, Michael B. Rappaport, John O. Mcginnis
Supermajority Rules And The Judicial Confirmation Process, Michael B. Rappaport, John O. Mcginnis
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
In this paper we assess the effect of possible supermajority rules on the now contentious Senate confirmation process for judges. We deploy a formula for evaluating supermajority rules that we have developed in other papers. First, we consider a sixty-vote rule in the Senate for the confirmation of federal judges–an explicit version of the supermajority norm that may be emerging from the filibuster. While we briefly discuss how such a rule would affect the project of maximizing the number of originalist judges, for the most part we evaluate the rule on the realist assumption that judges will pursue their own …
'You'd Better Be Good': Congressional Threats Of Removal Against Federal Judges, Marc O. Degirolami
'You'd Better Be Good': Congressional Threats Of Removal Against Federal Judges, Marc O. Degirolami
ExpressO
In the attached article, I argue that congressional threats of removal against federal judges are increasing in prevalence and forcefulness and that as a result the strained relationship between the judiciary and Congress – a topic of recent attention and debate – will continue to deteriorate in the coming years. I examine two bills, the Feeney Amendment to the PROTECT Act and House of Representatives Resolution 568 (in which Congress would disavow citation in judicial decisions to foreign law), to demonstrate this thesis.
I next ask what explains the phenomenon of congressional threats of removal, deploying first Thomas Hobbes’ state-of-nature …
Clasificación De Las Causas De La Revocación De Sentencias Por Operación Del Recurso Extraordinario (Gráficos), Horacio M. Lynch
Clasificación De Las Causas De La Revocación De Sentencias Por Operación Del Recurso Extraordinario (Gráficos), Horacio M. Lynch
Horacio M. LYNCH
No abstract provided.
Knowledge Constnlction And Academic Transformation On Sociology Of Law Studies In China(中国法律社会学的知识建构和学术转型), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Separation Of Powers—Restoring The Constitutional Formula To The Federal Judicial Appointment Process: Taking The Vice Out Of "Advice And Consent", Jason Eric Sharp
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amicus Curiae: Intervención De Amigos Del Tribunal, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Amicus Curiae: Intervención De Amigos Del Tribunal, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Horacio M. LYNCH
Cuadro realizado en base a la Acordada 28/2004 (14Jul04) de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación.
Reingeniería De La Corte Suprema De La Nación 2: Información Sobre La Tarea Del Alto Tribunal, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Reingeniería De La Corte Suprema De La Nación 2: Información Sobre La Tarea Del Alto Tribunal, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Horacio M. LYNCH
La información es clave para tomar decisiones. En el trabajo REINGENIERÍA (1) hicimos amplia referencia a la información en general (para el tribunal, las partes, el público, el extranjero). En este caso nos limitamos a uno sólo de estos aspectos: la información sobre la tarea de la Corte con el exclusivo propósito de dar fundamentos a las propuestas de cambio que se sugieran.
Mesa Del Diálogo Argentino - Sector Justicia - Comisión Para El Tratamiento De La Jurisdicción De La Corte Suprema - Síntesis Propositiva - Acuerdo Unánime: Formulación De Una Agenda, Horacio M. Lynch
Horacio M. LYNCH
Recopilación de las propuestas y opiniones de los integrantes de la Comisión.
Contaminating The Verdict: The Problem Of Juror Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Contaminating The Verdict: The Problem Of Juror Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
Michigan Law Review
Democracy by Decree is the latest contribution to a scholarly literature, now nearly thirty-years old, which questions whether judges have the legitimacy and the capacity to oversee the remedial phase of institutional reform litigation. Previous contributors to this literature have come out on one side or the other of the legitimacy and capacity debate. Abram Chayes, Owen Fiss, and more recently, Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin, have all argued that the proper role of judges is to remedy rights violations and that judges possess the legitimate institutional authority to order structural injunctions. Lon Fuller, Donald Horowitz, William Fletcher, and Gerald …
Los Tribunales Supremos Y Un Plan De Reingeniería Para La Corte Suprema De La Argentina, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Los Tribunales Supremos Y Un Plan De Reingeniería Para La Corte Suprema De La Argentina, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Horacio M. LYNCH
Versión depurada del informe REINGENIERÍA - Se exponen los objetivos, principios, criterios y finalidad de un proyecto de reingeniería en la Corte Suprema de la Argentina. REINGENIERÍA DE LA CORTE SUPREMA DE LA NACIÓN – Aspectos organizativos, funcionales y de gobierno del Alto Tribunal (Guía de trabajo) También se reflexiona sobre la repercusión sobre la labor institucional del Alto Tribunal así como también sobre otras cualidades como su independencia y especialmente en su transparencia.
Appropriate Role Of Foreign Judgments In The Interpretation Of American Law: Hearing Before The H. Comm. On The Judiciary, 108th Cong., Mar. 25, 2004 (Statement Of Vicki C. Jackson, Prof. Of Law, Geo. U. L. Center), Vicki C. Jackson
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Purposivism In The Delegation Of Rulemaking Authority To The Courts, Michael Rosensaft
The Role Of Purposivism In The Delegation Of Rulemaking Authority To The Courts, Michael Rosensaft
ExpressO
The courts are often used by Congress as a “political lightning rod,” when Congress cannot decide how to resolve an issue. Congress relies on administrative agencies for their expertise, and it also makes sense for Congress to delegate some rulemaking authority to the courts, relying on a court’s expertise in developing caselaw in an incremental basis. However, this authority should not be lightly implied. A court can tell that Congress has delegated rulemaking authority to it when the purpose of the statute is clear and the text is broadly worded. It thus makes sense in these cases that purposivism should …
Legislative Restraint In The Confirmation Process, Kenneth W. Starr
Legislative Restraint In The Confirmation Process, Kenneth W. Starr
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Three Independences, H. Jefferson Powell
The Three Independences, H. Jefferson Powell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence, William H. Rehnquist
Judicial Independence, William H. Rehnquist
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence And The Scope Of Article Iii--A View From The Federalist, Michael G. Collins
Judicial Independence And The Scope Of Article Iii--A View From The Federalist, Michael G. Collins
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Searching For The Soul Of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study Of Religious Freedom Decisions, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Searching For The Soul Of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study Of Religious Freedom Decisions, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
During the past half century, constitutional theories of religious freedom have been in a state of great controversy, perpetual transformation, and consequent uncertainty. Given the vitality of religious faith for most Americans and the vigor of the enduring debate on the proper role of religious belief and practice in public society, a searching exploration of the influences upon judges in making decisions that uphold or reject claims implicating religious freedom is long overdue. Many thoughtful contributions have been to the debate about whether judges should allow their religious beliefs to surface in the exercise of their judicial role. Yet much …
Judge Keith, The Constitution And National Security From Haddad To Sinclair - The Damon J. Keith Law Collection Of African-American Legal History Wayne State University Spencer Partrich Auditorium November 18, 2003, Robert Allen Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Agenda Para El Tratamiento De Los Problemas De La Corte Suprema, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Agenda Para El Tratamiento De Los Problemas De La Corte Suprema, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Horacio M. LYNCH
Una propuesta para el tratamiento orgánico de los problemas de la Corte Suprema.
Corte Suprema : Carga De Trabajo Y Producción, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Corte Suprema : Carga De Trabajo Y Producción, Horacio M. Lynch, María Clara Pujol
Horacio M. LYNCH
Para proponer cambios en el Alto Tribunales es fundamental conocer el trabajo que le llega, los recursos con que cuenta, cómo se organiza, cuánto produce. El presente estudio - efectuado en el marco del proyecto “Reingeniería de la Corte Suprema” - se ha basado en (a) información de la Oficina de Estadística de la Corte (correspondiente al año 2002) y (b) datos del Presupuesto Nacional del año ___, (c) información sobre salarios obtenidos también del Presupuesto, junto con información propia.
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
Linda L. Berger
No abstract provided.
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
Marbury V. Madison As The First Great Administrative Law Decision, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 481 (2004), Thomas W. Merrill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
Judicial Independence In Virginia, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (2004), Samuel R. Olken
Foreword, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 317 (2004), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Province Of The Judiciary, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 325 (2004), William E. Nelson
The Province Of The Judiciary, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 325 (2004), William E. Nelson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.