Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Judicial Power (2)
- Judicial Process (2)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
-
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Confirmation Hearings (1)
- Constitutional change (1)
- Federal Court Judges (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Institutional reform litigation (1)
- Jose P. v. Ambach (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Candidates (1)
- Judicial Selection (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Sandler (Ross) (1)
- Schoenbrod (David) (1)
- State constitutional law (1)
- Supreme Court Justices (1)
- United States (1)
- United States Consitition 1st Amendment (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Voting Rights Act of 1965 (1)
- Zambia. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
The Supreme Court's Legitimacy Dilemma, Tara Leigh Grove
The Supreme Court's Legitimacy Dilemma, Tara Leigh Grove
Tara L. Grove
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law Leading Cases: Judicial Elections, Nathan B. Oman
Constitutional Law Leading Cases: Judicial Elections, Nathan B. Oman
Nathan B. Oman
No abstract provided.
How Merrick Garland Could Help Heal America, Jeffrey Bellin
How Merrick Garland Could Help Heal America, Jeffrey Bellin
Jeffrey Bellin
No abstract provided.
Rationing The Constitution: Beyond And Below, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Rationing The Constitution: Beyond And Below, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
If The Judicial Confirmation Process Is Broken, Can A Statute Fix It?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
If The Judicial Confirmation Process Is Broken, Can A Statute Fix It?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
No abstract provided.
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
What's A Judge To Do? Remedying The Remedy In Institutional Reform Litigation, Susan Poser
Susan Poser
Democracy by Decree is the latest contribution to a scholarly literature, now nearly thirty-years old, which questions whether judges have the legitimacy and the capacity to oversee the remedial phase of institutional reform litigation. Previous contributors to this literature have come out on one side or the other of the legitimacy and capacity debate. Abram Chayes, Owen Fiss, and more recently, Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin, have all argued that the proper role of judges is to remedy rights violations and that judges possess the legitimate institutional authority to order structural injunctions. Lon Fuller, Donald Horowitz, William Fletcher, and Gerald …
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
James Gardner
Evidence marshaled in a new article by Jonathan Marshfield suggests strongly that unlike judges of U.S. federal courts, judges of American state supreme courts both recognize and embrace their role as active participants in the process of indirect popular self-rule. Consequently, they much more willingly serve as active and self-conscious vectors of governance. This is not to say that state judges lack appropriate judicial humility; it is to say merely that they possess a different and more nuanced understanding of the role of courts in American government than some of their federal counterparts.
Attorney General V Mutuna And Others (Appeal No. 088/2012) [2013] Zmsc 38, Muna B. Ndulo
Attorney General V Mutuna And Others (Appeal No. 088/2012) [2013] Zmsc 38, Muna B. Ndulo
Muna B Ndulo
No abstract provided.