Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (3)
- Cigarette packaging (2)
- 425 U.S. 748 (1)
- 447 U.S. 557 (1)
- Accessibility (1)
-
- Bushco (1)
- Central Hudson Gas (1)
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric (1)
- Combs (1)
- Constitutional Rights (1)
- Content-neutral (1)
- Context (1)
- Expressive conduct (1)
- FDA (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Food & Drug Administration (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Games (1)
- Petition Clause (1)
- Rights of minors (1)
- Smoking (1)
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Care (1)
- Speech-friendly (1)
- Strict scrutiny (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Video games (1)
- Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1)
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Privacy Petitions And Institutional Legitimacy, Lauren Henry Scholz
Privacy Petitions And Institutional Legitimacy, Lauren Henry Scholz
Scholarly Publications
This Article argues that a petitions process for privacy concerns arising from new technologies would substantially aid in gauging privacy social norms and legitimating regulation of new technologies. An accessible, transparent petitions process would empower individuals who have privacy concerns by making their proposals for change more visible. Moreover, data accumulated from such a petitions process would provide the requisite information to enable institutions to incorporate social norms into privacy policy development. Hearing and responding to privacy petitions would build trust with the public regarding the role of government and large companies in shaping the modern privacy technical infrastructure. This …
Shareholder Political Primacy, Jay B. Kesten
Shareholder Political Primacy, Jay B. Kesten
Scholarly Publications
Corporate political activity raises an important and diffcult question of corporate law: who decides when the corporation should speak and what it should say? In several cases, the Supreme Court has provided a clear answer: shareholders, acting through the procedures of corporate democracy. While this holding has attracted substantial academic and public criticism, there has been no sustained evaluation (beyond identifying the potential agency costs of corporate political activity) of the possibility that the Supreme Court's appeal to the fraught concept of "corporate democracy," though woefully under-theorized, might be the best allocation of power in the limited context of corporate …
Graphic Labels, Dire Warnings And The Facile Assumption Of Factual Content In Compelled Commercial Speech, Nat Stern
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Secondary Speech And The Protective Approach To Interpretive Dualities In The Roberts Court, Nat Stern
Secondary Speech And The Protective Approach To Interpretive Dualities In The Roberts Court, Nat Stern
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Advancing An Adaptive Standard Of Strict Scrutiny For Content-Based Commercial Speech Regulation, Nat Stern, Mark Joseph Stern
Advancing An Adaptive Standard Of Strict Scrutiny For Content-Based Commercial Speech Regulation, Nat Stern, Mark Joseph Stern
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Implications Of Libel Doctrine For Nondefamatory Falsehoods Under The First Amendement, Nat Stern
Implications Of Libel Doctrine For Nondefamatory Falsehoods Under The First Amendement, Nat Stern
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Taxes, Free Expression, And Adult Entertainment, Steve R. Johnson
Taxes, Free Expression, And Adult Entertainment, Steve R. Johnson
Scholarly Publications
The interaction of morality and money produces interesting results. One manifestation is legislation in some states and proposals in others to impose higher taxes on “gentlemen’s show lounges” (OK, I mean strip clubs) and other venues of adult entertainment.
In 2010 and 2011 two state supreme courts passed on the legality of different forms of those taxes, upholding them against challenges that they infringed on free speech/free expression rights protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This installment of the column considers those two decisions: the February 2010 Utah decision in Bushco v. Utah State Tax Commi …
“Exceedingly Vexed And Difficult”: Games And The First Amendment, Michael T. Morley
“Exceedingly Vexed And Difficult”: Games And The First Amendment, Michael T. Morley
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.