Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sentencing (2)
- Alsification (1)
- Armed Career Criminal Act (1)
- Attorney general (1)
- Ballot initiative (1)
-
- Constitutional nondefense (1)
- Convictions (1)
- Direct democracy (1)
- Duty to defend (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Evolving Standards of Decency (1)
- Executive (1)
- Expressivism (1)
- Johnson v. United States (1)
- Marriage equality (1)
- Media (1)
- Nondefense (1)
- Politics (1)
- Postconviction relief (1)
- Preference (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Public preference (1)
- Reputation (1)
- Resentencing (1)
- Same sex marriage (1)
- Social Darwinism (1)
- Solitary Confinement (1)
- State attorney general (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Vagueness (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Constitutional Law
Declining Controversial Cases: How Marriage Equality Changed The Paradigm, Elena Baylis
Declining Controversial Cases: How Marriage Equality Changed The Paradigm, Elena Baylis
Articles
Until recently, state attorneys general defended their states’ laws as a matter of course. However, one attorney general’s decision not to defend his state’s law in a prominent marriage equality case sparked a cascade of attorney general declinations in other marriage equality cases. Declinations have also increased across a range of states and with respect to several other contentious subjects, including abortion and gun control. This Essay evaluates the causes and implications of this recent trend of state attorneys general abstaining from defending controversial laws on the grounds that those laws are unconstitutional, focusing on the marriage equality cases as …
Residual Impact: Resentencing Implications Of Johnson's Potential Ruling On Acca's Constitutionality, Leah Litman
Residual Impact: Resentencing Implications Of Johnson's Potential Ruling On Acca's Constitutionality, Leah Litman
Articles
In January 2015, the Supreme Court directed the parties to brief and argue an additional question in Johnson v. United States: “Whether the residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is unconstitutionally vague.” The order represents an unusual move because the defendant had not raised the vagueness issue and the Court issued the order after it had already heard argument on the question raised in the petition for certiorari. Commentators therefore view the order as a signal that the Court will likely invalidate the residual clause. This decision will have been several years …
Evolving Standards Of Domination: Abandoning A Flawed Legal Standard And Approaching A New Era In Penal Reform, Spearit
Articles
This Article critiques the evolving standards of decency doctrine as a form of Social Darwinism. It argues that evolving standards of decency provided a system of review that was tailor-made for Civil Rights opponents to scale back racial progress. Although as a doctrinal matter, evolving standards sought to tie punishment practices to social mores, prison sentencing became subject to political agendas that determined the course of punishment more than the benevolence of a maturing society. Indeed, rather than the fierce competition that is supposed to guide social development, the criminal justice system was consciously deployed as a means of social …