Conflict of Laws Commons^™

Self-Settled Spendthrift Trusts: Should A Few Bad Apples Spoil The Bunch?, Gideon Rothschild, Daniel S. Rubin, Jonathan G. Blattmachr

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

It is unfortunate, but perhaps not terribly surprising, that the first two reported cases to consider the application of conflict of laws principles to self-settled spendthrift trusts both involved "bad facts" from an asset protection planning standpoint. In this regard, the adage "bad facts produce bad law" is not a slight on the courts, but rather an acknowledgment of a court's primary duty to do substantial justice to the parties immediately before it. However, in an effort to do substantial justice to the parties immediately before them, the Portnoy and Brooks courts have forged what may well become the first …

Baseball And Chicken Salad: A Realistic Look At Choice Of Law, Harold G. Maier

Vanderbilt Law Review

Most conflict of laws teachers come to their calling because they are fascinated with the intellectual variety of the subject matter and the sense of systemic universality that pervades the legal decisions with which they work. We deal, after all, with some very fundamental aspects of law and the legal system in a world of fascinating abstractions mixed with concrete decisions. Although I have taken no survey, conversations with many of my colleagues suggest that they, as did I, found the course Conflict of Laws in the second or third year of law school to be one that reawakened the …

Recent Decisions, Susan A. Shands

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This case presented the district and circuit courts with the problem of how to maneuver the forum's conflict of laws rules in order to apply Texas law to an injury caused by a defective product manufactured in Texas when the injury occurred on foreign soil. On a policy basis, the lower courts did make the more equitable decision in applying Texas law. Viewed under one commentator's test, both lower courts were applying the law that would give the most predictable and uniform results, maintain international and interstate order, simplify the judicial task, advance the forum's interest, and apply the better …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Recent Cases

Conflict of Laws--False Conflicts--Federal Court Sitting in Diversity Action May Find "False Conflict" and Ignore Forum State's Choice of Law Rule When One State Has Clearly Predominant Interest

========================

Constitutional Law--Creditors' Rights--Civil Arrest Statutes that Promote Valid State Objectives and Provide Procedural Fairness Do Not Violate the Due Process Requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment

========================

Constitutional Law--Supremacy Clause--State Supreme Court Not Bound To Follow Federal District Court Decision on Constitutionality of Municipal Ordinance

=========================

Securities Regulation--Franchises--Franchise Agreement that Permits Active Participation by the Franchisee in the Operation of the Business and Does Not Provide the Franchisor with Risk …

Conflict Of Laws--1959 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

There have been several developments during the year regarding jurisdiction over nonresidents.

In 1947 the legislature passed a statute requiring "any unincorporated association or organization, whether resident or nonresident," which was doing or desiring to do business in the state to appoint an agent for the service of process and providing that in case of failure to appoint the agent, service might be had on the Secretary of State.' The constitutionality of this act, as applied to foreign associations has since been upheld. A current amendment to the section has added the words "including non-resident partnerships" at the end of …

Utility Of The Jurisdictional Principle In A Policy Centered Conflict Of Laws, Edwin W. Briggs

Vanderbilt Law Review

Various recent studies' have confirmed the suspicion that courts continue to find it necessary to approve and rely heavily on the principle of "legislative jurisdiction" residing in some one state, even though they do not often admit it in so many words. Since the discussion of the problem by courts generally assumes that the single question in conflicts is choice of law, and since one of the most influential writers on the subject in recent times has denied the validity of the jurisdictional principle at the common law as a means of solving a conflicts problem, a study giving further …