Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agency (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
-
- Civil Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Torts (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws
How Can Federal Actors Compete On Noncompetes? Examining The Need For And Possibility Of Federal Action On Noncompetition Agreements, Robert Mcavoy
How Can Federal Actors Compete On Noncompetes? Examining The Need For And Possibility Of Federal Action On Noncompetition Agreements, Robert Mcavoy
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Employees have been frustrated by the restrictiveness of noncompete agreements and confused about their enforceability for decades. The added complication of choice-of-law provisions in employment contracts with noncompetes creates a sea of unpredictability for both employees and employers.
Each state applies its own policy to noncompete agreements. While every state treats noncompetes differently than typical contract provisions, a broad spectrum exists between the states that are friendly and those that are hostile to the enforcement of noncompetes. Employees and employers often fail to understand whether their noncompete is enforceable under the jurisdiction chosen by the contract, and courts override choice-of-law …
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Most state rules of substantive law, whether legislative or judicial, ordinarily adjust rights and obligations among local parties with respect to local events. Conventional choice of law methodologies for adjudicating disputes with multistate connections all start from an explicit or implicit assumption of a choice between such locally oriented substantive rules. This article reveals, for the first time, that some state rules of substantive law ordinarily adjust rights and obligations with respect to parties and events connected to more than one state and only occasionally apply to wholly local matters. For these rules I use the term “nominally domestic rules …