Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 1976 Copyright Act (1)
- Algorithms (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Computers (1)
- Congress (1)
-
- Consumers (1)
- Copies (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Copyright owners (1)
- Copyright reform (1)
- Creators (1)
- Data (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Health care (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Licenses (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Random access memory (1)
- Readers (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Safety (1)
- Technology (1)
- Torts (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
Artificial Intelligence In Health Care: Applications And Legal Implications, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Artificial Intelligence In Health Care: Applications And Legal Implications, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Articles
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly moving to change the healthcare system. Driven by the juxtaposition of big data and powerful machine learning techniques—terms I will explain momentarily—innovators have begun to develop tools to improve the process of clinical care, to advance medical research, and to improve efficiency. These tools rely on algorithms, programs created from healthcare data that can make predictions or recommendations. However, the algorithms themselves are often too complex for their reasoning to be understood or even stated explicitly. Such algorithms may be best described as “black-box.” This article briefly describes the concept of AI in medicine, including …
Fetishizing Copies, Jessica Litman
Fetishizing Copies, Jessica Litman
Book Chapters
Our copyright laws encourage authors to create new works and communicate them to the public, because we hope that people will read the books, listen to the music, see the art, watch the films, run the software, and build and inhabit the buildings. That is the way that copyright promotes the Progress of Science. Recently, that not-very-controversial principle has collided with copyright owners’ conviction that they should be able to control, or at least collect royalties from, all uses of their works. A particularly ill-considered manifestation of this conviction is what I have decided to call copy-fetish. This is the …