Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bhanot v. Chertoff (1)
- CSR (1)
- Calle (1)
- Cao He Lin v. US Department of Justice (1)
- Chen v. INS (1)
-
- Chenery (1)
- Chevron (1)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
- Dale v. Holder (1)
- Dhine v. Slattery (1)
- Dobrota (1)
- Dutch Civil Code (1)
- EOIR (1)
- EPA (1)
- EU (1)
- Executive Office for Immigration Review (1)
- Fergiste (1)
- Futility of Remand (1)
- GRI (1)
- Ghebremedhin v. Ashcroft (1)
- Global Reporting Initiative (1)
- Gonzalez v. Thomas (1)
- Halim (1)
- Hibert v. INS (1)
- Hoxhallari v. Gonzales (1)
- Hussain v. Gonzales (1)
- INRA/Deloitte (1)
- INS v. Ventura (1)
- ISEAL (1)
- Karimijanaki (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Comparative and Foreign Law
Assessing Effectiveness Of International Private Regulations In The Csr Arena, Martijn W. Scheltema
Assessing Effectiveness Of International Private Regulations In The Csr Arena, Martijn W. Scheltema
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
No abstract provided.
“To Remand, Or Not To Remand”: Ventura’S Ordinary Remand Rule And The Evolving Jurisprudence Of Futility, Patrick J. Glen
“To Remand, Or Not To Remand”: Ventura’S Ordinary Remand Rule And The Evolving Jurisprudence Of Futility, Patrick J. Glen
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
Presumably few federal appellate judges are confronted with the Danish prince’s existential angst: “To be, or not to be: that is the question. . . .” Nonetheless, a similar ambivalence may be present in the circumstance of judicial review of administrative agency decisions. No less eminent an authority than former Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly expressed just such angst in the introduction to his 1969 Duke Law Journal article, in which he attempted to discern bright-line rules in the Supreme Court’s 1943 SEC v. Chenery decision: “Although when I began my labors, I had the hope of discovering a bright …