Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Computer Law (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (2)
-
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Keyword
-
- Computer Law (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Law and Technology (3)
- Arts and Entertainment (2)
-
- Free speech (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology (2)
- Ad-supported (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Advertising law (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Autonomy interests (1)
- Behavioral economics (1)
- Broadcast media (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
- Communications processing (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Content (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Digital media (1)
- Economics (1)
- FCC (1)
- FRAND (1)
- Feminism (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Visual Gut Punch: Persuasion, Emotion, And The Constitutional Meaning Of Graphic Disclosure, Ellen P. Goodman
Visual Gut Punch: Persuasion, Emotion, And The Constitutional Meaning Of Graphic Disclosure, Ellen P. Goodman
ellen p. goodman
The ability of government to “nudge” with information mandates, or merely to inform consumers of risks, is circumscribed by First Amendment interests that have been poorly articulated in the relevant law and commentary. New graphic cigarette warning labels supplied courts with the first opportunity to assess the informational interests attending novel forms of product disclosures. The D.C. Circuit enjoined them as unconstitutional, compelled by a narrative that the graphic labels converted government from objective informer to ideological persuader, shouting its warning to manipulate consumer decisions. This interpretation will leave little room for graphic disclosure and is already being used to …
Consumers As Marketers: An Analysis Of The Facebook “Like” Feature As An Endorsement, Chang Zhou
Consumers As Marketers: An Analysis Of The Facebook “Like” Feature As An Endorsement, Chang Zhou
Chang Zhou
No abstract provided.
Sex Is Less Offensive Than Violence: A Call To Update Obscenity Jurisprudence, Rachel Simon
Sex Is Less Offensive Than Violence: A Call To Update Obscenity Jurisprudence, Rachel Simon
Rachel Simon
This article addresses the gender bias presented by the disparate treatment of sex and violence under current obscenity jurisprudence. Under the controlling standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California, sexual works may readily be regulated as obscenity, while violent works unequivocally may not. This article posits that this disparate treatment is the product of entrenched stereotypes about the way men and women “should” react to sex and violence, and notes the hypocrisy of failing to apply the same reasoning to assessments of violent versus sexual material.
First, reliance on “community standards” to define what material …
Fixing Frand: A Pseudo-Pool Approach To Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Jorge Contreras
Fixing Frand: A Pseudo-Pool Approach To Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Jorge Contreras
Jorge L Contreras
Technical interoperability standards are critical elements of mobile telephones, laptop computers, digital files, and thousands of other products in the modern networked economy. Most such standards are developed in so-called voluntary standards-development organizations (SDOs) that require participants to license patents essential to the standard on terms that are “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory” (FRAND). FRAND commitments are thought to avoid the problem of patent hold-up: the imposition of excessive royalty demands after a standard has been widely adopted in the market. While, at first blush, FRAND commitments seem to assure product vendors that patents will not obstruct the manufacture and sale …
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Institutionalized Word Taboo: The Continuing Saga Of Fcc Indecency Regulation, Christopher M. Fairman
Christopher M Fairman
Indecency regulation by the Federal Communication Commission and Supreme Court is the product of word taboo—the subconscious, emotional, involuntary avoidance of certain words out of fear that some harm will occur if they are spoken. Acting in tandem, the Court and the Commissioners create institutionalized word taboo based upon the assumption that broadcast media’s pervasive and intrusive presence into the home endangers unsupervised children. Technological innovation renders this premise invalid today, but institutionalized word taboo remains. This article (1) traces the rise of indecency regulation, (2) explains the invalidity of the assumptions used to justify it, (3) introduces word taboo …
Copyright Freeconomics, John M. Newman
Copyright Freeconomics, John M. Newman
John M. Newman
Innovation has wreaked creative destruction on traditional content platforms. During the decade following Napster’s rise and fall, industry organizations launched litigation campaigns to combat the dramatic downward pricing pressure created by the advent of zero-price, copyright-infringing content. These campaigns attracted a torrent of debate, still ongoing, among scholars and stakeholders—but this debate has missed the forest for the trees. Industry organizations have abandoned litigation efforts, and many copyright owners now compete directly with infringing products by offering licit content at a price of $0.
This sea change has ushered in an era of “copyright freeconomics.” Drawing on an emerging body …