Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legislation (4)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Civil Law (3)
- Construction Law (3)
- Land Use Law (3)
-
- Administrative Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Food and Drug Law (2)
- Government Contracts (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Taxation-Federal (2)
- Taxation-State and Local (2)
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust Law (1)
- Cannabis Law (1)
- Cannabis Policy (1)
- Cannabis Regulation (1)
- Capital Gains Tax (1)
-
- Edibles (1)
- Effect of Zoning Laws (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Floating easements (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Internet Anticompetitive Practices (1)
- Monopoly of Thought (1)
- Prohibitionist fears (1)
- Project influence rule (1)
- Qualified Opportunity Zones (1)
- RCW 81.112.010 (1)
- Washington law (1)
- Zoning Laws (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Commercial Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
American Edibles: How Cannabis Regulatory Policy Rehashes Prohibitionist Fears And What To Do About It, Connor Burns, Jay Wexler
American Edibles: How Cannabis Regulatory Policy Rehashes Prohibitionist Fears And What To Do About It, Connor Burns, Jay Wexler
Seattle University Law Review
Why can’t we buy a cannabis muffin with our morning coffee? For much of the past century, the answer was simple: cannabis was illegal. Now, however, with more and more states legalizing cannabis for adult use, the answer is far less clear. Even in those states that have legalized cannabis, the simple action of buying and eating edibles at the same location has somehow remained a pipe dream despite consumer demand. Digging a little deeper, we can see how contemporary alarmism—by rehashing the same prohibitionist rhetoric demonizing cannabis for over eighty years—has once again arisen with a new target: cannabis-infused …
For Richer Or Poorer: Incentivizing Meaningful Investments In Qualified Opportunity Zones, Monica L. Keo
For Richer Or Poorer: Incentivizing Meaningful Investments In Qualified Opportunity Zones, Monica L. Keo
Seattle University Law Review
The wealth disparity in the United States is nothing new. Many have proposed wealth taxes and higher tax rates for large corporations to address income inequality; however, these proposals have been criticized as tax programs that are difficult to administer. Congress passed the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) in 2017 and created a new investment vehicle known as the Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ). The QOZ program incentivizes private investors to invest their capital gains in exchange for a reduction in capital gains tax. The underlying idea of the QOZ program is to utilize a new tool designed to spur …
A Monopoly Of Thought—How Growing Anticompetitive Practices On The Internet Affect Creative Work, Laurel Brown
A Monopoly Of Thought—How Growing Anticompetitive Practices On The Internet Affect Creative Work, Laurel Brown
Seattle University Law Review
This Note will address how dominant Internet companies detrimentally impact creative work and how legal solutions might be employed to combat the damage inflicted by online monopolies. Part I will focus on how certain Internet companies became dominant, showing an evolution from egalitarian ideals to the consolidated control of the World Wide Web (the web) by companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon. In Part II, this Note will focus on how two particular companies—Google and Facebook—affect creative endeavors in their control of access to audiences and by determining the economics of content production on the Internet. Part III details what …
Property Owners Look Out: The Train Is Coming, Natalie Crane
Property Owners Look Out: The Train Is Coming, Natalie Crane
Seattle University Law Review
Over 4 million people currently live in the Puget Sound area in Washington state, and about 6 million people are expected to reside in the area by 2050. Additionally, Seattle renters faced a 71.2% increase in rent prices from 2010 to 2019. This data supports the need for much of the congested Seattle population to move outward and commute into the city for work. The implementation of a 116-mile system and other efforts to increase public transportation makes this need achievable and affordable.
This Comment focuses on the issue of just compensation in eminent domain; specifically, unique questions of compensation …