Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Inc. taxpayer; tax collector; Complete Auto test; Tax Injunction Act; safe harbor; in personam jurisdiction; Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz; virtual presence; Public Law 86-272; brick-and-mortar; (1)
- Inc. v. Brady; forbidden effect; substantial nexus; Pike v. Bruce Church (1)
- Inc. v. City of Valdez; Complete Auto Transit (1)
- Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois; commerce clause; S.B. 106; Congress; Kansas; Constitution; retailer; Polar Tankers (1)
- Pandemic; COVID-19; global; public health; economic and financial crisis; markets; corporations; directors' duty of care; fiduciary duty; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); comparative law; board of directors; civil law; Anglo-American law; corporate governance; venture capital-backed firms; family business firms; United States; Delaware; United Kingdom; Germany; France; Italy; The Netherlands; Gross Domestic Product (GDP); European Union; shareholders; venture capital; capitalism (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Commercial Law
Directors’ Duty Of Care In Times Of Financial Distress Following The Global Epidemic Crisis, Leon Yehuda Anidjar
Directors’ Duty Of Care In Times Of Financial Distress Following The Global Epidemic Crisis, Leon Yehuda Anidjar
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The global COVID-19 pandemic is causing the large-scale end of life and severe human suffering globally. This massive public health crisis created a significant economic crisis and is reflected in a recession of global production and the collapse of confidence in the functions of markets. Corporations and boards of directors around the world are required to design specific strategies to tackle the negative consequences of the crisis. This is especially true for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that suffered tremendous economic loss, and their continued existence as ongoing concern is under considerable risk. Given these uncertain financial times, this Article …
South Dakota V. Wayfair: An Ill-Conceived Blow To The Free Flow Of Interstate Commerce, Revel Shinn Atkinson
South Dakota V. Wayfair: An Ill-Conceived Blow To The Free Flow Of Interstate Commerce, Revel Shinn Atkinson
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
For more than a century, brick-and-mortar retailers have been losing local customers—first with the rise of mail-order houses and then more acutely with the rapid growth of online retail. As a result, states have noticed a significant loss in sales tax revenue. While an equivalent amount of tax is typically still owed to the state in the form of a use tax, which is to be remitted to the state by the customer, because these taxes are not automatically collected at the time of the sale, customers have overwhelmingly elected not to pay them. In an effort to recover this …