Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Accounting (2)
- Banking and Finance (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Corporations (2)
-
- Economics (2)
- General Law (2)
- International Trade (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Technology (2)
- Secured Transactions (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Article 9 (1)
- Arts and Entertainment (1)
- Asset Class (1)
- Asset Securitization (1)
- Asset-Backed Securities (1)
- Asset-Backed Security (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Biography (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Commercial Law
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
What Makes Asset Securitization "Inefficient"?, Kenji Yamazaki
What Makes Asset Securitization "Inefficient"?, Kenji Yamazaki
ExpressO
Despite the damage caused by the recent Enron scandal , the asset securitization market has been vibrant and has become a popular financing alternative . A number of academics emphasize its merits and suggest that it is a more favorable way of financing, and Congress’s proposal to make sales of asset in securitization immune from characterization as secured transactions under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2001 (the “Reform Act”) almost materialized when the Enron scandal hit the scene. Conversely, there have been accusations that securitization is not a legitimate way of financing because, for example, it fosters fraudulent transactions.
Why …
Injunctions Against Liquidation In Trade Remedy Cases: A Petitioner's View, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 45 (2005), Jeffrey M. Telep
Injunctions Against Liquidation In Trade Remedy Cases: A Petitioner's View, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 45 (2005), Jeffrey M. Telep
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.