Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Equal protection (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- State (3)
- 1989-90 Term (2)
- 1990) (2)
-
- Civil rights clause (2)
- Court of Appeals (2)
- Defense (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Federal (2)
- Liberty (2)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (2)
- Peremptory challenges (2)
- Prohibits (2)
- Prosecution (2)
- State action (2)
- State constitution (2)
- Supreme Court and local government (2)
- § 11 (2)
- (decided March 29 (1)
- A comparison of a mentally ill individual’s right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions (1)
- Administrative review (1)
- Administrative scheme (1)
- Adultery (1)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Akathisia (1)
- Akinesia (1)
- Antipsychotic medication (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Florida's Involuntary Aids Testing Statutes, Robert Craig Waters
Florida's Involuntary Aids Testing Statutes, Robert Craig Waters
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
What is the meaning and content of the "liberty" protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment? In Michael H. v. Gerald D. Justices Brennan and Scalia spelled out what at first blush appear to be sharply contrasting understandings of the meaning of liberty and of the substantive limits liberty imposes on state action. Justice Scalia argued that the "liberty" protected by a substantive interpretation of due process is only the liberty to engage in activities historically protected against state intervention by firmly entrenched societal traditions. I will sometimes call this the "traditionalist" interpretation of liberty. Justice Brennan, …