Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination

Pittsburgh Press Co. V. Pittsburgh Commission On Human Relations, Et. Al., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Pittsburgh Press Co. V. Pittsburgh Commission On Human Relations, Et. Al., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


San Antonio Independent School District V. Rodriguez, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

San Antonio Independent School District V. Rodriguez, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


School Board Of The City Of Richmond, Virginia V. State Board Of Education Of The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Sep 1972

School Board Of The City Of Richmond, Virginia V. State Board Of Education Of The Commonwealth Of Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Racial Discrimination In Employment: Rights And Remedies, J. Ralph Beaird May 1972

Racial Discrimination In Employment: Rights And Remedies, J. Ralph Beaird

Scholarly Works

Professor Beaird believes that the current multiplicity of forums available to an employee who alleges discrimination against him should be merged into one. Ideally he would like to see an administrative agency given primary jurisdiction with authority similar to that possessed by the NLRB. Until an agency is given such power, Professor Beaird suggests that the forums themselves apply collateral estoppel principles to alleviate the inequities inherent in repetitious litigation.


Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski Jan 1972

Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski

Faculty Scholarship

IN 1946 JUSTICE HUGO BLACK DECLARED that one of the objects of the fourteenth amendment was to apply the Bill of Rights to the States. He was confident that an analysis of the intent of the framers of the amendment would support his assertion. A few years later the Supreme Court requested such an investigation, but when the analysis was made and the results presented to it, the Supreme Court concluded that the framers' intent could not be determined. The uncertainty surrounding the intent of the framers of the fourteenth amendment has had profound implications on the application of that …