Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights Act (2)
- ADA (1)
- Adakai v. Front Row Seat Inc. (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
-
- Bartlett v. New York Board of Law Examiners (1)
- Charlotte (1)
- Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (1)
- Delph v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. (1)
- Desegregation (1)
- Doe v. City of Belleville (1)
- FLSA (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Garcia v. Elf Atochem North America (1)
- Giddens v. Shell Oil Co. (1)
- Goluszek v. H.P. Smith (1)
- Harper v. BP Exploration & Oil Inc. (1)
- Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. (1)
- Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins (1)
- Integration (1)
- Johnson v. Transportation Agency Santa Clara County (1)
- Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n (1)
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. (1)
- McWilliams v. Fairfax County Bd. of Supervisors (1)
- Meritor Savings Bank FSB v. Vinson (1)
- Merriweather v. Family Dollar Stores of Indiana Inc. (1)
- N.C. (1)
- Nelson v. Boatmen's Bancshares (1)
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services Inc. (1)
- Padilla v. Metro-North Commuter RR (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Holding The Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claim At Arm's Length: The Supreme Court's Strict [And Correct] Interpretation Of Title Vii In Oncale V. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., Thomas I. Queen Jr.
Holding The Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claim At Arm's Length: The Supreme Court's Strict [And Correct] Interpretation Of Title Vii In Oncale V. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., Thomas I. Queen Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids an employer from "discriminat[ing] against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's ...sex." In addition to prohibiting discriminatory hiring practices based on the potential employee's sex, the Supreme Court has extended the language of Title VII to afford employees a remedy for sexual harassment in the workplace.
A Uniform Standard For Exemplary Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases, Judith J. Johnson
A Uniform Standard For Exemplary Damages In Employment Discrimination Cases, Judith J. Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
The standards for exemplary damages in employment discrimination cases are in disarray. The major federal provisions that prohibit private employment discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"),2 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ("§ 1981"), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), all have an indistinguishably worded standard for assessing exemplary damages: "reckless indifference to federally protected rights."
Charlotte And The American Dilemma, Carl W. Tobias
Charlotte And The American Dilemma, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Review of Davison Douglas, Reading, Writing and Race: The Desegregation of the Charlotte Schools (1995).