Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Democracy (2)
- Absentee Ballots (1)
- Access (1)
- Artificial reproductive technology (1)
- Available (1)
-
- Ballot Access (1)
- Black mother crack cocaine sentencing (1)
- Black woman reproductive rights (1)
- Blanket Primary (1)
- Bullock v. Tamiami Trail Tours (1)
- California Democratic Party v. Jones (1)
- Coercive reproduction policies (1)
- Colorado & Santa Fe Railway v. Luther (1)
- Court documents/records (1)
- Crack sentencing disparity (1)
- Critical race feminism (CRF) (1)
- Democratic Party of Washingon v. Reed (1)
- Domestic violence tort injuries (1)
- Dominance theory (1)
- Election Efficiency (1)
- Election Theory (1)
- Elections (1)
- Electoral Competition (1)
- Felon Disenfranchisement (1)
- Feminism and Legal Theory (“FLT”) (1)
- Feminist Legal Theory (1)
- Feminist legal scholars (1)
- Feminist legal theory and torts (1)
- Fetal personhood laws (1)
- First Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Symposium: Feminist Legal Theory, Martha Albertson Fineman
Symposium: Feminist Legal Theory, Martha Albertson Fineman
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Symposium: A Broader Vision Of The Reproductive Rights Movement: Fusing Mainstream And Latina Feminism, Angela Hooton
Symposium: A Broader Vision Of The Reproductive Rights Movement: Fusing Mainstream And Latina Feminism, Angela Hooton
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Work: The Discriminatory Effect Of Veterans' Preferences On Homosexuals, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1083 (2005), Louis J. Virelli Iii
Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Work: The Discriminatory Effect Of Veterans' Preferences On Homosexuals, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1083 (2005), Louis J. Virelli Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Balancing A Burning Cross: The Court And Virginia V. Black, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1205 (2005), Jason A. Abel
Balancing A Burning Cross: The Court And Virginia V. Black, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1205 (2005), Jason A. Abel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Feminist Theory And The Erosion Of Women's Reproductive Rights: The Implications Of Fetal Personhood Laws And In Vitro Fertilization, Lisa Mclennan Brown
Symposium: Feminist Theory And The Erosion Of Women's Reproductive Rights: The Implications Of Fetal Personhood Laws And In Vitro Fertilization, Lisa Mclennan Brown
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Symposium: "Every Shut Eye, Ain't Sleep": Exploring The Impact Of Crack Cocaine Sentencing And The Illusion Of Reproductive Rights For Black Women From A Critical Race Feminist Perspective , Deleso Alford Washington
Symposium: "Every Shut Eye, Ain't Sleep": Exploring The Impact Of Crack Cocaine Sentencing And The Illusion Of Reproductive Rights For Black Women From A Critical Race Feminist Perspective , Deleso Alford Washington
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Toward A Feminist Revision Of Torts, Jennifer B. Wriggins
Symposium: Toward A Feminist Revision Of Torts, Jennifer B. Wriggins
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Competing Values Or False Choices: Coming To Consensus On The Election Reform Debate In Washington State And The Country, Tova Andrea Wang
Competing Values Or False Choices: Coming To Consensus On The Election Reform Debate In Washington State And The Country, Tova Andrea Wang
Seattle University Law Review
This Article examines the problems revealed in Washington State's election system as a result of its staggeringly close gubernatorial election, and compares such problems to those encountered by other states in the 2004 election. It examines the challenge of fixing these problems through the prism of the ongoing debate over what values and goals are most important when making election administration decisions. The various values and goals of expanding voter access, increasing voter participation and election efficiency, preventing voter fraud, ensuring the count of every vote, and creating finality in the voting system are included in this examination. Throughout this …
Death By A Thousand Signatures: The Rise Of Restrictive Ballot Access Laws And The Decline Of Electoral Competition In The United States, Oliver Hall
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores one instance of the countermajoritarian problem in American democracy: how to protect the rights of minor parties and independent candidates participating in an electoral system dominated by two major parties. In particular, this Article focuses on the effect of modern ballot access laws on candidates' rights, arguing that courts ought to treat these laws as a presumptively impermissible form of "collusion in restraint of democracy." Although the article borrows the language of antitrust law, this argument is rooted in core constitutional principles and rights guaranteed under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Nevertheless, the analogy to antitrust law …
Partisanship Redefined: Why Blanket Primaries Are Constitutional, Deidra A. Foster
Partisanship Redefined: Why Blanket Primaries Are Constitutional, Deidra A. Foster
Seattle University Law Review
In 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision that would pave the way for drastic changes in Washington State's election process. In Democratic Party of Washington v. Reed, the court held that Washington's nearly seventy-year-old blanket primary was unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court declined to review the case. The Ninth Circuit professed to be bound by California Democratic Party v. Jones, the Supreme Court case that ruled California's blanket primary unconstitutional just three years earlier, ignoring the argument that Washington's blanket primary differed materially from California's. What followed was a melee of voter disapproval and …
Public Availability Or Practical Obscurity: The Debate Over Public Access To Court Records On The Internet, Arminda Bradford Bepko
Public Availability Or Practical Obscurity: The Debate Over Public Access To Court Records On The Internet, Arminda Bradford Bepko
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.