Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative action (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Congress (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy (2)
-
- Federal courts (2)
- Fourteenth amendment (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Minority (2)
- NAACP (2)
- Section 1983 (2)
- Truth in Criminal Justice Series (2)
- Violation (2)
- "Death to the Klan" rally (1)
- 1983 litigation (1)
- 1988-89 Term (1)
- Actionable (1)
- American Nazi Party (1)
- Amicus brief (1)
- Arlington Heights (1)
- Arrest (1)
- At-will employment contract (1)
- Attorney’s fee (1)
- Bellman (1)
- Black Jack (1)
- Bonding requirements (1)
- Brutality claims (1)
- Brutality litigation (1)
- Burden of production (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Federal Habeas Corpus Review Of State Judgments, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
Federal Habeas Corpus Review Of State Judgments, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Report carries out a review of the historical development of the federal habeas corpus jurisdiction; examines its contemporary character and operation; and discusses relevant policy considerations. The Report concludes that federal habeas corpus as a post-conviction remedy for state prisoners should be abolished or limited as far as possible. The limited reform proposals that were passed by the Senate in 1984 and that are currently before Congress as Title II of the proposed Criminal Justice Reform Act provide the best immediate prospect for improvement.
Adverse Inferences From Silence, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
Adverse Inferences From Silence, Department Of Justice Office Of Legal Policy
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Report, the eighth in the Truth in Criminal Justice series, assesses the rules relating to the evidentiary consideration of the defendant's silence. Its general conclusion is that the existing restrictive rules in this area are unjustified impediments to the search for truth. The notion that the fifth amendment's prohibition of compelling a person in a criminal case to be a witness against himself bars drawing adverse inferences from the defendant's silence is not well-founded. In practical effect, these rules impede the conviction of the guilty by barring consideration of an aspect of the defendant's conduct-his failure to respond to …
Inconsistent Standards Of Substantive Due Process In Economic Regulations: A Result Of The Federalist System Of Government, Keith L. Hendricks
Inconsistent Standards Of Substantive Due Process In Economic Regulations: A Result Of The Federalist System Of Government, Keith L. Hendricks
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
When Racists And Radicals Meet, Ronald J. Bacigal, Margaret Ivey Bacigal
Law Faculty Publications
In order to stimulate scholarly discussion, this Essay presents an empirical account of the Greensboro incident from the perspective of those who participated in the episode and in the resulting civil rights trial. The Essay traces the circumstances leading to the violence and reviews the resultant litigation with special attention given to the role of the trial judge in politically volatile cases. The candid reflections offered by the trial judge and other participants allow the reader to examine both the event and the litigation, not merely in the abstract, but as implemented by flesh-andblood lawyers, litigants, and judges. .
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Honorable George C. Pratt, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Employment Discrimination, Charles Stephen Ralston, Paul Kamenar, William Bradford Reynolds, Gail Wright-Sirmans
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scholars' Reply To Professor Fried, Yale Kamisar, Lee C. Bollinger, Judith C. Areen, Barbara A. Black
Scholars' Reply To Professor Fried, Yale Kamisar, Lee C. Bollinger, Judith C. Areen, Barbara A. Black
Articles
As Solicitor General of the United States, Charles Fried, like any good advocate, was often in the position of attempting to generate broad holdings from relatively narrow and particularistic Supreme Court decisions. This was especially true in affirmative action cases. There, the Department of Justice argued that cautious precedents actually stood for the broad proposition that measures designed to put members of disadvantaged groups on a plane of equality should, for constitutional purposes, be treated the same as measures intended to stigmatize or subordinate them. The Supreme Court, however, has consistently rejected this reading of its precedents and the broad …
Housing Discrimination, Richard F. Bellman ,Esq., Richard Cahn ,Esq.
Housing Discrimination, Richard F. Bellman ,Esq., Richard Cahn ,Esq.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Peer Review: I'Ll Give You My Opinion If You Don't Tell Anyone What It Is: An Analysis Of University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
Peer Review: I'Ll Give You My Opinion If You Don't Tell Anyone What It Is: An Analysis Of University Of Pennsylvania V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
Journal Articles
This article previews the Supreme Court case University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 493 U.S. 192 (1990). The author expected the Court to decide whether the EEOC may subpeopna peer review documents submitted to a university tenure committee when investigating charges that the committee engaged in impermissible discrimination when denying tenure to an associate professor.