Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Legal Ethics (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct (2)
- Practice and Procedure (2)
- Professional responsibility (2)
-
- ABA Standards & Guidelines (1)
- Bar discipline (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Continuing legal education (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- Duty of competence (1)
- Duty of investigation (1)
- E-discovery (1)
- ESI (1)
- Electronic discovery (1)
- Electronically stored information (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Ethical requirements (1)
- FRCP (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Geoff Hazard (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Indigent clients (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Information systems (1)
- International Law (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal education (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
The Search For Clarity In An Attorney's Duty To Google, Michael Thomas Murphy
The Search For Clarity In An Attorney's Duty To Google, Michael Thomas Murphy
All Faculty Scholarship
Attorneys have a professional duty to investigate relevant facts about the matters on which they work. There is no specific rule or statute requiring that an attorney perform an internet search as part of this investigation. Yet attorneys have been found by judges to violate a “Duty to Google” when they have failed to conduct an internet search for relevant information about, for example, a claim, their own client, and even potential jurors in a trial.
So much information is now available to attorneys so easily in electronic search results, it is time to wonder where, when, and how much …
Procedure In Context, Catherine T. Struve
Procedure In Context, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Just And Speedy: On Civil Discovery Sanctions For Luddite Lawyers, Michael Thomas Murphy
Just And Speedy: On Civil Discovery Sanctions For Luddite Lawyers, Michael Thomas Murphy
All Faculty Scholarship
This article presents a theoretical model by which a judge could impose civil sanctions on an attorney - relying in part on Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - for that attorney’s failure to utilize time- and expense-saving technology.
Rule 1 now charges all participants in the legal system to ensure the “just, speedy and inexpensive” resolution of disputes. In today’s litigation environment, a lawyer managing a case in discovery needs robust technological competence to meet that charge. However, the legal industry is slow to adopt technology, favoring “tried and true” methods over efficiency. This conflict is …
Roadblocks To Access To Justice: Reforming Ethical Rules To Meet The Special Needs Of Low-Income Clients, Louis S. Rulli
Roadblocks To Access To Justice: Reforming Ethical Rules To Meet The Special Needs Of Low-Income Clients, Louis S. Rulli
All Faculty Scholarship
The nation’s growing justice gap has left the poor with far too little access to legal representation, even in the most serious of civil matters. With poverty rates approaching their highest levels in the last fifty years, the poor struggle to hold on to their homes, their jobs, and their families, frequently overmatched by superior resources and an abundance of opposing lawyers representing corporations, government, and well-heeled interests. Non-profit lawyers struggle to provide limited assistance to the poor in high volume, community settings, or in courtroom corridors and on telephone hot lines. It is in these non-traditional settings that lawyers …
Advocacy Revalued, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Dana A. Remus
Advocacy Revalued, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Dana A. Remus
All Faculty Scholarship
A central and ongoing debate among legal ethics scholars addresses the moral positioning of adversarial advocacy. Most participants in this debate focus on the structure of our legal system and the constituent role of the lawyer-advocate. Many are highly critical, arguing that the core structure of adversarial advocacy is the root cause of many instances of lawyer misconduct. In this Article, we argue that these scholars’ focuses are misguided. Through reflection on Aristotle’s treatise, Rhetoric, we defend advocacy in our legal system’s litigation process as ethically positive and as pivotal to fair and effective dispute resolution. We recognize that advocacy …
Toward A Revised 4.2 No-Contact Rule, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Toward A Revised 4.2 No-Contact Rule, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Responsibilities Of Judges And Advocates In Civil And Common Law: Some Lingering Misconceptions Concerning Civil Lawsuits, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Angelo Dondi
Responsibilities Of Judges And Advocates In Civil And Common Law: Some Lingering Misconceptions Concerning Civil Lawsuits, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., Angelo Dondi
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Captive Courts: The Destruction Of Judicial Decisions By Agreement Of The Parties, Jill E. Fisch
Captive Courts: The Destruction Of Judicial Decisions By Agreement Of The Parties, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.