Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- MDL (2)
- 1407 (1)
- CAFA (1)
- CPLR (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
-
- Class Action Fairness Act (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Day in court (1)
- General jurisdiction (1)
- Hansberry v. Lee (1)
- International shoe (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Licci (1)
- Litigation dynamics (1)
- Long-arm jurisdiction (1)
- Minimum contacts (1)
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. (1)
- Multi-District Litigation process (1)
- Multidistrict litigation (1)
- New york (1)
- Personal jurisdiction (1)
- Philips Petroleum v. Shutts (1)
- Remand (1)
- Serial certification (1)
- Transaction of business (1)
- Transfer (1)
- Transferee judges (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Seeking Justice In The Empire State: Court Of Appeals Broadens The Reach Of Long Arm Jurisdiction And Clarifies The Statutory Guidelines For Application Of Cplr Section 302(A)(1), Jay C. Carlisle
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This article will discuss developments in long-arm jurisdiction under CPLR section 302(a)(1)1 and analyze the recent New York State Court of Appeals‘s thoughtful and instructive decision in Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL. Licci decided the question of whether a non-domiciliary‘s maintenance of a bank account in New York constituted a “transaction of business” out of which the plaintiff‘s claims arose under the state‘s long-arm statute. The Licci plaintiffs had alleged that the defendant funded a terrorist organization responsible for the injuries and deaths of certain plaintiffs and decedents they represented. The Licci opinion did not decide …
Remanding Multidistrict Litigation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Remanding Multidistrict Litigation, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Multidistrict litigation has frequently been described as a “black hole” because transfer is typically a one-way ticket. The numbers lend truth to this proposition. As of 2010, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation remanded only 3.425% of cases to their original districts. That number dwindled to 3.1% in 2012, and to a scant 2.9% in 2013. Retaining cases in hopes of forcing a global settlement can cause a constellation of complications. These concerns range from procedural justice issues over selecting a forum and correcting error, to substantive concerns about fidelity to state laws, to undermining democratic participation ideals fulfilled through …
Resoling International Shoe, Donald L. Doernberg
Resoling International Shoe, Donald L. Doernberg
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Goodyear Dunlop Tire Operations, S.A. v. Brown and Daimler AG v. Bauman sharply restricted general jurisdiction over corporations, limiting it to a corporation’s (1) state of incorporation, (2) state of principal place of business, or (3) another state where the corporation is “essentially at home.” The Court analogized the first two categories to an individual’s domicile. The Court made clear that the third category is very small, leading Justice Sotomayor, in her opinion concurring in the judgment, to charge that the Court had made many corporations “too big for general jurisdiction.” It is noteworthy that although the Court used the …
Multiple Attempts At Class Certification, Tobias Barrington Wolff
Multiple Attempts At Class Certification, Tobias Barrington Wolff
All Faculty Scholarship
The phenomenon of multiple attempts at class certification -- when class counsel file the same putative class action in multiple successive courts and attempt to secure an order of certification despite previous denials of the same request -- has always presented a vexing analytical puzzle. When the Supreme Court rejected one proposed solution to that problem in Smith v. Bayer, it left unresolved some of the broader questions of preclusion doctrine, federal common law, and the constraints of due process with which any satisfying approach will have to grapple.
This essay was solicited as a reply to a recent …