Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Courts (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Jurisdictional (2)
- Abstention (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Equitable (1)
- Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Federal question (1)
- Grable (1)
- Health care (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Mottley (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Removal (1)
- Rules (1)
- Sebelius (1)
- Standards (1)
- Tolling (1)
- Well-pleaded (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Amicus Brief In Support Of Neither Party In Sebelius V. Auburn Reg. Med. Ctr., No. 11-1231, Scott Dodson
Amicus Brief In Support Of Neither Party In Sebelius V. Auburn Reg. Med. Ctr., No. 11-1231, Scott Dodson
Scott Dodson
This amicus brief in support of neither party in the merits case of Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center, No. 11-1231, urges the Supreme Court to decide the question presented (whether 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a)(3) permits equitable tolling) without resort to jurisdictional labels.
The Timeliness Of Removal And Multiple-Defendant Lawsuits, Paul Lund
The Timeliness Of Removal And Multiple-Defendant Lawsuits, Paul Lund
Paul Lund
Although the procedure for removing cases from state to federal court has existed for nearly 225 years, removal remains one of the most controversial aspects of federal jurisdictional law. Each year, more than 30,000 civil cases are removed from state to federal court, and many of those cases involve more than one defendant. One of the most frequently litigated issues in these cases has involved when the notice of removal must be filed. Prior to a recent amendment, the statute governing removal, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), required that a notice of removal be filed within thirty days of service on …
Structuring Jurisdictional Rules And Standards, Scott Dodson, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Structuring Jurisdictional Rules And Standards, Scott Dodson, Elizabeth Mccuskey
Scott Dodson