Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Patent (2)
- Settlement (2)
- 131 S. Ct. 2780 (2011) (1)
- 131 S. Ct. 2846 (2011) (1)
- 282 P. 3d 867 (Or. 2012) (1)
-
- 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (1)
- 355 U.S. 220 (1957) (1)
- 357 U.S. 235 (1958) (1)
- 433 U.S. 186 (1977) (1)
- 436 U.S. 84 (1978) (1)
- 465 U.S. 783 (1984) (1)
- 47 F. Supp. 2d 812 (E.D. Tex. 1999) (1)
- 480 U.S. 102 (1987) (1)
- 95 U.S. 714 (1877) (1)
- Accountability for foreign defendants (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. Ltd v. Superior Court (1)
- Biosciences (1)
- Calder v. Jones (1)
- Calder-effect jurisdiction (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Cole v. Tobacco Institute (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Counterfeit products (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Drugs (1)
- FTC (1)
- FTC Act (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Federal trade commission (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Actavis And Error Costs: A Reply To Critics, Aaron S. Edlin, C. Scott Hemphill, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Carl Shapiro
Actavis And Error Costs: A Reply To Critics, Aaron S. Edlin, C. Scott Hemphill, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Carl Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. provided fundamental guidance about how courts should handle antitrust challenges to reverse payment patent settlements. In our previous article, Activating Actavis, we identified and operationalized the essential features of the Court’s analysis. Our analysis has been challenged by four economists, who argue that our approach might condemn procompetitive settlements.
As we explain in this reply, such settlements are feasible, however, only under special circumstances. Moreover, even where feasible, the parties would not actually choose such a settlement in equilibrium. These considerations, and others discussed in the reply, serve to …
In Personam And Beyond The Grasp: In Search Of Jurisdiction And Accountability For Foreign Defendants, Andrew F. Popper
In Personam And Beyond The Grasp: In Search Of Jurisdiction And Accountability For Foreign Defendants, Andrew F. Popper
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Determining The Location Of Injury For New York's Long Arm Statute In An Infringement Claim, Stefan Josephs
Determining The Location Of Injury For New York's Long Arm Statute In An Infringement Claim, Stefan Josephs
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Re Mstg And The Shifting Role Of Litigation-Related Patent Licenses In Reasonable Royalty Rate Determinations, Whitney Levandusky
In Re Mstg And The Shifting Role Of Litigation-Related Patent Licenses In Reasonable Royalty Rate Determinations, Whitney Levandusky
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Aggregating Defendants, Greg Reilly
Aggregating Defendants, Greg Reilly
Faculty Scholarship
No procedural topic has garnered more attention in the past fifty years than the class action and aggregation of plaintiffs. Yet, almost nothing has been written about aggregating defendants. This topic is of increasing importance. Recent efforts by patent “trolls” and Bit- Torrent copyright plaintiffs to aggregate unrelated defendants for similar but independent acts of infringement have provoked strong opposition from defendants, courts, and even Congress. The visceral resistance to defendant aggregation is puzzling. The aggregation of similarly situated plaintiffs is seen as creating benefits for both plaintiffs and the judicial system. The benefits that justify plaintiff aggregation also seem …
Preliminary Injunctions Post-Mayo And Myriad, Jacob S. Sherkow
Preliminary Injunctions Post-Mayo And Myriad, Jacob S. Sherkow
Articles & Chapters
The Supreme Court's recent interest in patentable subject matter has had several, unexpected downstream effects on preliminary injunctions in patent disputes.
The Supreme Court has recently expressed increased interest in patent eligibility, or patentable subject matter, the doctrine that limits the types of inventions eligible for patenting. Its two decisions, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., in 2012, and Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., in 2013, represented the first broad restrictions on patentable subject matter in over thirty years. And later this term, the Court will decide yet another patent eligibility case: Alice Corp. v. CLS …
Inhibiting Patent Trolling: A New Approach For Applying Rule 11 (Working Paper), Young Jeon, Eric J. Rogers
Inhibiting Patent Trolling: A New Approach For Applying Rule 11 (Working Paper), Young Jeon, Eric J. Rogers
Youngsik Jeon
The existing Rule 11 of the FRCP can be immediately harnessed to help solve the patent troll, nuisance-lawsuit problem. Currently there is the perception that too many litigious entities, commonly referred to as “patent trolls,” are creating too much dead-weight economic waste in society. The popular view is that there has been an alarming rise in the number of patent trolls that make no products but try to monetize patents by filing dubious patent infringement lawsuits merely to extract money from commercially productive companies that actually make products and use technologies for society’s benefit. Defining “patent troll” is probably too …