Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Standing To Sue In Another's Shoes: Can An Assignee Of An Accrued Copyright Infringement Claim With No Other Interest In The Copyright Itself Sue For The Infringement?, Wenjie Li
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
La Cesión De Derechos En El Código Civil Peruano, Edward Ivan Cueva
La Cesión De Derechos En El Código Civil Peruano, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
La Cesión de Derechos en el Código Civil Peruano
Segundo Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Segundo Congreso Nacional De Organismos Públicos Autónomos, Bruno L. Costantini García
Bruno L. Costantini García
Memorias del Segundo Congreso Nacional de Organismos Públicos Autónomos. "Autonomía, Profesionalización, Control y Transparencia"
Algunos Apuntes En Torno A La Prescripción Extintiva Y La Caducidad, Edward Ivan Cueva
Algunos Apuntes En Torno A La Prescripción Extintiva Y La Caducidad, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule 50: Medium Rare Application? Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. V. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., Leslie Eanes
Federal Rule 50: Medium Rare Application? Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. V. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., Leslie Eanes
Mercer Law Review
The year 2006 marked a historical year for the now seventy-year-old Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50. In addition to an overhaul of the statutory language, which, absent contrary congressional action, became codified December 1, 2006, the Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. In what seems to be a straightforward procedural dictate from the High Court, Unitherm has actually resulted in confusion among federal circuits anxious to follow its precedent.