Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Tc Heartland Llc V. Kraft Foods Group Brands And The Big Debate About East Texas: How A Delaware Case Leaves Patent Venue Unsettled And Presages As Applied Challenges To The Constitutionality Of Narrow Venue Interpretations, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2017), Jesse Snyder
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Lack of sanguinity for patent holders was manifest after the Supreme Court’s May 22, 2017, opinion in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC. Yet whether TC Heartland—a case from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware—represents a fait accompli against forum shopping remains debatable. Writing for the Court in a unanimous opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s interpretation that an intervening amendment to the general venue statute broadened the scope of venue for patent cases. The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), provides that “[a]ny civil …
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge Versus Jury On The Scales Of Justice: 35 U.S.C. 112, 6 Equivalents In The Balance, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 833 (1999), Robert N. Young
Judge Versus Jury On The Scales Of Justice: 35 U.S.C. 112, 6 Equivalents In The Balance, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 833 (1999), Robert N. Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Issue Preclusion - Recognizing Foreign Judgments In United States Patent Infringement Suits: A New Approach, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 627 (1993), James P. Muraff
Issue Preclusion - Recognizing Foreign Judgments In United States Patent Infringement Suits: A New Approach, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 627 (1993), James P. Muraff
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Revolution In Preliminary Injunctions Against Patent Infringement, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 225 (1990), Thomas L. Creel, Donna M. Praiss
The Revolution In Preliminary Injunctions Against Patent Infringement, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 225 (1990), Thomas L. Creel, Donna M. Praiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.