Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Attorneys (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Civil cases (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
-
- Death penalty (1)
- Exxon Shipping Company v. Baker (1)
- German civil justice (1)
- German civil law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Jury awards (1)
- Jury discretion (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Media (1)
- Model Penal Code (1)
- Monetary damages (1)
- Philip Morris v. Williams (1)
- Punitive damages (1)
- Relationstechnik (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Trial by jury (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Civil Law
Punitive Damages Vs. The Death Penalty: In Search Of A Unified Approach To Jury Discretion And Due Process Of Law, José F. Anderson
Punitive Damages Vs. The Death Penalty: In Search Of A Unified Approach To Jury Discretion And Due Process Of Law, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
The role of the jury in awarding monetary damages to plaintiffs in a wide range of civil cases has captured the attention of the media, contemporary non-fiction writers, and reform-minded politicians in recent years. Particular attention has been focused on huge jury awards, which has led many commentators to criticize the wisdom of permitting juries to move so much money from one place to another. Although the right to a jury trial, and with it the exercise of broad judicial discretion, is constitutionally based, many reform efforts have moved toward removing juries from cases both as to the subject matter …
Imagining Judges That Apply Law: How They Might Do It, James Maxeiner
Imagining Judges That Apply Law: How They Might Do It, James Maxeiner
All Faculty Scholarship
"Judges should apply the law, not make it." That plea appears perennially in American politics. American legal scholars belittle it as a simple-minded demand that is silly and misleading. A glance beyond our shores dispels the notion that the American public is naive to expect judges to apply rather than to make law.
American obsession with judicial lawmaking has its price: indifference to judicial law applying. If truth be told, practically we have no method for judges, as a matter of routine, to apply law to facts. Our failure leads American legal scholars to question whether applying law to facts …