Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
Corporate Ethics: Approaches And Implications To Expanding The Corporate Mindset Of Profitability, 49 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 637 (2018), Arthur Acevedo
Corporate Ethics: Approaches And Implications To Expanding The Corporate Mindset Of Profitability, 49 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 637 (2018), Arthur Acevedo
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This Article discusses the convergence of law and ethics in the context of corporations. It begins by detailing past attempts at and limitations on regulating corporate conduct. It then explores the business judgment rule in the context of ethical conduct. Finally, it considers the growing influence of millennials and social investing on corporate conduct, and concludes by cautioning corporate directors to adopt ethical practices in order to remain relevant in the marketplace.
Standards Of Practice For Pension Practitioners, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 667 (2006), David Pratt
Standards Of Practice For Pension Practitioners, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 667 (2006), David Pratt
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Inherent Attorney Conflicts Of Interest Under Erisa: Using The Model Rules Of Professional Conduct To Discourage Joint Representation Of Dual Role Fiduciaries, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 721 (2006), Paul M. Secunda
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules Of Or Substantive Law: Who Controls An Individual's Right To Choose A Lawyer In Today's Corporate Environment, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1265 (2005), Joan Colson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remands In Trade Adjustment Assistance Cases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 9 (2005), Munford Page Hall Ii
Remands In Trade Adjustment Assistance Cases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 9 (2005), Munford Page Hall Ii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Does Optrex Mean For The Customs Bar?, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 23 (2005), John B. Pellegrini
What Does Optrex Mean For The Customs Bar?, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 23 (2005), John B. Pellegrini
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
Optrex And The Attorney-Client Privilege: Implications And Potential Significance, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2005), Sandra Liss Friedman, Helena D. Sullivan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Importer's Election: Whether To Invoke Attorney Advice In Defense Or To Preserve Privilege, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 17 (2005), Patricia M. Mccarthy
An Importer's Election: Whether To Invoke Attorney Advice In Defense Or To Preserve Privilege, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 17 (2005), Patricia M. Mccarthy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Multiple Directorships: The Fiduciary Duties And Conflicts Of Interest That Arise When One Individual Serves More Than One Corporation, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561 (2000), John K. Wells
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promoting The Intermediate Benefits Of Strict Notary Regulation, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 819 (1998), Nancy Perkins Spyke
Promoting The Intermediate Benefits Of Strict Notary Regulation, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 819 (1998), Nancy Perkins Spyke
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Public Official Role Of The Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 651 (1998), Michael L. Closen
The Public Official Role Of The Notary, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 651 (1998), Michael L. Closen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Third Party Liability Or The False Claims Act: It Is Time For Consultants To Pay The Price For Their Bad Advice, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 923 (1996), Neal A. Cooper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In-House Counsel Access To Confidential Information Produced During Discovery In Intellectual Property Litigation, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 657 (1994), Louis S. Sorell
In-House Counsel Access To Confidential Information Produced During Discovery In Intellectual Property Litigation, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 657 (1994), Louis S. Sorell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.