Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Environmental Protection Agency; EPA; Triplespeak; Utilities; Utility Companies; Securities Exchange Commission; SEC; Clean Power Plan; CO2 Emissions; Electricity; Electric Power; Conservative; Libertarian; Progressive; Investor-Owned Utilities; IOU; Corporate Social Responsibility; CSR Report; Moral Psychology; Disclosures (1)
- Pregancy Discrimination Act; Parental Leave; Parental Leave Policy; Title VII; Men; Parental Leave for Men; Title VII Claim; EEOC; Parental Bonding Leave; Employment Discrimination; Pregnancy-Related Disability Leave; Childbirth; Estee Lauder; JP Morgan; Family Medical Leave Act; Disability Period; Caregiver Leave; Primary Caregiver; Secondary Caregiver (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
Dads Are Parents, Too: Why Amending The Pregnancy Discrimination Act Is Necessary For Courts To Determine If A Parental Leave Policy Violates Title Vii, Krista Gay
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
To attract millennials desiring a work-life balance, large companies have begun to offer new parent leave to both male and female employees and commonly offer longer leave to women than men. Although a company may offer pregnancy disability leave to women without offering similar leave to men, if the company classifies the leave as parental bonding leave, it must be offered equally. If it is not, as highlighted by recent lawsuits against JP Morgan and Estée Lauder, a Title VII claim can arise. Historically, courts have had difficulty deciding if such a policy does in fact violate Title VII, because …
Essay: Corporate Triplespeak: Responses By Investor-Owned Utilities To The Epa’S Proposed Clean Power Plan, Alan R. Palmiter
Essay: Corporate Triplespeak: Responses By Investor-Owned Utilities To The Epa’S Proposed Clean Power Plan, Alan R. Palmiter
Brooklyn Law Review
During the year following the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan to regulate CO2 emissions in the power sector, the largest investor-owned electric utilities engaged in a curious triplespeak. Employing the moral language of political conservatives, the utilities focused on whether and how the EPA had transgressed its “traditional” regulatory role, thus altering the “structure” of energy federalism and potentially “degrading” orderly power supplies. In disclosure filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the utilities used the moral language of political libertarians, focusing on the “financial risks” that federal government “intervention” poses to efficient power “markets” and to the “freedom” of …