Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- 547 (1)
- 548 (1)
- Avoidance of forced sales (1)
- Avoidance powers (1)
- BFP (1)
-
- BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp (1)
- Bankruptcy courts (1)
- Cannabis (1)
- Chapter 11 (1)
- Circuit Split (1)
- Controlled Substances Act (1)
- Fair market value (1)
- Federal Rules (1)
- Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (1)
- Forced sales (1)
- Fraudulent conveyances (1)
- Marijuana (1)
- Mortgage (1)
- Pre-bankruptcy-petition transfers (1)
- Preferential transfers (1)
- Proof of Claim (1)
- Reasonably equivalent value (1)
- Rule 23 (1)
- Rule 7023 (1)
- Rule 9013 (1)
- State foreclosure law (1)
- Tax foreclosure sale (1)
- Tenth Circuit (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Bankruptcy Law
Weed Like Our Money Back: Amending Pennsylvania’S Medical Cannabis Law For Insolvent Cannabusinesses, Nikolajs V. Gaikis
Weed Like Our Money Back: Amending Pennsylvania’S Medical Cannabis Law For Insolvent Cannabusinesses, Nikolajs V. Gaikis
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 2016, Pennsylvania joined what is now 37 states and the District of Columbia in legalizing medical cannabis. The Commonwealth’s cannabusinesses share in a struggle that is common in other legal jurisdictions: operating within the confines of the Controlled Substances Act and the Bankruptcy Code. Insolvent individuals and businesses that profit from cannabis or hold cannabis assets cannot declare bankruptcy because cannabis is a Schedule I drug. Under state law, other insolvency alternatives like an assignment for the benefit of creditors, receiverships, and compositions with creditors exist as potential alternatives.
Pennsylvania’s insolvent cannabusinesses are in a uniquely poor position because …
It’S Worth Whatever Someone Paid For It: How Courts Have Misinterpreted Bfp’S Reasoning, Jacob Ryder
It’S Worth Whatever Someone Paid For It: How Courts Have Misinterpreted Bfp’S Reasoning, Jacob Ryder
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Historically, bankruptcy courts have used the Bankruptcy Code’s avoidance powers—fraudulent conveyances in § 548 and preferential transfers in § 547—to avoid pre-bankruptcy-petition transfers. These avoidance powers were used even when the transfer in question was a mortgage or tax foreclosure sale. This has changed in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp. The BFP Court concluded that § 548 could not be used to avoid a mortgage foreclosure sale that complied with state foreclosure law. To do so, the Court had to interpret the operative language in § 548: “reasonably equivalent value.” The Court …
Bankruptcy’S Class Act: Class Proofs Of Claim In Chapter 11, Tori Remington
Bankruptcy’S Class Act: Class Proofs Of Claim In Chapter 11, Tori Remington
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
When a business files for protection under Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it must begin to pay off its debt by reorganizing or liquidating its assets. Oftentimes, both processes include terminating employees to reduce the business’s expenditures. As a result of these terminations, former employees might file a “class proof of claim” against the business to preserve any claims of unpaid wages or violations of federal law.
Whether a group may file a class proof of claim against a debtor in bankruptcy remains unclear. The Tenth Circuit has rejected the class proof of claim in bankruptcy. The remaining circuit courts that have …