Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons^™

Municipal Defenses To Antitrust Liability, Patrick R. James

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Individual Coercion Doctrine And Tying Agreements: An Economic Analysis, Roger D. Blair, Jeffrey Finci

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Decisions, Timothy J. Peaden, Charles S. Baugh, Marc W. Joseph, Melissa Q. Windham

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Antitrust--Noerr-Pennington Extends Immunity from Sherman Act to Foreign Litigation and Foreign Acts that result in Alleged Antitrust Violations, Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. Hunt, 694 F.2d 1358 (5th Cir. 1983).

Antitrust--Foreign Import Cartels are Liable under the Sherman Act although domestic export competitors are shielded with a Webb-Pomerene exemption. Daishowa International v. North Coast Export Co., 1982-2 Trade Cas.64,774 (N.D. Cal.).

State Action Immunity And Preemption In Antitrust Challenges To State Pricing Laws: Alcoholic Beverage Control Board V. Taylor Drug Stores, Inc., Randy Donald Shaw

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Books Received, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Emerging Financial Centers: Legal and Institutional Framework

Edited by Robert C. Effros

Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1982. Pp. xvi, 1150. $35.00.

==============

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

By George C. Greanias and Duane Windsor

Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath and Co.,1982. Pp. ix, 187. $23.95.

==================

Foreign Commerce and the Antitrust Laws Vols. I-II.

By Wilbur L. Fugate

Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1982. Vol. I, pp. xxiv, 427; vol. II, pp. xxiv, 460. $100.00.

====================

The Fund Agreement in the Courts: Volume II.

By Joseph Gold

Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1982. Pp.xii, 499. $17.50.

=================

International Capital …

Alternative Approaches To Municipal Antitrust Liability, Martin Cronin

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Comment argues that preemption analysis, applied when federal statutes conflict with state or municipal enactments, should be used by the courts in applying the Parker doctrine to municipalities. Alternatively, this Comment advocates a qualified municipal exemption from the antitrust laws. Since municipalities receive less federal deference than states, this exemption should not be coextensive with that enjoyed by states under the Parker doctrine. However, the preferential treatment that municipalities receive in our federalist system as compared to private parties mandates formulation of a municipal exemption. Constitutional and practical difficulties encountered under substantive antitrust law, and at the remedies stage, …

Antitrust And American Business Abroad, By James R. Atwood And Kingman Brewster, Ernest C. Stiefel, Peter Fuerle

Maryland Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.