Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Employee Standing Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act, Michigan Law Review
Employee Standing Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note will focus on the confusion that plagues one category of antitrust standing cases, those in which an employee alleges wrongful discharge for his refusal to participate in a scheme that violates the antitrust laws. Conflicts among the circuits in their analysis and resolution of these employee standing cases have not been definitively settled by the Supreme Court's recent pronouncements on the right to seek recovery under section 4. This Note argues that these recent Supreme Court decisions, as well as the policies behind the antitrust laws, weigh in favor of permitting an employee to maintain a section 4 …
Right To Sue Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act - The Employee Deischarged For Regusal To Participate In The Anitcompetivie Practices Of His Employer: Bichan V. Chemetron Corp. Examined In Light Of Blue Shield V. Mcready, Ralph N. Bryson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.