Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Anti-money laundering (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bitcoin (1)
- Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructure (1)
-
- Compatibility (1)
- Competition (1)
- Copyright misuse (1)
- Cryptocurrencies (1)
- DSC Communications v. DGI Technologies (1)
- Decentralized Internet payment protocol (1)
- Estoppel (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Foreign-exchange transactions (1)
- Gateways (1)
- Google (1)
- Huber (Peter) (1)
- Information (1)
- Internet (1)
- Know your customer (1)
- Lasercomb v. Reynolds (1)
- Law and Disorder in Cyberspace: Abolish the FCC and Let Common Law Rule the Telecosm (1)
- Lotus v Borland (1)
- Risks (1)
- Search engines (1)
- Settlement institutions (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Technology (1)
- Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1)
- Value transmitters (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Understanding And Regulating Twenty-First Century Payment Systems: The Ripple Case Study, Marcel T. Rosner, Andrew Kang
Understanding And Regulating Twenty-First Century Payment Systems: The Ripple Case Study, Marcel T. Rosner, Andrew Kang
Michigan Law Review
Ripple is an open-source Internet software that enables users to conduct payments across national boundaries in multiple currencies as seamlessly as sending an email. This decentralized Internet payment protocol could provide a cure to an inefficient cross-border payments system. Although Ripple’s technology can reduce significant risks and costs that exist in the internationalpayments system, regulators should adopt a new regulatory framework that responds to how this technology works. This Note performs two functions to help regulators realize this goal. It first helps regulators and other market participants understand how Ripple operates by explaining what Ripple is and comparing it to …
Stop Being Evil: A Proposal For Unbiased Google Search, Joshua G. Hazan
Stop Being Evil: A Proposal For Unbiased Google Search, Joshua G. Hazan
Michigan Law Review
Since its inception in the late 1990s, Google has done as much as anyone to create an "open internet." Thanks to Google's unparalleled search algorithms, anyone's ideas can be heard, and all kinds of information are easier than ever to find. As Google has extended its ambition beyond its core function, however it has conducted itself in a manner that now threatens the openness and diversity of the same internet ecosystem that it once championed. By promoting its own content and vertical search services above all others, Google places a significant obstacle in the path of its competitors. This handicap …
Copyright Misuse And Modified Copyleft: New Solutions To The Challenges Of Internet Standardization, Chip Patterson
Copyright Misuse And Modified Copyleft: New Solutions To The Challenges Of Internet Standardization, Chip Patterson
Michigan Law Review
The Internet is a truly global community within which myriad economic, social and technological forces interplay to cause its standardization. Much of the competition in the industry has revolved around which product will become the standard for a given market sector. Some markets have seen victors; for example, TCP/IP is the Internet communication protocol, MP3 appears to be dominating music compression, and Microsoft Corporation's Windows ("Windows") is clearly the standard operating system. Similarly, the Internet must adopt a standard for web browsing and searching, for email, and for web programming. In many cases, the competition for this standard will be …
The Common Law In Cyberspace, Tom W. Bell
The Common Law In Cyberspace, Tom W. Bell
Michigan Law Review
Wrong in interesting ways, counts for high praise among academics. Peter Huber's stirring new book, Law and Disorder in Cyberspace, certainly merits acclaim by that standard. The very subtitle of the book, Abolish the FCC and Let Common Law Rule the Telecosm, announces the daring arguments to follow. A book so bold could hardly fail to make some stimulating errors, the most provocative of which this review discusses. Thanks to his willingness to challenge musty doctrines of telecommunications law and policy, moreover, Huber gets a great deal right. Law and Disorder in Cyberspace argues at length that the Federal Communications …