Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
![Digital Commons Network](http://assets.bepress.com/20200205/img/dcn/DCsunburst.png)
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Banking and Finance (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Economic integration (1)
- European Union (1)
- First Amendment (1)
-
- Free exercise (1)
- Free movement of capital (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Trade (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- RICO (1)
- Religion (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Retirement Security (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Sincerity (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Sports (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Strength of belief (1)
- Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift (1)
- Taxation-Federal Income (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
The Free Movement Of Capital In Europe: Is The European Court Of Justice Living Up To Its Framers' Intent And Setting An Example For The World?, Jarrod Tudor
Jarrod Tudor
The benefits to free movement of international financial flows are numerous but include an efficient asset market and the opportunity for economic growth and development for countries engaged in an agreement allowing for such freedom. The free movement of capital is one of the four pillars of the Treaty on the Function of the European Union (TFEU) along with the free movement of goods, services, and labor. Article 63 of the TFEU prohibits limitations on the free movement of capital while Article 65 of the TFEU allows for some exceptions. Not only does the free movement of capital doctrine suppose …
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Definitions, Religion, And Free Exercise Guarantees, Mark Strasser
Mark Strasser
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. Non-religious practices do not receive those same protections, which makes the ability to distinguish between religious and non-religious practices important. Regrettably, members of the Court have been unable to agree about how to distinguish the religious from the non-religious—sometimes, the implicit criteria focus on the sincerity of the beliefs, sometimes the strength of the beliefs or the role that they play in an individual’s life, and sometimes the kind of beliefs. In short, the Court has virtually guaranteed an incoherent jurisprudence by sending contradictory signals with …