Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
An Assessment Of State And Federal Jurisdiction To Regulate Access Charges After The At&T Divestiture, Jeffery A. Robinson
An Assessment Of State And Federal Jurisdiction To Regulate Access Charges After The At&T Divestiture, Jeffery A. Robinson
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cellular Mobile Radio Telecommunications: Regulating And Emgerging Industry, Phillip Palmer
Cellular Mobile Radio Telecommunications: Regulating And Emgerging Industry, Phillip Palmer
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal And State Roles In Telecommunications: The Effects Of Deregulation, Eli M. Noam
Federal And State Roles In Telecommunications: The Effects Of Deregulation, Eli M. Noam
Vanderbilt Law Review
During the past decade, federal telecommunications regulatory policy has changed its focus from a goal of universally available and affordable residential service to one of economic efficiency. In changing its regulatory focus, the federal government has indirectly deprived the states of the means to accomplish their goal, which remains one of insuring universally available and affordable residential service. In his Article Professor Noam examines the evolution of the traditional federal-state coregulatory system, contrasts the emerging federal regulatory approach with the states' policies, and discusses the reasons for federal predominance in telecommunications regulation.He argues that the reorientation in federal regulatory policy …
A Free Press: The Forgotten Issue In Home Placement V. Providence Journal, Robert J. Curran
A Free Press: The Forgotten Issue In Home Placement V. Providence Journal, Robert J. Curran
Seattle University Law Review
This Note demonstrates that the court's decision in Home Placement did infringe upon protected first amendment activity. Since free speech and free press guarantees were threatened by the government's action, the court should have balanced the competing interests and held in favor of Home Placement only upon a showing of a compelling state interest. After examining the interests of the advertiser, the reader, the government, and the newspaper, this Note concludes that the newspaper's right to control its message and to make editorial decisions free from the threat of governmental interference overbalance the antitrust claim made in this case. A …