Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust Division (1)
- Astroturfing (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
-
- Competition (1)
- Conflicts of interest (1)
- Congress (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Corporate-funded preferences (1)
- Criminal Division (1)
- Criminal liability (1)
- Criminal prosecution of corporations (1)
- Deferred prosecution (1)
- Deterrent value (1)
- Disclosure rules (1)
- Expressive theory (1)
- Expressive value (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Global financial crisis (1)
- IP (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Justice Department (1)
- Law (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Lobbyists (1)
- Marbury v. Madison’s (1)
- Mergers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation
The Proposed Separation Of Powers Restoration Act Goes Too Far, Jack M. Beermann
The Proposed Separation Of Powers Restoration Act Goes Too Far, Jack M. Beermann
Shorter Faculty Works
If passed, the Separation of Powers Restoration Act would require federal courts conducting judicial review of agency action to decide “de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions and rules.” Although I have long been highly critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Jack M. Beermann, End the Failed Chevron Experiment Now: How Chevron Has Failed and Why It Can and Should be Overruled, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 9 (2010), and also have misgivings about Auer deference, I fear that the proposed Act goes too far in completely eliminating deference to agency legal determinations.
Dueling Monologues On The Public Domain: What Digital Copyright Can Learn From Antitrust, Timothy K. Armstrong
Dueling Monologues On The Public Domain: What Digital Copyright Can Learn From Antitrust, Timothy K. Armstrong
The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal
This article, written for the inaugural volume of the University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal, explores the disconnect between contemporary United States intellectual property law and the often quite different consensus views of disinterested expert opinion. Questions concerning how copyright law treats the public domain (that is, uncopyrighted material) supply a lens for comparing the law as it stands with the law as scholars have suggested it should be. The ultimate goal is to understand why a quarter century of predominantly critical scholarship on intellectual property seems to have exerted such limited influence on Congress and …
Astroturf Campaigns: Transparency In Telecom Merger Review, Victoria Peng
Astroturf Campaigns: Transparency In Telecom Merger Review, Victoria Peng
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Large telecommunications companies looking to merge spend millions of dollars in their lobbying efforts to clear regulatory hurdles and obtain approval for their proposed mergers. Corporations such as AT&T, Comcast, and Time Warner use public participation processes as vehicles to influence regulatory decision-making. In the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) merger review context, the notice- and-comment process and public hearings have become fertile breeding grounds for hidden corporate influence. Corporations spend millions on corporate social responsibility programs and call upon nonprofit organizations that receive their largesse to represent their corporate interests as grassroots interests when the FCC seeks public comment. This …
The Food And Drug Administration Versus The Federal Trade Commission: Reconciling Their Interests In Regulating Homeopathic Products, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1193 (2016), Jordannah Bangi
UIC Law Review
This Comment suggests that the FDA should require homeopathic products to carry a disclaimer label similar to those used on prescription drugs or certain food or food products.
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution, David M. Uhlmann
The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution, David M. Uhlmann
Articles
Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and practitioners about the role of corporate criminal prosecution. Some argue that corporations should face criminal prosecution for their misconduct, while others would reserve criminal prosecution for individual corporate officials. Perhaps as a result of this conflict, there has been a dramatic increase over the last decade in the use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements for some corporate crimes, even as the government continues to bring criminal charges for other corporate crimes. To move beyond our erratic approach to corporate crime, we need a better …