Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Animal law (2)
- Animals (2)
- 16 U.S.C. (1)
- 50 C.F.R. (1)
- 9th Circuit (1)
-
- Agency action (1)
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (1)
- Animal resource deserts (1)
- Animal welfare (1)
- Barred owl (1)
- Bradley E. Tinker (1)
- Bradley Tinker (1)
- Case summary (1)
- Code of Federal Regulations (1)
- Collecting (1)
- Conservation (1)
- Convention (1)
- Convention on Migratory Species (1)
- District of Oregon (1)
- Donated (1)
- ESA (1)
- Endangered (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Endangered species (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Environmentalism (1)
- European eel (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Exterminated (1)
- Extermination (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Animal Law
Bringing The European Eel Back From The Brink: The Need For A New Agreement Under The Convention On Migratory Species, Chris Wold
Pace Environmental Law Review
The European eel is considered “Critically Endangered.” Its population has been declining due to overutilization, barriers to migration such as dams, pollution, and climate change. The international community has responded by including the European eel in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (“CITES”) to regulate international trade and Appendix II of the Convention on Migratory Species (“CMS”) to help improve the species conservation status. The EU has taken regional action to prohibit imports into and exports from EU Member States, although intra-EU trade is permissible. Despite these actions, the eel’s conservation status might not be …
Friends Of Animals V. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Bradley E. Tinker
Friends Of Animals V. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Bradley E. Tinker
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Friends of Animals v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, the Ninth Circuit held that the plain language of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act allows for the removal of one species of bird to benefit another species. Friends of Animals argued that the Service’s experiment permitting the taking of one species––the barred owl––to advance the conservation of a different species––the northern spotted owl––violated the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The court, however, found that the Act delegates broad implementing discretion to the Secretary of the Interior, and neither the Act nor the underlying international conventions limit the taking of …
Serving Pets In Poverty: A New Frontier For The Animal Welfare Movement, Amanda Arrington, Michael Markarian
Serving Pets In Poverty: A New Frontier For The Animal Welfare Movement, Amanda Arrington, Michael Markarian
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Editor's Note, Luke Trompeter, Ingrid Lesemann
Editor's Note, Luke Trompeter, Ingrid Lesemann
Sustainable Development Law & Policy
No abstract provided.