Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Service (2)
- Abalone (1)
- Administrative Procedure (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Agen viagra asli usa di bali (1)
-
- Agen viagra asli usa di denpasar (1)
- Agency's action (1)
- Arbitrary and capricious (1)
- Bison (1)
- Brucellosis (1)
- California Sea Urchin Commission v. Bean (1)
- California sea urchin commission (1)
- Chevron deference (1)
- Crow Indian Tribe (1)
- Delisting (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Distinct (1)
- District Court (1)
- District court (1)
- ESA (1)
- Endangered (1)
- Endangered Species (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Endangered species (1)
- Endangered species act (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Fish and Wildlife Service (1)
- Fish and wildlife service (1)
- Genetic (1)
- Greater Yellowstone (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Animal Law
Crow Indian Tribe V. United States, Hallee Kansman
Crow Indian Tribe V. United States, Hallee Kansman
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The protection status of the Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear continues to elicit debate and find its way into the courtroom. In Crow Indian Tribe v. United States, for the second time in the last decade, a court held the Service’s attempt to delist the Yellowstone Grizzly arbitrary and capricious. Specifically, the court found the Service’s evaluation of remnant populations, recalibration, and genetic health deficient. This case demonstrates the importance in and the resilient motivation behind preserving grizzly bear populations and genetics. As the practice of delisting a species under the Endangered Species Act continues, this case will provide important …
California Sea Urchin Commission V. Bean, Thomas C. Mooney-Myers
California Sea Urchin Commission V. Bean, Thomas C. Mooney-Myers
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In California Sea Urchin Commission v. Bean, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to end an experimental sea otter colony and translocation program. Commercial fishing groups sought reversal of the decision due to their interest in maintaining the translocation program which reduced otter predation on commercially valuable shellfish. While the Ninth Circuit held the group had standing, it then applied the Chevron test and determined the agency’s actions were reasonable.
Buffalo Field Campaign V. Zinke, Hallee C. Kansman
Buffalo Field Campaign V. Zinke, Hallee C. Kansman
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Despite years of litigation and legislation, the protection status of bison in and around Yellowstone National Park remains unsettled. Buffalo Field Campaign, a non-profit group, has spent decades spearheading the fight to list the species as either endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Buffalo Field Campaign v. Zinke tests the scope of agency directives and the strictness of the statutory language which guides agency actions.
Of Wild Beasts And Digital Analogues: The Legal Status Of Autonomous Systems, Matthew U. Scherer
Of Wild Beasts And Digital Analogues: The Legal Status Of Autonomous Systems, Matthew U. Scherer
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Agen Viagra Asli Usa 0821-6765-4444 Obat Tahan Lama Di Bali , Denpasar Cod, Rt Satu
Agen Viagra Asli Usa 0821-6765-4444 Obat Tahan Lama Di Bali , Denpasar Cod, Rt Satu
TOKO OBAT VITALITAS BALI