Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (16)
- State law; State administrative decision; (16)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Economics (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
-
- Law and Economics (4)
- Agency (3)
- Agriculture Law (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Dispute Resolution (3)
- Energy and Utilities Law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- General Law (3)
- Housing Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Land Use Planning (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Natural Resources Law (3)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (3)
- Practice and Procedure (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Accounting (2)
- Admiralty (2)
- Air and Space Law (2)
- Animal Law (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Arts and Entertainment (2)
- Banking and Finance (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Appeal No. 0766: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0766: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-89
Appeal No. 0765: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0765: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2005-111 and 2006-93
Appeal No. 0767: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0767: Rockwell Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-111 and 2006-93
Appeal No. 0769: Circle G. Lazy K Ranch V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0769: Circle G. Lazy K Ranch V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-112 (David R. Hill, Inc.)
Appeal No. 0768: James W. & Patricia A. Best V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0768: James W. & Patricia A. Best V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-117 (Great Lakes Energy Partners, LLC)
Appeal No. 0759: D & L Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0759: D & L Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-65
Appeal No. 0757: William & Polly Chandler V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0757: William & Polly Chandler V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-57
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
Appeal No. 0761: A.W. Tipka Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0761: A.W. Tipka Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-80
Appeal No. 0742: B & B Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0742: B & B Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-88
Appeal No. 0756: Dalton Smith V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0756: Dalton Smith V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-36
Appeal No. 0758: John C. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0758: John C. Brown V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-56
Appeal No. 0760: A.W Tipka Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0760: A.W Tipka Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-76
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.
Appeal No. 0750: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0750: Paul A. Grim V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-20
Appeal No. 0755: Heartland Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0755: Heartland Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-99
Appeal No. 0754: Valley Petroleum Management V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0754: Valley Petroleum Management V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-81
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This …
Appeal No. 0753: Kerogen Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0753: Kerogen Resources, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2005-54
Runoff And Reality: Externalities, Economics, And Traceability Issues In Urban Runoff Regulation, Donald J. Kochan
Runoff And Reality: Externalities, Economics, And Traceability Issues In Urban Runoff Regulation, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
It has long eluded regulators and private enforcers how to control the imposition of negative externalities. This paper will examine: (1) Whether existing authorities (like the Clean Water Act) are capable of providing regulation of urban runoff; (2) Whether, in light of economic controls, regulation of these activities are necessary; (3) A summary of recent runoff litigation; and (4) What is next; what should be next? Although each of these questions form background, the primary emphasis currently anticipated for this presentation is on traceability, collective action, and free rider problems that motivate regulation in this area. Often runoff is described …