Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Agency (1)
- Applied Mathematics (1)
- Business (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations (1)
- Organizational Behavior and Theory (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Science and Technology Policy (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Statistics and Probability (1)
- Technology and Innovation (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Procedures (1)
- Allowance Error (1)
- America Invents Act (1)
- Independent Offices Appropriations Act (1)
- Information Quality Act (1)
-
- Litigation costs (1)
- Non-Practicing Entity (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent Abolition (1)
- Patent Assertion Entity (1)
- Patent Law & Policy - Articles (1)
- Patent Law & Policy - Briefs in legal proceedings (1)
- Patent Law & Policy - Panel Moderation & Speeches (1)
- Patent Quality (1)
- Patent Registration System (1)
- Patent Troll (1)
- Patent examination (1)
- Rejection Error (1)
- Social Costs (1)
- U.S. Patent Office (1)
- User fees (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
A Federal Information Quality Act Challenge To The White House “Patent Troll” Report, Ron D. Katznelson
A Federal Information Quality Act Challenge To The White House “Patent Troll” Report, Ron D. Katznelson
Ron D. Katznelson
Government-disseminated information is unlike that of private parties or non-government entities’ information on the internet or in academic journals, with varying degrees of accuracy and reliability. Because the public disproportionately relies on information disseminated by the government, the government holds itself to substantially higher quality standards. Congress enacted the Information Quality Act (“IQA”) in order to ensure that information disseminated by government agencies meet the standards of “quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity.” 44 U.S.C. § 3516, note. Information disseminated by the government upon which the government and the public rely must be “presented in an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased …
The U.S. Patent Office’S Proposed Fees Under The America Invents Act—Part I: The Scope Of The Office’S Fee-Setting Authority, Ron D. Katznelson
The U.S. Patent Office’S Proposed Fees Under The America Invents Act—Part I: The Scope Of The Office’S Fee-Setting Authority, Ron D. Katznelson
Ron D. Katznelson
This two-part article discusses the Patent and Trademark Office’s recent proposed rulemaking setting new patent user fees. In Part I the author argues that the PTO can raise fees in accordance with its aggregate costs but lacks authority to set national patent policies, or to skew certain fees to discourage or encourage a particular service. The author also asserts that the America Invents Act does not vest with the PTO discretion to set the level of its operating reserve – a determination reserved solely for congressional appropriations. In an upcoming Part II, the author will discuss specific fees and their …
Patent Examination Policy And The Social Costs Of Examiner Allowance And Rejection Errors, Ron D. Katznelson
Patent Examination Policy And The Social Costs Of Examiner Allowance And Rejection Errors, Ron D. Katznelson
Ron D. Katznelson
No abstract provided.