Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
-
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University of Minnesota Law School (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (4)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (3)
- NAALJ (3)
- APA (2)
- Adjudication (2)
-
- Administrative Law Judges (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (2)
- Chevron (2)
- Contents (2)
- Editorial board (2)
- Pepperdine University School of Law (2)
- ALJ (1)
- Administrative Adjudication (1)
- Administrative Conference of the United States (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative constitutionalism (1)
- Administrative courts (1)
- Administrative judges (1)
- Administrative law judge (1)
- Administrative law judges (1)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- Agency Adjudication (1)
- Agency Hearings (1)
- Agency hearing (1)
- Appointments Clause (1)
- Article II (1)
- Auer (1)
- Banking practices (1)
- Central Panel (1)
- Civil Service (1)
- Publication
-
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Bolch Judicial Institute Publications (1)
- Child and Family Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Student Publications (1)
- Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (1)
- Russell L. Weaver (1)
- St. Thomas Law Review (1)
- The Judges' Book (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
The Separation Of Migrant Families At The Border Under The Trump Administration’S Zero-Tolerance Policy: A Critical Analysis Of The Mistreatment Of Immigrant Children Held In U.S. Custody, Dhillon Ramkhelawan
The Separation Of Migrant Families At The Border Under The Trump Administration’S Zero-Tolerance Policy: A Critical Analysis Of The Mistreatment Of Immigrant Children Held In U.S. Custody, Dhillon Ramkhelawan
Child and Family Law Journal
This article provides a critical analysis of the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy that separated migrant families at the Southwest United States border from April to June 2018. It will provide a statistical analysis regarding the number of migrant children that were separated from their parents during this time period, and it will describe the poor living conditions that many of these children were subjected to as they waited for their parent’s immigration cases to be decided. Additionally, this article will also critically analyze the United States’ history of mistreating migrant children who started to flee their war-torn countries in Central …
2020 Fellowship Topic Announcement, National Association Of Administrative Law Judiciary
2020 Fellowship Topic Announcement, National Association Of Administrative Law Judiciary
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Need For A Central Panel Approach To Administrative Adjudication: Pros, Cons, And Selected Practices, Malcolm C. Rich, Alison C. Goldstein
The Need For A Central Panel Approach To Administrative Adjudication: Pros, Cons, And Selected Practices, Malcolm C. Rich, Alison C. Goldstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The goal of this report is to document the growth of the central panel movement that has now emerged in a majority of states. This research is designed to provide data-informed recommendations to states and municipalities considering the adoption of a central panel system or the enlargement of the jurisdiction encompassed by an existing central panel as well as to states considering the adoption of a more final decision-making authority for their central panel ALJs. The work is also intended to inform the debate over whether the central panel approach is something that the federal government should consider. This research …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hierarchically Variable Deference To Agency Interpretations, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Hierarchically Variable Deference To Agency Interpretations, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
When courts review agency action, they typically accord agency decisions a degree of deference. As many courts and commentators have recognized, the law in this area is complicated because it features numerous standards of review, including several distinct regimes for evaluating agencies’ legal interpretations. There is, however, at least one important respect in which uniformity rather than variety prevails: the applicable standards of review do not vary depending on which court is reviewing the agency. Whichever standard governs a particular case—Chevron, Skidmore, or something else—all courts in the judicial hierarchy are supposed to apply that same standard.
This Article proposes …
The Case Against Absolute Judicial Immunity For Immigration Judges
The Case Against Absolute Judicial Immunity For Immigration Judges
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality
A federal regulation states that immigration hearings shall be open to the public. Courts and scholars also have located a right to observe these proceedings in the First Amendment. And yet immigration judges (IJ) have excluded members of the press and other observers from hearings for no stated legal reasons, thus effectively eliminating public scrutiny of proceedings that affect millions of citizens and non-citizens in the United States. In response to a lawsuit pursuing monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief after an IJ ordered guards to remove a reporter from a federal building, an Eleventh Circuit panel held IJs have absolute …
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Table Of Contents And Editorial Board, Yoori Chung
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Slip Slidin' Away: The Erosion Of Apa Adjudication, William Funk
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Although the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) was intended to establish a uniform set of procedures applicable to adjudications "required by statute to be determined on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing," agencies have long sought to avoid those procedures, and, in particular, Administrative Law Judges, by substituting informal, non-APA adjudications. Over time, the courts have accelerated this substitution through a misapplication of three Supreme Court opinions. This article describes the original understanding of the APA and how that original understanding has been eroded over the years. The article then asks whether this is a problem …
Alj Support Systems: Staff Attorneys And Decision Writers, Russell L. Weaver
Alj Support Systems: Staff Attorneys And Decision Writers, Russell L. Weaver
Russell L. Weaver
No abstract provided.
Our Administered Constitution: Administrative Constitutionalism From The Founding To The Present, Sophia Z. Lee
Our Administered Constitution: Administrative Constitutionalism From The Founding To The Present, Sophia Z. Lee
All Faculty Scholarship
This article argues that administrative agencies have been primary interpreters and implementers of the federal Constitution throughout the history of the United States, although the scale and scope of this "administrative constitutionalism" has changed significantly over time as the balance of opportunities and constraints has shifted. Courts have nonetheless cast an increasingly long shadow over the administered Constitution. In part, this is because of the well-known expansion of judicial review in the 20th century. But the shift has as much to do with changes in the legal profession, legal theory, and lawyers’ roles in agency administration. The result is that …
Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Deference, And The Law Of Stare Decisis, Randy J. Kozel
Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Deference, And The Law Of Stare Decisis, Randy J. Kozel
Journal Articles
This Article examines three facets of the relationship between statutory interpretation and the law of stare decisis: judicial interpretation, administrative interpretation, and interpretive methodology. In analyzing these issues, I emphasize the role of stare decisis in pursuing balance between past and present. That role admits of no distinction between statutory and constitutional decisions, calling into question the practice of giving superstrong deference to judicial interpretations of statutes. The pursuit of balance also suggests that one Supreme Court cannot bind future Justices to a wide-ranging interpretive methodology. As for rules requiring deference to administrative interpretations of statutes and regulations, they are …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law: The Trouble With Counting, Jodi L. Short
Administrative Law: The Trouble With Counting, Jodi L. Short
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To Judge Patricia Wald, Jeffrey Lubbers
A Tribute To Judge Patricia Wald, Jeffrey Lubbers
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Winter Of Discontent: A Circumscribed Chevron, Nicholas R. Bednar
The Winter Of Discontent: A Circumscribed Chevron, Nicholas R. Bednar
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating From The Ground Up: Controlling Financial Institutions With Bank Workers’ Unions, Emma Cusumano
Regulating From The Ground Up: Controlling Financial Institutions With Bank Workers’ Unions, Emma Cusumano
University of Richmond Law Review
In the Wells Fargo accounts scandal, millions of banking accounts were created for customers without their consent. The scandal cost Wells Fargo customers millions of dollars in direct and indirect charges. Investigations revealed that employees were pressured into creating these false accounts through abusive banking practices promulgated from the top. These practices are not unique to Wells Fargo; instead, they are ubiquitous in the financial services industry.
Current financial regulations do not adequately address how to mitigate banks’ harmful practices. This comment explores the premise that bank worker unionization could serve as a much-needed check on the power of financial …
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Soft Law, And The Procedural Rule Of Law, Jodi Lazare
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Soft Law, And The Procedural Rule Of Law, Jodi Lazare
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines facilitate discretionary spousal support determinations under the Divorce Act. Non-binding in nature, they are expected to restore some transparency to an uncertain and unpredictable remedy and to benefit dependent spouses who might previously have been deterred from claiming support. They may thus be seen as an important tool for advancing economic justice at family breakdown and promoting substantive economic gender equality. Several Canadian appellate courts have enthusiastically endorsed them. Others object to their application, grounding their resistance in their unofficial and non-binding character. This paper responds to that objection, based on the constitutional separation of …
Are Administrative Law Judges Officers Of The State: Constitutional Considerations In The Selection And Tenure Of Administrative Law, Eric H. Miller
Are Administrative Law Judges Officers Of The State: Constitutional Considerations In The Selection And Tenure Of Administrative Law, Eric H. Miller
St. Thomas Law Review
One of the hallmarks of the Florida Administrative Procedure Act is the creation of a pool of hearing officers independent from any agency or the direct control of any political figure. Since its substantial revision in 1974, the statute has always provided for the selection and hiring of administrative law judges ("ALJ") by the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings. ALJs hear almost every type of case, from licensure denials to environmental permitting challenges. In most cases, the ALJ weighs the evidence and legal arguments before recommending findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed final disposition to the …
Technology Assisted Review (Tar) Guidelines, Bolch Judicial Institute
Technology Assisted Review (Tar) Guidelines, Bolch Judicial Institute
Bolch Judicial Institute Publications
In the winter of 2016, more than 50 e-discovery experts volunteered to develop and draft guidelines providing guidance to the bench and bar on the use of technology assisted review (TAR).
This document explains the TAR process and offers “best practices,” which are intended to provide a protocol on whether and under what conditions TAR should be used. It provides a strong record and roadmap for the bench and bar, which explain and support the use of TAR in appropriate cases.
As with any group product of this nature, where some consensus must be reached, the drafters and other participants …
You’Re Fired! Why The Alj Multi-Track Dual Removal Provisions Violate The Constitution & How To Fix Them, Linda D. Jellum
You’Re Fired! Why The Alj Multi-Track Dual Removal Provisions Violate The Constitution & How To Fix Them, Linda D. Jellum
Articles
This Article explains why the for-cause removal provisions for ALJs are unconstitutional and offers three potential solutions to remedy this problem. Part I provides background information, which explains that the APA was a compromise of competing interests. Some wanted ALJs to be completely in-dependent from their agencies to further unbiased decision-making and inde-pendence, and others feared agencies would lose control over setting policy, should ALJs have such an independent function.Ultimately, Congress com-promised by including provisions to make the ALJs more independent, while also ensuring that agencies retained complete control to set policy.
As part of the independence piece of the …
Regulating From The Ground Up: Controlling Financial Institutions With Bank Workers’ Unions, Emma Cusumano
Regulating From The Ground Up: Controlling Financial Institutions With Bank Workers’ Unions, Emma Cusumano
Law Student Publications
In the Wells Fargo accounts scandal, millions of banking accounts were created for customers without their consent. The scandal cost Wells Fargo customers millions of dollars in direct and indirect charges. Investigations revealed that employees were pressured into creating these false accounts through abusive banking practices promulgated from the top. These practices are not unique to Wells Fargo; instead, they are ubiquitous in the financial services industry.
Current financial regulations do not adequately address how to mitigate banks’ harmful practices. This comment explores the premise that bank worker unionization could serve as a much-needed check on the power of financial …
Research Report On Federal Agency Alj Hiring After Lucia And Executive Order 13843, Jack M. Beermann
Research Report On Federal Agency Alj Hiring After Lucia And Executive Order 13843, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
This draft report examines federal agency hiring practices for administrative law judges ("ALJs"), who preside over formal agency hearings, in light of the Supreme Court's determination that ALJs are constitutional officers and President Trump's executive order to exempt ALJs from certain statutory competitive-service hiring requirements. The report also provides recommendations for best agency hiring practices. Professors Jack Beermann and Jennifer Mascott co-authored this initial draft report. After Professor Mascott stepped down from the Administrative Conference of the United States to work in the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, Professor Beermann edited the report and produced its final May …