Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Articles (4)
- First Amendment (3)
- Regulations (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- FCC (2)
- Federal Communications Commission (2)
- Pleadings (2)
- 17th amendment (1)
- 1964 (1)
- 2001 Policy Statement (1)
- 601 (1)
- 602 (1)
- 9/11 (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Administrative law; judicial review; regulatory government; administrative law (1)
- Alexander (1)
- Authorizing legislation (1)
- Banking and Finance (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Broadcast Television (1)
- Broadcasters (1)
- Bumpers Amendment (1)
- Checkpoint (1)
- Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. (1)
- Citadel Broadcasting Co. (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Confiscatory Rate Doctrine (1)
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (3)
- Jeffrey C. Tuomala (3)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
-
- Edward Ivan Cueva (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Tabatha Abu El-Haj (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Valuation Averaging: A New Procedure For Resolving Valuation Disputes, Keith Sharfman
Valuation Averaging: A New Procedure For Resolving Valuation Disputes, Keith Sharfman
Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers
In this Article, Professor Sharfman addresses the problem of "discretionary valuation": that courts resolve valuation disputes arbitrarily and unpredictably, thus harming litigants and society. As a solution, he proposes the enactment of "valuation averaging," a new procedure for resolving valuation disputes modeled on the algorithmic valuation processes often agreed to by sophisticated private firms in advance of any dispute. He argues that by replacing the discretion of judges and juries with a mechanical valuation process, valuation averaging would cause litigants to introduce more plausible and conciliatory valuations into evidence and thereby reduce the cost of valuation litigation and increase the …
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Say Cheese: The Constitutionality Of State-Mandated Airtime On Public Broadcasting Stations In Wisconsin, Andrew D. Cotlar
Federal Communications Law Journal
Last year, the State of Wisconsin passed legislation which would require statechartered public broadcasting television networks to carry political advertising for candidates free of charge. In this article, Andrew Cotlar raises many concerns about the wisdom of such legislation and the impact this trend may have on public broadcasters throughout the nation. The author begins by analyzing the current position of the law on political access requirements, at both federal and state levels, and then argues that the public television stations should continue to be free to exercise substantial editorial discretion. The Article proceeds to critique the Wisconsin statute as …
Telric Vs. Universal Service: A Takings Violation?, Stuart Buck
Telric Vs. Universal Service: A Takings Violation?, Stuart Buck
Federal Communications Law Journal
While the Telecommunications Act of 1996 has had a profound positive impact on many sectors of the communications industry in the United States, local phone companies have recently faced a serious dilemma under a provision of the Act known as TELRIC. In this article, Stuart Buck presents a current analysis of the position of the telephone company and its struggle to meet costs under the TELRIC structure. The author argues that by forcing regional phone operators to grant wholesale pricing to competitors under TELRIC, while simultaneously maintaining Universal Service requirements of reduced-rate phone access to remote customers, the local phone …
National Identity Cards: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Issues, Daniel J. Steinbock
National Identity Cards: Fourth And Fifth Amendment Issues, Daniel J. Steinbock
ExpressO
In the past two years there have been serious calls for a national identity system whose centerpiece would be some form of national identity card. Such a system is seen mainly as a tool against terrorists, but also as a useful response to illegal immigration, identity theft, and electoral fraud. Both proponents and opponents have noted the potential constitutional problems of such an identity system, but as yet there has been no published legal analysis of these questions. This article aims to fill that gap by analyzing the Fourth and Fifth Amendment issues in two major features of any likely …
In Defense Of Chief Justice Roy S. Moore, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
In Defense Of Chief Justice Roy S. Moore, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of Chief Justice Roy S. Moore, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
In Defense Of Chief Justice Roy S. Moore, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Jeffrey C. Tuomala
No abstract provided.
Legislating Chevron, Elizabeth Garrett
Legislating Chevron, Elizabeth Garrett
Michigan Law Review
One of the most significant administrative law cases, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, lnc., is routinely referred to as the "counter-Marbury." The reference suggests that Chevron's command to courts to defer to certain reasonable agency interpretations of statutes is superficially an uneasy fit with the declaration in Marbury v. Madison that "[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." According to the consensus view, Chevron deference is consistent with Marbury, as long as Congress has delegated to agencies the power to make policy by interpreting ambiguous statutory language or filling …
Federal Maritime Commission V. South Carolina State Ports Authority: Small Iceberg Or Just The Tip?, Gordon G. Young
Federal Maritime Commission V. South Carolina State Ports Authority: Small Iceberg Or Just The Tip?, Gordon G. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Memorandum Of Argument, Supreme Court Of Canada, In Re James R. Demers, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Memorandum Of Argument, Supreme Court Of Canada, In Re James R. Demers, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Memorandum Of Argument, Supreme Court Of Canada, In Re James R. Demers, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Memorandum Of Argument, Supreme Court Of Canada, In Re James R. Demers, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Jeffrey C. Tuomala
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Federal Communications Commission On The Path From The Vast Wasteland To The Fertile Plain, Kathleen Q. Abernathy
The Role Of The Federal Communications Commission On The Path From The Vast Wasteland To The Fertile Plain, Kathleen Q. Abernathy
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Canon That Tax Penalties Should Be Strictly Construed, Steve R. Johnson
The Canon That Tax Penalties Should Be Strictly Construed, Steve R. Johnson
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Avoiding Slim Reasoning And Shady Results: A Proposal For Indecency And Obscenity Regulation In Radio And Broadcast Television, Jacob T. Rigney
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Note explores the relevant law regarding the issue of indecency and obscenity in broadcast, with particular focus on a 2001 Policy Statement released by the FCC. The Author examines the major problems with the regulatory scheme as it now exists, and offers an alternative. The Author concludes by arguing that leaving the subjective decisions regarding indecency to market forces, leaving parents to determine what should or should not be indecent, and leaving the FCC free to pursue obscenity with greater zeal is the most appropriate course of action for the future.
Drug Regulations And The Constitution After Western States, Margaret Gilhooley
Drug Regulations And The Constitution After Western States, Margaret Gilhooley
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thinking Like A Lawyer, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Thinking Like A Lawyer, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Thinking Like A Lawyer, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Manual De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Manual De Derecho Procesal Civil, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
The Freedom Of Information Act Post-9/11: Balancing The Public's Right To Know, Critical Infrastructure Protection, And Homeland Security, Kristen Elizabeth Uhl
The Freedom Of Information Act Post-9/11: Balancing The Public's Right To Know, Critical Infrastructure Protection, And Homeland Security, Kristen Elizabeth Uhl
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Title Vi's Disparate Impact Regulations Valid?, Bradford Mank
Are Title Vi's Disparate Impact Regulations Valid?, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Essay, however, contends that section 602 disparate impact regulations in Tide VI are valid because Congress has implicitly sanctioned their creation, and explicitly approved them in subsequent related statutes.
Part II of this Essay discusses the legislative history of Tide VI, which suggests that Congress intended to give administrative agencies discretion to define "discrimination" in their Tide VI regulations as prohibiting either intentional conduct or actions having disparate impacts against racial minorities as long as the President approved such rules.
Part III illustrates that five different Congresses have enacted four subsequent related statutes that explicitly incorporate Tide VI disparate …
Beyond Accountability, Lisa Schultz Bressman
Beyond Accountability, Lisa Schultz Bressman
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article argues that efforts to square the administrative state with the constitutional structure have become too fixated on the concern for political accountability. As a result, those efforts have overlooked an important obstacle to agency legitimacy: the concern for administrative arbitrariness. Such thinking is evident in the prevailing model of the administrative state, which seeks to legitimate agencies by placing their policy decisions firmly under the control of the one elected official responsive to the entire nation-the President. This Article contends that the "presidential control" model cannot legitimate agencies because the model rests on a mistaken assumption about the …
Book Review: The Calligraphic State: Conceptualizing The Study Of Society Through Law, Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Book Review: The Calligraphic State: Conceptualizing The Study Of Society Through Law, Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Tabatha Abu El-Haj
No abstract provided.
State Laws And The Independent Judiciary: An Analysis Of The Effects Of The Seventeenth Amendment On The Number Of Supreme Court Cases Holding State Laws Unconstitutional, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
In recent years, the Seventeenth Amendment has been the subject of legal scholarship, congressional hearings and debate, Supreme Court opinions, popular press articles and commentary, state legislative efforts aimed at repeal, and activist repeal movements. To date, the literature on the effects of the Seventeenth Amendment has focused almost exclusively on the effects on the political production of legislation and competition between legislative bodies. Very little attention has been given to the potential adverse effects of the Seventeenth Amendment on the relationship between state legislatures and the federal courts. This Article seeks to fill part of that literature gap, applying …