Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Africa; World Trade Organization; plastic bag regulation; plastic bags; Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement; TBT Agreement; environmental protection; sustainable development; General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade; GATT; multilateral trade; environmental regulation; developing countries; Trade and Environment (1)
- Americans With Disabilities Act; ADA; Title III; website accessibility; place of public accommodation; public accommodation; circuit split; predatory litigation; WCAG (1)
- Chevron; Chevron (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Clean Power Plan; Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction; Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants; Target Reduction Rates; Administrative Deference; International Climate Change Efforts; Economic Ramifications; Utility Rates; Electric Grid Reliability; Chevron Deference; UARG v. EPA; Michigan v. EPA; Interim Target Goals; Flexible Regulations; Compliance Formula; Endangerment Finding; Section 111(D) of the Clean Air Act; Legislative Intent; "Appropriate and Necessary" Standard; Costs of Implementation; "Tailpipe Rule"; Health Benefits (1)
- Immigration; Immigration Detention; Transfer; Custody; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Agency; Noncitizen; Deportation; Freedom of Information Act; Archipelago; Asylum; Notice to Appear; Executive Office for Immigration Review; Board of Immigration Appeals; Department of Homeland Security; Immigration and Naturalization Service; Immigration and Nationality Act; Intergovernmental Service Agreement; Bond; Parole; Representation; Community; Rumsfeld v. Padilla; Legal Cynicism; Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; Jurisdiction; Hunger Strike; Performance-Based National Detention Standards (1)
-
- Immigration; Procedural Due Process; Immigration Bail; Involuntary Confinement (1)
- Immigration; due process; detention; bond hearings; immigrants; criminal immigrants; criminal aliens; liberty; constitutional law; immigration law; statutory interpretation; statutory amendment; 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c); Jennings v. Rodriguez; Immigration court; detain; detention; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; ICE (1)
- Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council (1)
- Inc.; Loper Bright; Loper Bright Enterprise v. Raimondo; admin; administrative law; Administrative State; deference; judicial deference; agency; agency expertise; Marbury v. Madison; Magnuson-Stevens Act; Brand X; Nat’l Cable and Telecomm. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Serv.; Burden Shifting; West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Jurisdiction; subject matter jurisdiction; immigration; Article III; jurisdiction-stripping; IIRIRA; 1252(g); due process; separation of powers; Silva; Arce; Reno; Federal Tort Claims Act; FTCA; American-Arab Anti Discrimination-Committee; judicial review; wrongful removal; Mathews (1)
- Notice-and-comment; Administrative Procedure Act; rule-making; § 553; § 553 exemptions; federal agencies (1)
- Patent Law; Legislation; Administrative Law; Regulatory Law; Artificial Intelligence; Inventions; Inventors; Legal Personhood; DABUS; Robots; Innovation; Technology; Law; Society; Intellectual Property (1)
- Privacy law; Cybersecurity; Hackers; FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.; Data breaches; Data security procedures; Self-regulatory organizations (SROs); Financial Trade Commission (FTC); Corporate privacy; Cyber Crime; Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act; Deceptive or unfair business practice; Congressional inaction; Key principles of compliance; Best Practices Guidelines; Cyber risk insurance; Commercial general liability (CGL) insurance; First party cyber loss; Third party cyber liability; Technical policies and procedures; Written information security plan (WISP) (1)
- Securities regulation; Investment advisers; Third party examiners; Third party examination models; Self-regulatory Organizations (SROs); Arbitrary and Capricious Standard; Administrative Procedure Act (APA); Administrative Rulemaking; Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; “Reasonably designed to prevent fraud” test; Unauthorized tax; Congress’s Power of the Purse; Securities regulation; Compliance policies and procedures; Adviser examinations; Nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs); Proxy advisory firms; Certified Financial Analyst (CFA) Institute/CFA; Public company auditors; Chief Compliance Officers (CCOs); Compliance audits and reviews; Internal controls; Cost-benefit analysis; Financial regulation (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States; SCOTUS; major questions doctrine; MQD; administrative law; crypto; cryptocurrency; blockchain; crypto asset; SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.; Howey test; securities; West Virginia v. EPA; Roberts Court; judicial enforcement actions (1)
- Technology; Internet; European Union; EU Digital Services Act; Democracy; Deliberative Democracy; Public sphere; Marketplace of Ideas; Freedom of Speech; Bubble effect; Filter bubble; Echo Chamber; Age of Communication; Polarization; Recommender systems; Personalized Experiences; Social networks; Search engines; Principle of Proportionality; Media Literacy; Profiling (1)
- U.S.A. (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Agency Deference After Loper: Expertise As A Casualty Of A War Against The “Administrative State”, Michael M. Epstein
Agency Deference After Loper: Expertise As A Casualty Of A War Against The “Administrative State”, Michael M. Epstein
Brooklyn Law Review
Chevron deference has been a foundational principle for administrative law for decades. Chevron provided a two-step analysis for determining whether an agency would be given deference in its decision-making. This deferential test finds its legitimacy on the grounds of agency expertise and accountability. However, when the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprise v. Raimondo, it positioned itself to potentially overrule or severely limit Chevron. An overruling of Chevron would place judicial deference to administrative agency decisions in peril by allowing courts to substitute their own views over the informed opinions of agency experts. This …
The Major Questions Doctrine’S Domain, Todd Phillips, Beau J. Baumann
The Major Questions Doctrine’S Domain, Todd Phillips, Beau J. Baumann
Brooklyn Law Review
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court elevated the major questions doctrine to new heights by reframing it as a substantive canon and clear statement rule rooted in the separation of powers. The academic response has missed two unanswered questions that will determine the extent of the doctrine’s domain. First, how will the Court apply the doctrine to a range of different regulatory schemes? The doctrine has so far only been applied to nationwide legislative rules that are both (1) economically or politically significant and (2) transformative. It is unclear whether the doctrine applies to alternative modes of regulation …
How (Not) To Deal With The Bubble Effect In Cyberspace: The Case Of The Eu And Digital Services Act, João Tornada
How (Not) To Deal With The Bubble Effect In Cyberspace: The Case Of The Eu And Digital Services Act, João Tornada
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Deliberative democracies are based on an ideal process of speech and dialogue that fosters an “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” public discourse sphere. In cyberspace, social networks and search engine platforms largely operate with recommender systems that tailor content according to the users' interests and online behavior (“profiling”), thus segregating them from different points of view (“bubble effect”). While this personalization of content is particularly efficient to promote commercial goods and services, when it comes to information of common interest, especially on political matters, it undermines consensus-building dialogue and threatens democratic ideals. The theory of a free “marketplace of ideas” justifies …
A Civil Shame: The Failure To Protect Due Process In Discretionary Immigration Bond Hearings, Stacy L. Brustin
A Civil Shame: The Failure To Protect Due Process In Discretionary Immigration Bond Hearings, Stacy L. Brustin
Brooklyn Law Review
Over the last four years, the US Supreme Court has granted certiorari in four immigration bond review cases. The sheer number of cases the Court has recently considered underscores the significance of this area of immigration law. Each case centers on whether the Immigration and Nationality Act or the Constitution mandates a bond review hearing after prolonged detention. Yet these cases leave unresolved the issue of whether initial bond hearings themselves meet the due process threshold required of civil confinement proceedings. Federal circuit and district courts have addressed aspects of this question and found procedural due process violations. However, most …
Ice Transfers And The Detention Archipelago, Sabrina Balgamwalla
Ice Transfers And The Detention Archipelago, Sabrina Balgamwalla
Journal of Law and Policy
This article examines transfers as an understudied but critical dimension of the immigration detention system. Transfers regularly take detainees in immigration custody from public to private facilities, across state lines, and beyond the jurisdiction of individual courts. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) has virtually unlimited authority to use transfers strategically to further agency goals of immigration enforcement. For individual detainees, transfers shape outcomes in their immigration cases. Noncitizens are regularly funneled into detention centers in legal jurisdictions generally hostile to claims for relief. Transfers also regularly send detainees to facilities in isolated, rural communities, where they are more likely to …
A Call To Replace The Apa’S Notice-And-Comment Exemption For Guidance Documents, Crystal M. Cummings
A Call To Replace The Apa’S Notice-And-Comment Exemption For Guidance Documents, Crystal M. Cummings
Brooklyn Law Review
Section 553 of the APA requires public “notice-and-comment” before a federal agency issues substantive rules and exempts from these procedures guidance documents that merely offer nonbinding insight and assistance on existing law. The problem of federal agencies using the notice-and-comment exemption to issue legislative rules that are legally binding has garnered considerable attention. Congressional efforts to amend the APA in response have failed and, in turn, variations have been offered on a seemingly simple fix—mandate or encourage agencies to solicit public input before issuing guidance documents. This note characterizes these proposals as overlays on the § 553(b)(A) exemption. The note …
How Artificial Intelligence Machines Can Legally Become Inventors: An Examination Of And Solution To The Decision On Dabus, Justyn Millamena
How Artificial Intelligence Machines Can Legally Become Inventors: An Examination Of And Solution To The Decision On Dabus, Justyn Millamena
Journal of Law and Policy
With proliferation of Artificial Intelligence research and development, it is foreseeable that these machines will invent many new patentable technologies. However, the United States Patent and Trademark Office recently deemed a patent application incomplete for listing an AI machine as the inventor. If the USPTO’s decision is not corrected, the patent system will be in danger because many fraudulent patent applications that list incorrect inventors will be filed. This would drastically change existing and settled inventorship jurisprudence and might endanger the patent protection over such patents. This Note argues that the USPTO’s reasons for not allowing the Artificial Intelligence machine …
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Brooklyn Law Review
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) abrogates sovereign immunity in certain circumstances to allow private individuals, regardless of citizenship, to sue the United States for specific torts committed by government officials. Yet when two lawful permanent residents—located in different parts of the country—separately tried to sue the government for wrongful removal, one court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction while the other court did not. These decisions, though reaching opposite conclusions, both relied on federal immigration statute 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) in order to determine whether judicial review of immigrants’ removal orders is precluded. This note argues …
The Rise Of Ada Title Iii: How Congress And The Department Of Justice Can Solve Predatory Litigation, Sarah E. Zehentner
The Rise Of Ada Title Iii: How Congress And The Department Of Justice Can Solve Predatory Litigation, Sarah E. Zehentner
Brooklyn Law Review
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted in 1990 to afford equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities. Title III of the ADA, specifically, was enacted to afford disabled individuals equal access to places of public accommodation. When the ADA was enacted, the internet was still in its infancy and Congress did not contemplate the need for governing accessibility to websites of public accommodations. Today, the internet has become embedded in virtually every aspect of our lives, yet there are still millions of disabled individuals who are unable to equally access the websites of American businesses. With the ADA being …
Of Sustainable Development In Africa: Addressing The (In)Congruence Of Plastic Bag Regulations With International Trade Rules, Regis Y, Simo
Of Sustainable Development In Africa: Addressing The (In)Congruence Of Plastic Bag Regulations With International Trade Rules, Regis Y, Simo
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Several aspects of the trade policies of African countries suffer from neglect in the legal literature. When they are the object of research, the focus is sometimes limited to their participation in the dispute settlement system or on the enforceability of special and differential treatment provisions. While practice displays that African countries have almost never been the target of complaints for a number a reasons, those approaches do not always take into consideration African countries’ domestic measures affecting the flow of goods and services, which could eventually trigger disputes. This paper intends to fill that gap and add to the …
Demanding Due Process: Time To Amend 8 U.S.C. § 1226(C) And Limit Indefinite Detention Of Criminal Immigrants, Allison M. Cunneen
Demanding Due Process: Time To Amend 8 U.S.C. § 1226(C) And Limit Indefinite Detention Of Criminal Immigrants, Allison M. Cunneen
Brooklyn Law Review
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), Congress mandates that the Attorney General detain criminal immigrants upon release from prison. The statute neither provides a temporal limitation to detention nor does it afford a criminal immigrant periodic bond hearings to determine whether he or she is a flight risk or danger to the community. Thus, until an immigration judge decides whether a criminal immigrant should be removed from the United States, that person remains detained. With the unprecedent backlog in immigration courts, criminal immigrants are waiting longer for a removal hearing, which means longer time spent in detention with no opportunity for …
No Cake For You: Discrimination, Dignity, And Refusals To Serve, William Araiza
No Cake For You: Discrimination, Dignity, And Refusals To Serve, William Araiza
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Legal Climate On Climate Change: The Fate Of The Epa's Clean Power Plan After Michigan And Uarg, Israel Katz
The Legal Climate On Climate Change: The Fate Of The Epa's Clean Power Plan After Michigan And Uarg, Israel Katz
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
One of the centerpieces of the United States’ effort to combat climate change is the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) controversial Clean Power Plan, which consists of the first-ever federal regulations requiring states to achieve massive carbon dioxide emissions reductions from existing fossil fuel-fired power plants. The regulations operate by setting interim and final emissions target dates for states to ultimately reach an aggregate 32% reduction in carbon emissions by the year 2030. This Note argues that the current regulations will not survive judicial scrutiny, because the U.S. Supreme Court has moved away from traditional administrative deference in instances where an …
Mandatory Third Party Compliance Examinations For Investment Advisers: An Sec Waterloo?, Mercer Bullard
Mandatory Third Party Compliance Examinations For Investment Advisers: An Sec Waterloo?, Mercer Bullard
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) appears to be on the verge of requiring investment advisers to undergo third party examinations. One justification for the rulemaking is that the Commission lacks sufficient resources to examine advisers frequently enough. Another is to create indirectly a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for investments advisers. Both may leave a rulemaking particularly vulnerable to challenge as arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedures Act. This Article considers three novel grounds on which a rulemaking may be successfully challenged. Congress has repeatedly rejected SEC requests to provide additional funding for examinations or to create an …
Like A Bad Neighbor, Hackers Are There: The Need For Data Security Legislation And Cyber Insurance In Light Of Increasing Ftc Enforcement Actions, Jennifer Gordon
Like A Bad Neighbor, Hackers Are There: The Need For Data Security Legislation And Cyber Insurance In Light Of Increasing Ftc Enforcement Actions, Jennifer Gordon
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Privacy has come to the forefront of the technology world as third party hackers are constantly attacking companies for their customers’ data. With increasing instances of compromised customer information, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been bringing suit against companies for inadequate data security procedures. The FTC’s newfound authority to bring suit regarding cybersecurity breaches, based on the Third Circuit’s decision in FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., is a result of inaction—Congress has been unable to pass sufficient cybersecurity legislation, causing the FTC to step in and fill the void in regulation. In the absence of congressional action, this self-proclaimed …
Policing School Discipline, Catherine Y. Kim
Policing School Discipline, Catherine Y. Kim
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Apoplectic About Hyperlexis, William Araiza
The Trouble With Robertson: Equal Protection, The Separation Of Powers And The Line Between Statutory Amendment And Statutory Interpretation, William D. Araiza
The Trouble With Robertson: Equal Protection, The Separation Of Powers And The Line Between Statutory Amendment And Statutory Interpretation, William D. Araiza
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.