Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
-
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (3)
- Sooner Lawyer Archive (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
-
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Historical and Topical Legal Documents (1)
- Meg Penrose (1)
- Powell Correspondence (1)
- Student Newspapers (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- Wilson R. Huhn (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 28 of 28
Full-Text Articles in Law
Taking Corrigibility Seriously, Dora Klein
Taking Corrigibility Seriously, Dora Klein
Faculty Articles
This article argues that the Supreme Court's creation of a category of "irreparably corrupt" juveniles is not only an epistemological mistake but also a tactical mistake which has undermined the Court's express desire that only in the "rarest" of cases will juveniles be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Sandra Day O’Connor’S "First" Principles: A Constructive Vision For An Angry Nation, Lisa Kern Griffin
Sandra Day O’Connor’S "First" Principles: A Constructive Vision For An Angry Nation, Lisa Kern Griffin
Faculty Scholarship
During her 25-year tenure on the Supreme Court, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor cast the decisive votes to resolve the most emotional debates, yet she maintained collegiality among the Justices and retained the public’s high regard. A recent biography by historian and journalist Evan Thomas chronicles her extraordinary personal qualities, remarkable professional journey, and constructive brand of patriotism. This book review essay describes a legacy in three parts: a lived example of how to thrive in the face of challenges, a jurisprudence driven by the courage to make compromises, and a theory about the long game of American democracy. First reintroduces …
Correspondence With Fellow Associate Justices Of The Supreme Court Of The United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Correspondence With Fellow Associate Justices Of The Supreme Court Of The United States, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Powell Correspondence
No abstract provided.
The Picture, Nancy Bellhouse May
The Picture, Nancy Bellhouse May
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Way Pavers: Eleven Supreme Court-Worthy Women, Meg Penrose
The Way Pavers: Eleven Supreme Court-Worthy Women, Meg Penrose
Meg Penrose
Four women have served as Associate Justices on the United States Supreme Court. Since the Court’s inception in 1789, 162 individuals have been nominated to serve as Supreme Court Justices. Five nominees, or roughly 3 percent, have been women. To help put this gender dearth in perspective, more men named “Samuel” have served as Supreme Court Justices than women. Thirteen U.S. Presidents have nominated more people to the Supreme Court than the total number of women that have served on the Court. Finally, there are currently more Catholics serving on the Supreme Court than the number of women appointed in …
The Way Pavers: Eleven Supreme Court-Worthy Women, Meg Penrose
The Way Pavers: Eleven Supreme Court-Worthy Women, Meg Penrose
Faculty Scholarship
Four women have served as Associate Justices on the United States Supreme Court. Since the Court’s inception in 1789, 162 individuals have been nominated to serve as Supreme Court Justices. Five nominees, or roughly 3 percent, have been women. To help put this gender dearth in perspective, more men named “Samuel” have served as Supreme Court Justices than women. Thirteen U.S. Presidents have nominated more people to the Supreme Court than the total number of women that have served on the Court. Finally, there are currently more Catholics serving on the Supreme Court than the number of women appointed in …
From The Dean, Joseph Harroz Jr.
Sandra Day O'Connor Spends The Day At Ou, Jonella Frank
Sandra Day O'Connor Spends The Day At Ou, Jonella Frank
Sooner Lawyer Archive
No abstract provided.
Justice O'Connor And The First Amendment 1981-84, Edward V. Heck, Paula C. Arledge
Justice O'Connor And The First Amendment 1981-84, Edward V. Heck, Paula C. Arledge
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Alito/O'Connor Switch, Joan Biskupic
Under-The-Table Overruling, Christopher J. Peters
Under-The-Table Overruling, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
In this contribution to a Wayne Law Review symposium on the first three years of the Roberts Court, the author normatively assesses the Court's practice of "under-the-table overruling," or "underruling," in high-profile constitutional cases involving abortion, campaign-finance reform, and affirmative action. The Court "underrules" when it renders a decision that undercuts a recent precedent without admitting that it is doing so. The author contends that underruling either is not supported by, or is directly incompatible with, three common rationales for constitutional stare decisis: the noninstrumental rationale, the predictability rationale, and the legitimacy rationale. In particular, while the latter rationale - …
Introduction To Sandra Day O'Connor, George A. Bermann
Introduction To Sandra Day O'Connor, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
There are many, many reasons to honor Justice Sandra Day O'Connor-and during the course of her brief but rich stay with us here at Columbia Law School, we have touched on only some of those many reasons. There remains this afternoon one more occasion to honor Justice O'Connor-an honor that has a very special resonance at this law school. It is the conferral of the Wolfgang Friedmann Memorial Award by the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, a recognition of contributions to international law that is deeply meaningful not only at Columbia Law School, but in international law circles generally.
Justice O'Connor And 'The Threat To Judicial Independence': The Cowgirl Who Cried Wolf?, Arthur D. Hellman
Justice O'Connor And 'The Threat To Judicial Independence': The Cowgirl Who Cried Wolf?, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
Sandra Day O'Connor retired from active service on the United States Supreme Court in early 2006. As her principal "retirement project," she has taken on the task of defending the independence of the judiciary. In speeches, op-ed articles, and public interviews, she has warned that "we must be ever vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary into adopting their preferred policies." Justice O'Connor has done the nation a service by bringing the subject of judicial independence to center stage and by calling attention to the important values it serves. Unfortunately, however, in describing the threats to that independence, she …
Justice O'Connor And The "Right To Die": Constitutional Promises Unfulfilled, Michael P. Allen
Justice O'Connor And The "Right To Die": Constitutional Promises Unfulfilled, Michael P. Allen
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Jurisprudence Of Sandra Day O'Connor: A Refusal To "Foreclose The Unanticipated", Wilson R. Huhn
Constitutional Jurisprudence Of Sandra Day O'Connor: A Refusal To "Foreclose The Unanticipated", Wilson R. Huhn
Akron Law Faculty Publications
Earlier this year, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court of the United States after 25 years of service. It would be difficult to overstate the impact that Justice O’Connor has had on the interpretation of the Constitution during her tenure on the Court. Her importance to the development of American constitutional law stems from her central position on the Supreme Court. Professor Erwin Chemerinsky has described her role in these terms:
O’Connor is in control. In virtually every area of constitutional law, her key fifth vote determines what will be the majority’s position and what will be …
Constitutional Jurisprudence Of Sandra Day O'Connor: A Refusal To "Foreclose The Unanticipated", Wilson R. Huhn
Constitutional Jurisprudence Of Sandra Day O'Connor: A Refusal To "Foreclose The Unanticipated", Wilson R. Huhn
Wilson R. Huhn
Earlier this year, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court of the United States after 25 years of service. It would be difficult to overstate the impact that Justice O’Connor has had on the interpretation of the Constitution during her tenure on the Court. Her importance to the development of American constitutional law stems from her central position on the Supreme Court. Professor Erwin Chemerinsky has described her role in these terms:
O’Connor is in control. In virtually every area of constitutional law, her key fifth vote determines what will be the majority’s position and what will be …
In Praise Of Contextuality - Justice O'Connor And The Establishment Clause, Marie Failinger
In Praise Of Contextuality - Justice O'Connor And The Establishment Clause, Marie Failinger
Faculty Scholarship
Among Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s lasting contributions to Supreme Court Jurisprudence has been her attempt to contextualize Religion Clause jurisprudence, to move the Court in the direction of considering the circumstances surrounding government in assessing its constitutionality. Typical of this contributor has been her two decades of work in Establishment Clause law, in particular, ended by Lynch v. Donnelly, in which she introduced the “non-endorsement” test and one of the Ten Commandment cases, McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties Union, in which it was most recently employed. The non-endorsement test has served as one of the two commonly competing …
The Sway Of The Swing Vote: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor And Her Influence On Issues Of Race, Religion, Gender And Class: Foreword, Paula A. Monopoli
The Sway Of The Swing Vote: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor And Her Influence On Issues Of Race, Religion, Gender And Class: Foreword, Paula A. Monopoli
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Paula A. Monopoli
Foreword, Paula A. Monopoli
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: The World's Most Powerful Jurist?, Diane Lowenthal, Barbara Palmer
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: The World's Most Powerful Jurist?, Diane Lowenthal, Barbara Palmer
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Sandra Day O'Connor's Position On Discrimination, Stephen E. Gottlieb
Sandra Day O'Connor's Position On Discrimination, Stephen E. Gottlieb
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Way Paving Jewish Justices And Jewish Women, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Reflections On Way Paving Jewish Justices And Jewish Women, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York Law School Reporter, V. 10, No. 1, October 1992, New York Law School
New York Law School Reporter, V. 10, No. 1, October 1992, New York Law School
Student Newspapers
No abstract provided.
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Sandra Day O’Connor, Abortion, And Compromise For The Court, Susan M. Halatyn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: Trends Toward Judicial Restraint
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: Trends Toward Judicial Restraint
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Memorandum Regarding Selection Of Sandra Day O'Connor As Supreme Court Nominee, William French Smith
Memorandum Regarding Selection Of Sandra Day O'Connor As Supreme Court Nominee, William French Smith
Historical and Topical Legal Documents
No abstract provided.