Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- First Amendment (1635)
- Constitutional Law (1194)
- Religion Law (239)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (230)
- Law and Society (196)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (191)
- Intellectual Property Law (184)
- Internet Law (172)
- Communications Law (143)
- Education Law (134)
- Jurisprudence (126)
- Law and Politics (117)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (116)
- Courts (108)
- State and Local Government Law (100)
- Legislation (96)
- Criminal Law (95)
- Legal History (86)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (85)
- Fourteenth Amendment (82)
- Privacy Law (79)
- Judges (71)
- Administrative Law (69)
- Labor and Employment Law (68)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (64)
- Law and Gender (62)
- Health Law and Policy (60)
- Election Law (57)
- Litigation (56)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (346)
- Selected Works (305)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (167)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (107)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (95)
- Pepperdine University (93)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (67)
- American University Washington College of Law (66)
- University of Georgia School of Law (66)
- The University of Akron (56)
- Seattle University School of Law (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- University of South Carolina (47)
- Cleveland State University (45)
- Columbia Law School (45)
- St. Mary's University (43)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (43)
- New York Law School (39)
- Boston University School of Law (38)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (37)
- Notre Dame Law School (35)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (34)
- University of Baltimore Law (34)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (33)
- George Washington University Law School (29)
- University of Miami Law School (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (28)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (27)
- University of Richmond (24)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (113)
- Touro Law Review (91)
- Publications (86)
- Scholarly Works (77)
- Indiana Law Journal (75)
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (75)
- Faculty Publications (57)
- All Faculty Scholarship (52)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (52)
- Journal Articles (49)
- Seattle University Law Review (49)
- Fordham Law Review (47)
- Akron Law Review (46)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (44)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (43)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (40)
- South Carolina Law Review (38)
- Supreme Court Case Files (34)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (34)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (32)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (29)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (29)
- Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (28)
- American University Law Review (26)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (26)
- Articles (25)
- Cleveland State Law Review (24)
- Jack C Dolance II (23)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (23)
- Publication Type
Articles 2881 - 2898 of 2898
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Barenblatt Decision Of The Supreme Court And The Academic Profession, Ralph F. Fuchs
The Barenblatt Decision Of The Supreme Court And The Academic Profession, Ralph F. Fuchs
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Considerations In Determining Limitations On State Power To Regulate Motion Picture Content
Considerations In Determining Limitations On State Power To Regulate Motion Picture Content
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Lectures On Communications Media Legal And Policy Problems, University Of Michigan Law School
Lectures On Communications Media Legal And Policy Problems, University Of Michigan Law School
Summer Institute on International and Comparative Law
Published under the auspices of the University of Michigan Law School (which, however, assumes no responsibility for the views expressed) with the aid of funds derived from gifts to the University of Michigan by William W. Cook
The Clear And Present Danger Test--A Reply To Mr. Meiklejohn, Wallace Mendelson
The Clear And Present Danger Test--A Reply To Mr. Meiklejohn, Wallace Mendelson
Vanderbilt Law Review
As educator and philosopher Alexander Meiklejohn has won a lion's share of the honors of his profession. Few have seen so clearly, or done more to enrich, the meaning of America. When in a provoking little volume' that appeared in 1948, Mr. Meiklejohn examined the meaning of democracy and free speech and found that Mr. Justice Holmes' clear and present danger test was incompatible with both, he obviously struck fire. His theme was that when men govern themselves it is they and not government who must judge as to the wisdom, fairness and danger of ideas. This means that unwise, …
Book Reviews, Edmund M. Morgan (Reviewer), Albert Williams (Reviewer), J. Warren Madden (Reviewer), Melvin M. Belli (Reviewer), George H. Tyne (Reviewer), William J. Bowe (Reviewer)
Book Reviews, Edmund M. Morgan (Reviewer), Albert Williams (Reviewer), J. Warren Madden (Reviewer), Melvin M. Belli (Reviewer), George H. Tyne (Reviewer), William J. Bowe (Reviewer)
Vanderbilt Law Review
Book Reviews
The Hearsay Rule
By R. W. Baker
London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons,Ltd., 1950. Pp. xxi, 180
reviewer: Edmund M. Morgan
===================================
Self-Incrimination: What Can an Accused Person be Compelled to Do?
By Fred E. Inbau
Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1950.Pp. x, 91. $2.50
reviewer: Albert Williams
===============================
Administrative Law
By Kenneth C. Davis
St. Paul: West Pub. Co.,1951. Pp. xvi, 1024. $8.00
Administrative Law: A Test
By Reginald Parker
Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1952. Pp. x, 344. $5.50
Administrative Agencies and the Courts
By Frank E. Cooper
Ann Arbor; University of Michigan Law School, 1951. Pp. …
The First Amendment And Evils That Congress Has A Right To Prevent, Alexander Meiklejohn
The First Amendment And Evils That Congress Has A Right To Prevent, Alexander Meiklejohn
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Problems Of Yesteryear -- Commerce And Due Process, Robert L. Stern
The Problems Of Yesteryear -- Commerce And Due Process, Robert L. Stern
Vanderbilt Law Review
Less than fifteen years ago, there were constitutional problems important enough to stir the country, to threaten the sanctity of the Supreme Court. These were the culmination of at least three decades of judicial controversy, in which the pressure of events brought criticism of the Court's decisions, both in noteworthy dissenting opinions and outside, to a new height. Fifteen years later, there still are difficult and important constitutional problems, and there still is criticism of the Supreme Court's decisions--though on a relatively minor scale. But the issues which rocked more than the legal world in the 1930's and in the …
The Supreme Court And Civil Liberties, Paul A. Freund
The Supreme Court And Civil Liberties, Paul A. Freund
Vanderbilt Law Review
The evolution of the enforcement of First Amendment guarantees under the aegis of the Fourteenth is an interesting study in the throwing up of bridges before and the burning of them behind, characteristic of juridical-advance. The protection of property and of liberty of contract had long since been assured under decisions applying'the Fourteenth Amendment. The interests of a teacher and of a private school, challenging interference with their pursuits, were well calculated to furnish the span between proprietary and forensic rights. When the span was crossed the newly taken ground provided a new base for advance. Freedom of speech, recognized …
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
Vanderbilt Law Review
We have recently been reminded that one of the current and recurrent quandaries of the Supreme Court of the United States arises from the American constitutional system's counterpart of the philosophical problem of the One and the Many. When an individual's freedom is involved, the question is whether and to what degree state legislators, public officials and judicial officers shall be called upon to enforce standards of respect for personal liberties defined by the Federal Constitution and the United States Supreme Court; or, put another way, how far the first eight amendments of the Federal Constitution are incorporated into the …
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Book Review. Free Speech And Its Relation To Self-Government By Alexander Meiklejohn, John P. Frank
Book Review. Free Speech And Its Relation To Self-Government By Alexander Meiklejohn, John P. Frank
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Limitation Of Religious Liberty, Chester J. Antieau
The Limitation Of Religious Liberty, Chester J. Antieau
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religious Liberty And The Fourteenth Amendment, Ivan C. Rutledge
Religious Liberty And The Fourteenth Amendment, Ivan C. Rutledge
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Post-War Protection Of Freedom Of Opinion - A Study Of Supreme Court Attitudes, Raymon T. Johnson
Post-War Protection Of Freedom Of Opinion - A Study Of Supreme Court Attitudes, Raymon T. Johnson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Church And State - The Mandate Of The Establishment Clause: Wall Of Separation Or Benign Neutrality., William J. Cornelius
Church And State - The Mandate Of The Establishment Clause: Wall Of Separation Or Benign Neutrality., William J. Cornelius
St. Mary's Law Journal
Instead of continuing down the path of confusing, contradictory, and inconsistent nonestablishment clause decisions, the Court should opt for a new approach—benign neutrality. The Court currently follows one of three general approaches when deciding nonestablishment clause issues—Wall of Separation theory, Strict Neutrality theory, or the Accommodation theory. None of these three approaches has led to any clear standards or principles. The Wall of Separation theory has been argued to be the most historically accurate representation of the Framer’s intent, but that is inaccurate. Instead, the Framers pursued religious freedom instead of complete separation in order to partially avoid usurpation by …
Constitutional Law: First Amendment Rights: Goodbye To Free Student Press?, Deborah Jane Clarke
Constitutional Law: First Amendment Rights: Goodbye To Free Student Press?, Deborah Jane Clarke
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.