Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
-
- Legal History (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Comparative Politics (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Political Theory (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Torts (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
"Crimtorts" As Corporate Just Deserts, Thomas Koenig, Michael Rustad
"Crimtorts" As Corporate Just Deserts, Thomas Koenig, Michael Rustad
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Just as Grant Gilmore described "contorts" that lie on the borderline between contract and tort law, the authors coin the term "crimtort" to identify the expanding common ground between criminal and tort law. Although the concept of crimtort can be broadly applied to many areas of the law, this Article focuses on the primary crimtort remedy - punitive damages. The deterrent power of punitive damages lies in the wealth-calibration of the defendant's punishment. For corporations this means that punitive damages will reflect the firm's net income or net worth. The theoretical danger is that juries will abuse wealth by redistributing …
Charting The Influences On The Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study Of Judicial Reasoning, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Charting The Influences On The Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study Of Judicial Reasoning, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise, Andrew P. Morriss
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In 1988, hundreds of federal district judges were suddenly confronted with the need to render a decision on the constitutionality of the Sentencing Reform Act and the newly promulgated criminal Sentencing Guidelines. Never before has a question of such importance and involving such significant issues of constitutional law mandated the immediate and simultaneous attention of such a large segment of the federal trial bench. Accordingly, this event provides an archetypal model for exploring the influence of social background, ideology, judicial role and institution, and other factors on judicial decisionmaking. Based upon a unique set of written decisions involving an identical …
Judging Rules, Ruling Judges, Stephen C. Yeazell
Judging Rules, Ruling Judges, Stephen C. Yeazell
Law and Contemporary Problems
Bureaucracy and complexity are not pejorative terms, but they are limiting terms, and it makes sense to examine the limitations that inhere in them. The US needs to return from a system of judicially created rules back to a system of judicially scrutinized rules.
On Not Making Law, Mitu Gulati, C. M. A. Mccauliff
On Not Making Law, Mitu Gulati, C. M. A. Mccauliff
Law and Contemporary Problems
Having argued that it is important to think about court norms, Gulati and McCauliff describe data on the publication practices of the various circuits. The data suggest that there are radical differences in the norms.
Did The Civil Justice Reform Act Of 1990 Actually Expire?, Carl Tobias
Did The Civil Justice Reform Act Of 1990 Actually Expire?, Carl Tobias
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) was intended to reduce the expense and delay associated with federal district court litigation by requiring courts to study and adopt new procedures. The CJRA's gains, however, may be erased by the uncertainty surrounding its sunset provision. Professor Tobias argues that Congress or the Judicial Conference should resolve the uncertainty by proclaiming that the CJRA has expired, thus forcing districts to abrogate procedures inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Picking Federal Judges: A Mysterious Alchemy, Michael D. Schattman
Picking Federal Judges: A Mysterious Alchemy, Michael D. Schattman
Michigan Law Review
I have twice been nominated to the federal bench by President Clinton. The first nomination, in December 1995, lapsed at the end of the 104th Congress. I was renominated in March 1997. I have never had a hearing and never had a letter from the Senate Judiciary Committee requesting additional information. In 1995 and again in 1997 the White House precleared my nomination with my two home-state Republican senators. Originally, I was nominated before the scheduled retirement date of the judge I was named to replace, which gives knowledgeable readers an idea of the lack of controversy surrounding my appointment. …
Tribal Court Praxis: One Year In The Life Of Twenty Indian Tribal Courts, Nell Jessup Newton
Tribal Court Praxis: One Year In The Life Of Twenty Indian Tribal Courts, Nell Jessup Newton
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionalization Of Law In The United States, William B. Fisch, Richard S. Kay
The Constitutionalization Of Law In The United States, William B. Fisch, Richard S. Kay
Faculty Publications
The constitution is that the federal courts and a majority of state court systems will only entertain a constitutional claim in the context of a concrete dispute involving adversary parties with a specific stake in the outcome, and abstract review in these systems is unknown.
Statutory Interpretation Of Federal Jurisdictional Statutes: Jurisdiction Of The Private Right Of Action Under The Tcpa, Fabian D. Gonell
Statutory Interpretation Of Federal Jurisdictional Statutes: Jurisdiction Of The Private Right Of Action Under The Tcpa, Fabian D. Gonell
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998: The Sun Sets On California's Blue Sky Laws, David M. Lavine, Adam C. Pritchard
The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998: The Sun Sets On California's Blue Sky Laws, David M. Lavine, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
It is often said that California sets the pace for changes in America's tastes. Trends established in California often find their way into the heartland, having a profound effect on our nation's cultural scene. Nouvelle cuisine, the dialect of the Valley Girl and rollerblading all have their genesis on the West Coast. The most recent trend to emerge from California, instead of catching on in the rest of the country, has been stopped dead in its tracks by a legislative rebuke from Washington, D.C. California's latest, albeit short-lived, contribution to the nation was a migration of securities fraud class actions …
Constitutional Structure As A Limitation On The Scope Of The "Law Of Nations" In The Alien Tort Claims Act, Donald J. Kochan
Constitutional Structure As A Limitation On The Scope Of The "Law Of Nations" In The Alien Tort Claims Act, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
Jurisdiction matters. Outside of the set of jurisdictional constraints, the judiciary is at sea; it poses a threat to the separation of powers and risks becoming a dangerous and domineering branch. Jurisdictional limitations serve a particularly important function when the judiciary is dealing with issues of international law. Since much of international law concerns foreign relations, the province of the executive and, in part, the legislature, the danger that the judiciary will act in a policy-making role or will frustrate the functions of the political branches is especially great. The Framers of the Constitution were particularly concerned with constructing a …