Law Commons^™

Interpreting Judicial Interpretations Of The Criminal Statutes Of The Trafficking Victims Protection Act: Ten Years Later, Mohamed Mattar

Mohammad Mattar

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) established for the first time the crime of trafficking in persons. This article will analyze court cases that have been decided under the TVPA. The article will show that American courts, relying upon the text of the criminal statutes of the TVPA, as well as the findings of Congress, have broadened the interpretation of the offenses recognized under the Act to expand criminal liability, whether in cases of sex trafficking or labor trafficking. The article will also address cases in which the TVPA was challenged on constitutional grounds and whether it may apply on …

Treaties And The Constitution: Enforcing Treaties Against The States, David Sloss

David Sloss

Since the end of the Cold War, the nation’s leading foreign affairs scholars have debated issues involving the domestic application of treaties. The debate implicates fundamental constitutional questions concerning federalism, separation of powers, and individual rights. Central to the debate is the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaties. Despite deep ideological divisions between nationalists and transnationalists, partisans on both sides agree on two points: first, that the “intent of the treaty makers” is the touchstone for self-execution analysis; and second, that Chief Justice Marshall applied the intent-based doctrine in his seminal opinion in Foster v. Neilson. The consensus view is …

Compensating Market Value Losses: Rethinking The Theory Of Damages In A Market Economy, Steven L. Schwarcz

Steven L Schwarcz

The BP Gulf oil spill and the Toyota car recalls have highlighted an important legal anomaly that has been overlooked by scholars—judicial inconsistency and confusion in ruling whether to compensate for the loss in market value of wrongfully affected property. This article seeks to understand the anomaly and, in the process, build a stronger foundation for enabling courts to decide when—and in what amounts—to award damages for market value losses. To that end, the article analyzes the normative rationales for generally awarding damages, adapting those rationales to derive a theory of damages that not only covers market value losses of …

A Crowning Achievement In Protecting High Ranking Officials From Unreasonable Depositions: The Impact Of The Crown Central Test, Scott A. Mager

scott a mager

In an increasingly litigious society, the attempt to first set depositions of high-ranking corporate executives, who are often referred to as “apex officials,” has become commonplace. While these executives rarely have personal knowledge of the facts and issues surrounding a given case, broad-stroked claims against parent companies and lax discovery rules seem to serve as a launching pad to harass executives and extort settlements through threats of—and in many cases the actual taking of—depositions from chief executive officers, chief operating officers, chief financial officers, or other apex executives. In recent years, courts across the country have sought to articulate the …

Treaties And The Constitution: Enforcing Treaties Against The States, David Sloss

David Sloss

Since the end of the Cold War, the nation’s leading foreign affairs scholars have debated issues involving the domestic application of treaties. The debate implicates fundamental constitutional questions concerning federalism, separation of powers, and individual rights. Central to the debate is the distinction between self-executing and non-self-executing treaties. Despite deep ideological divisions between nationalists and transnationalists, partisans on both sides agree on two points: first, that the “intent of the treaty makers” is the touchstone for self-execution analysis; and second, that Chief Justice Marshall applied the intent-based doctrine in his seminal opinion in Foster v. Neilson. The consensus view is …

In Defense Of The Substance-Procedure Dichotomy, Jennifer S. Hendricks

Jennifer S. Hendricks

John Hart Ely famously observed, “We were all brought up on sophisticated talk about the fluidity of the line between substance and procedure,” but for most of Erie’s history, the Supreme Court has answered the question “Does this state law govern in federal court?” with a “yes” or a “no.” Beginning, however, with Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, and continuing with Semtek v. Lockheed and Shady Grove v. Allstate, a shifting coalition of justices has pursued a third path. Instead of declaring state law applicable or inapplicable, they have claimed for themselves the prerogative to fashion law that purportedly accommodates …

The Created, The Fallen, And The Redeemed—The Symbolism Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Christopher G. Hastings, Nelson P. Milller, Curt A. Benson

Christopher G Hastings

The Federal Rules of Evidence, taken as a whole, represent an ethical system—not just norms, values, or cultural constructs but, moreover, a genuine way of comprehending the world consistent with our best understanding of how it would, if not constrained, truly operate. Underlying each rule are assumptions about the nature and dispositions of lawyers, clients, witnesses, jurors, and judges, as well as the nature of evidence itself. Those assumptions symbolize what the rules’ promulgators understand to be the imperatives of justice in a system peopled by the created, the fallen, and the redeemed. Citing each of the 67 Federal Rules …

Limitations Imposed On The Dual Sovereignty Doctrine By Federal And State Governments, Thomas White

Thomas White

Because the dual sovereignty doctrine permits multiple prosecutions of an individual by state and federal governments for essentially the same conduct, the increasing federalization of criminal law has marginalized much of the double jeopardy protection afforded by the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s admonitions to the federal government to judiciously exercise the ability to conduct subsequent prosecutions under federal law following state prosecutions led to the Justice Department’s 1959 creation of the Petite doctrine which limits and prioritizes prosecutions if overlapping jurisdiction exists. Over half of the states, at one time, limited or prohibited subsequent prosecutions and half still do. This …

Judicial Discretion In Constitutional Cases, Todd E. Pettys

Todd E. Pettys

A damaging dichotomy is hindering the nation’s ability to talk intelligently and constructively about the constitutional work of the courts. The “legitimacy dichotomy” holds that, when adjudicating constitutional disputes, judges either obey the sovereign people’s determinate constitutional instructions or illegitimately trump the sovereign people’s value judgments with their own. The legitimacy dichotomy leaves little or no room for the possibility that an array of conflicting interpretations of the Constitution might be reasonably available to a judge; it leaves little or no room, in other words, for judicial discretion. This article begins by examining the legitimacy dichotomy from three different vantage …

Prosecutorial Accountability After Connick V. Thompson, George Weiss

George Weiss

Both recent Supreme Court decisions such as Van de Kamp v. Goldstein and Connick v. Thompson, as well as newspaper incidents such as the prosecuotrial misconduct of Michael Nifong and the prosecutor of the Ted Stevens case, have brought renewed attention to the issue of prosecutorial accountability. Though many have, in the past, lamented or tired to measure prosecutorial misconduct, this article argues that the theory of the Connick case (failure to train prosecutors liability under section 1983), while failing to in itself represent a new method of accountability, (failure to respond and discipline prosecutors) tweaking Connick's theory slightly may …

A More Promising Promised Land: Israel Copes With An Influx Of Asylum Seekers By Implementing The 1951 Convention Relating To The Status Of Refugees And The 1967 Protocol, Aliyah M. Phillips

Aliyah M Phillips

This Comment addresses the State of Israel’s most recent actions in coping with a mass influx of African asylum seekers, and whether those actions represent compliance with the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (“1951 Convention”), and the 1967 Protocol. Past scholarship has criticized Israel’s response to the influx, focusing on a lack of compliance. By examining Israel’s most recent practices with regard to asylum seekers, this Comment takes a novel and nuanced approach to identifying Israel’s compliance with the 1951 Convention. The argument set forth in this Comment operates from the presumption that a state’s compliance with …

The Medical Device Federal Preemption Trilogy: Salvaging Due Process For Injured Patients, Demetria D. Frank-Jackson

Demetria D Frank-Jackson

Ignoring over a century of tort law precedence, ultimately leaving thousands of people all over the country injured by medical devices without remedy, the prevailing jurisprudence on medical device federal preemption is both current and relevant. Due to the inherent ambiguity of the preemption provision Medical Device Amendments of 1976, where contemporary medical device litigation had its beginnings, the regulatory nature of common law tort claims against medical device manufacturers has been overwhelming called into question. Given this socio-judicial backdrop, the Article focuses on two rapidly developing areas of law: (1) preemption of certain medical device claims following the U.S. …

Legal Ethics And Campaign Contributions: The Professional Responsibility To Pay For Justice, Keith Swisher

Keith Swisher

Lawyers as johns, and judges as prostitutes? Across the United States, attorneys (“johns,” as the analogy goes) are giving campaign money to judges (“prostitutes”) and then asking those judges for legal favors in the form of rulings for themselves and their clients. Despite its pervasiveness, this practice has been rarely mentioned, much less theorized, from the attorneys’ ethical point of view. With the surge of money into judicial elections (e.g., Citizens United v. FEC), and the Supreme Court’s renewed interest in protecting justice from the corrupting effects of campaign money (e.g., Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.), these conflicting currents …

Decision-Making Patterns At The First Trial Of International Criminal Court: A Perspective On The Icc, Aldo Zammit Borda

Aldo Zammit Borda

The first trials of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (“ICTY”) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (“ICTR”) resulted in convictions of the accused. This Article seeks to understand this observation by applying new institutionalist perspectives to decision-making processes of international criminal courts and tribunals. This Article argues that the first trials of such courts are affected by a learning curve and should be differentiated from other trials because of, inter alia, the novelty of the proceedings, the absence of previous jurisprudence, and the need to develop modi operandi, often from scratch. It then discusses decision-making patterns …

Risk Regulation And Regulatory Litigation, Patrick A. Luff

Patrick A. Luff

Since at least the 1960s, when Congress enacted civil rights statutes that provided for private enforcement, courts have been hotbeds of public policy. Only recently, however, has this phenomenon been recognized for what it is: courts have become essential actors in the regulatory state. What little scholarship there is on the use of courts to achieve regulatory ends is often heavy on rhetoric, but short on theory. While commentators have been quick to criticize the phenomenon of regulatory litigation, they have done little to determine what it actually is. As a result, the young field of regulatory litigation lacks fundamental …

Tangled Up In Knots: How Continued Federal Jurisdiction Over Sexual Predators On Indian Reservations Hobbles Effective Law Enforcement To The Detriment Of Indian Women, Suzianne D. Painter-Thorne

Suzianne D. Painter-Thorne

An Indian woman is two-and-a-half times more likely than any other American woman to be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Nevertheless, because of a confusing tangle of jurisdictional rules, she is four times less likely to see her assailant arrested. She is even less likely to see him stand trial. Because jurisdiction over most sexual assaults is vested in the federal government, Indian tribes are not allowed to arrest or prosecute most of the suspects who commit sexual assaults on tribal lands. Consequently, tribal lands have become safe havens for sexual predators, who can commit their offenses with impunity and …

Juvenile Justice Reform 2.0, Tamar R. Birckhead

Tamar R Birckhead

Before the 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, the United States Supreme Court’s exercise of judicial review did not support the notion that constitutional litigation could be an effective instrument of social reform. The Court’s principled rejection of racially segregated public education, however, gave new legitimacy to the concept of judicial review, transforming it from an obstacle into a principal means of achieving social progress. Since then, federal courts have impacted public policy in many areas – from housing, welfare, and transportation to mental health institutions, prisons, and juvenile courts. Yet, there are inherent structural challenges to effecting …

Painting Black Spaces Red, Black, And Green: The Constitutionality Of The Mural Movement, Jesse R. Merriam

Jesse R Merriam

“We live by symbols,” Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote. This aphorism certainly rings true in many American inner cities, where murals depicting racial images, such as African symbols and portraits of famous African Americans, pervade the urban landscape. Indeed, the “by” in Holmes’s statement applies to inner-city residents with special force because these residents not only live close to murals, but also according to the symbols contained therein. Pablo Neruda, the Chilean writer and politician, is reported to have described this relationship in more populist language, claiming: “Murals are the people’s blackboard.” But Neruda’s statement obscures the fact that murals …

Originalism As An Anchor For The Sixth Amendment, Jeffrey L. Fisher

Jeffrey L Fisher

Originalism is sometimes criticized as merely a means to justify conservative results. And cases do indeed exist in which the Supreme Court has divided along liberal-conservative lines, and conservatives have played originalism as a purported trump card. Last Term’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, interpreting the Second Amendment as including an individual right to bear arms, is a recent example.

When it comes to criminal procedure, however, things are not so simple. This Essay examines two lines of cases: first, those involving the Court's reinvigoration of the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial, and second, those involving the …

State Law, U.S. Power, Foreign Disputes: Understanding The Extraterritorial Effects Of State Law In The Wake Of Morrison V. National Australia Bank, Katherine Florey

Katherine J. Florey

The recent Supreme Court case of Morrison v. National Australia Bank embraced a sweeping version of the presumption against extraterritorial application of federal law, and in doing so dramatically restricted the potential applicability of federal securities law to foreign litigants and transactions. This development has attracted a wealth of commentary, most of which has focused on the implications for the future treatment of federal statutes that may apply to foreign conduct.

Scholars have overlooked, however, perhaps the most remarkable consequence of the Court’s opinion in Morrison: the fact that it in effects makes state law more widely applicable abroad than …

A New Public Interest Appellate Model: Public Counsel’S Court-Based Self-Help Clinic And Pro Bono “Triage” For Indigent Pro Se Civil Litigants On Appeal, Meehan Rasch

Meehan Rasch

A variety of new “pro se” or “pro bono” appellate programs have been sprouting up around the country in recent years. Courts, bar associations, and legal services and advocacy organizations are implementing these projects to grapple with the challenges raised by increasing numbers of pro se (self-represented) and indigent civil litigants in appellate courts. Judicial operational systems designed on the premise of adequately counseled parties are ill-prepared to handle an influx of self-represented litigants, posing frustrations for both pro se litigants and court personnel. The expansion of pro se litigation strains appellate court resources and staff, but because of the …

Rethinking Rule 59'S Appellate 'Waiver' For Magistrate Judge Adjudication Post-Olano, Meehan Rasch

Meehan Rasch

In 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Thomas v. Arn that a federal court of appeals may establish a rule that failure to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendations "waives" both the right to further review by the district court and the right to appeal the judgment to the court of appeals. The Arn majority determined that such a rule did not remove the essential attributes of the judicial power from the Article III court or elevate non-life-tenured magistrate judges to the functional equivalents of Article III judges. Rather, loss of the right to any Article …

Foreign Citizens In Transnational Class Actions, Jay Tidmarsh, Linda Sandstrom Simard

Jay Tidmarsh

This Article addresses an increasingly important question: When, if ever, should foreign citizens be included as members of an American class action? The existing consensus holds that courts should exclude from class membership those foreign citizens whose country does not recognize an American class judgment. Our analysis begins by establishing that this consensus is flawed. Rather, to minimize the costs associated with relitigation in a foreign forum, we must distinguish between foreign claimants who are likely to commence a subsequent foreign proceeding from those who are unlikely to do so; distinguishing between those who come from recognizing and nonrecognizing countries …

The Puzzling Resistance To Judicial Review Of The Legislative Process, Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

Dr. Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

Should courts have the power to examine the legislature’s enactment process and strike down statutes enacted contrary to procedural lawmaking requirements? This idea remains highly controversial. While substantive judicial review is well-established and often taken for granted, many judges and scholars see judicial review of the legislative process as utterly objectionable. This Article challenges that prevalent position and establishes the case for judicial review of the legislative process. The Article contends that, ironically, some of the major arguments for substantive judicial review in constitutional theory, and even the arguments in Marbury v. Madison itself, are actually more persuasive when applied …

En Banc Revealed: Procedure, Politics, And Privacy, Abigail Stecker

Abigail Stecker

The en banc process is complex and perhaps mysterious. Through this process, a majority of judges on a federal court of appeals can vote to rehear a case that its own three-judge panel already decided; thus, rehearing a case en banc allows the court to issue a superseding decision with highly precedential effect. In theory, en banc rehearing allows all of the court’s judges to determine circuit law, rather than just three judges. In the Ninth Circuit, specifically, multiple events must occur before the court will rehear a case en banc. Many of these events are complicated and private, despite …

Justice Stevens' Jurisprudence Of Respect, Nancy S. Marder

Nancy S. Marder

No abstract provided.

Hybridizing Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson

Scott Dodson

Modern American Supreme Court Judicial Methodology And Its Origins: A Critical Analysis Of The Legal Thought Of Roscoe Pound, Beau James Brock

Beau James Brock

The pragmatic philosophy of law espoused by Pound has come to be regarded as a textbook method of adjudication. The most telling commentators of all have been the judges themselves who utilize his balancing of social interests in their adjudication of cases. Finally, his pragmatism has been assimilated into mainstream legal thought producing innovative attempts to address the possibly unanswerable question of the proper valuation of competing interests.