Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- First Amendment (9)
- Law and Society (8)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Religion Law (6)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Sexuality and the Law (4)
- Social Welfare Law (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Courts (3)
- Economics (3)
- Education Law (3)
- Election Law (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Military, War, and Peace (3)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Publication
-
- Alan E Garfield (10)
- John F. Stinneford (6)
- Khagesh Gautam (3)
- Mel Cousins (3)
- Sharon E. Rush (3)
-
- Brian Christopher Jones (2)
- Charles W. Collier (2)
- Darren L Hutchinson (2)
- Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba (2)
- Manoj S. Mate (2)
- Renée M. Hutchins (2)
- Shubhankar Dam (2)
- Adam A Marshall (1)
- Ashutosh Bhagwat (1)
- Barry Cushman (1)
- Bradley J Young JD PhD (1)
- Carl J. Circo (1)
- Christopher W. Schmidt (1)
- Daniel Schuker (1)
- Donald B. Tobin (1)
- Eduardo M. Peñalver (1)
- Elizabeth Dale (1)
- Gillian K Hadfield (1)
- Gregory P. Magarian (1)
- Hadar Aviram (1)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (1)
- Howard Darmstadter (1)
- Iain Field (1)
- Jason P. Nance (1)
- Julia Simon-Kerr (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 80
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Founders’ Origination Clause (And Implications For The Affordable Care Act), Prof. Robert G. Natelson
The Founders’ Origination Clause (And Implications For The Affordable Care Act), Prof. Robert G. Natelson
Robert G. Natelson
This Article is the first comprehensive examination of the original legal force of the Constitution’s Origination Clause, drawing not merely on the records of the 1787-90 constitutional debates, but on founding-era British and American legislative practice and other sources. This Article defines the bills governed by the Origination Clause, the precise meaning of the House origination requirement, and the extent of the Senate’s amendment power. For illustrative purposes, the Article tests against its findings the currently-litigated claim that the financial penalty for failure to acquire individual health insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is invalid as a …
Prisoners And Habeas Privileges Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Lee B. Kovarsky
Prisoners And Habeas Privileges Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Lee B. Kovarsky
Lee Kovarsky
The U.S. Reports contain no answer to a million-dollar question: are state prisoners constitutionally entitled to a federal habeas forum? The Supreme Court has consistently ducked the basic constitutional issue, and academic work on the question idles on familiar themes. The strongest existing argument that state prisoners are constitutionally entitled to a federal habeas forum involves a theory of incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. I provide a new and different account: specifically, that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges and Immunities Clause (“PI Clause”) guarantees a habeas privilege as a feature of national citizenship, and that the corresponding habeas …
Is Contraception Mandate ‘No Big Deal?’, Alan E. Garfield
Is Contraception Mandate ‘No Big Deal?’, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Taxing Offshore Transactions In India And The Territoriality Clause - A Case For Substantial Constitutional Limitations On Indian Parliament's Power To Retrospectively Amend The Income Tax Act, Khagesh Gautam
Khagesh Gautam
No abstract provided.
Punição E Constituição: Cinco Princípios Para O Futuro Da Democracia Brasileira (Punishment And The Constitution: Five Principles For The Future Of Brazilian Democracy), Paulo Barrozo
Paulo Barrozo
Portuguese Abstract: Publicado nos Anais da XXII Conferência da Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil realizada em 2014, este ensaio elabora cinco princípios para orientar a reforma do sistema penal brasileiro visando traze-lo ao centro da arquitetura constitucional de um país comprometido com os valores do auto-governo democrático e dos direitos individuais. English Abstract: Published in the annals of the of the Brazilian Bar Association XXII annual conference in 2014, this essay offers five principles to guide reform of the Brazilian criminal justice system in order to bring it to the center of the constitutional framework of a country committed to …
Political Advocacy And Taxable Entities: Are They The Next "Loophole"?, Donald B. Tobin
Political Advocacy And Taxable Entities: Are They The Next "Loophole"?, Donald B. Tobin
Donald B. Tobin
No abstract provided.
The "Progress Clause": An Empirical Analysis Based On The Constitutional Foundation Of Patent Law, Lori Andrews
The "Progress Clause": An Empirical Analysis Based On The Constitutional Foundation Of Patent Law, Lori Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
Here’S Some Malarkey: Judges Are Umpires, Alan E. Garfield
Here’S Some Malarkey: Judges Are Umpires, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
The Warren And Burger Courts On State, Parent, And Child Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Analysis And Proposed Methodology, Sharon E. Rush
The Warren And Burger Courts On State, Parent, And Child Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Analysis And Proposed Methodology, Sharon E. Rush
Sharon E. Rush
Developing a legal framework for analyzing children's rights is difficult. In part, this difficulty stems from the inherent ambiguity of the term "child." Within this general rubric are individuals whose age, maturity, education, and developmental levels encompass a wide rage. A more important obstacle stems from the conflict between the democratic ideals of individual freedom and the sanctity of the family unit. Whether children can be given certain rights without destroying parental authority over the family is a dilemma. Taking into account these opposing principles, a simplified methodology for analyzing and resolving conflicts among the state, parent, and child is …
How To Think About The Constitution, Howard Darmstadter
How To Think About The Constitution, Howard Darmstadter
Howard Darmstadter
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of The Criminal Organisation Acts In Australia: Where To Now In 2014?, Bradley J. Young
The Constitutionality Of The Criminal Organisation Acts In Australia: Where To Now In 2014?, Bradley J. Young
Bradley J Young JD PhD
Efforts to disrupt and limit criminal organisations involved in serious criminal activity as well as directly control members and their associates were introduced in Queensland with the Criminal Organisation Act 2009 (Qld). The purpose for this legislation and the debate over the head of power under which it operates has received much attention and has been again examined this year in the high court case Pompano (2013). The active and applicable laws across a number of states in Australia that can be categorised as control order legislation have proven themselves problematic and still have broader societal application beyond bikie gangs. …
Lochner, Liquor, And Longshoremen: A Puzzle In Progressive Era Federalism, Barry Cushman
Lochner, Liquor, And Longshoremen: A Puzzle In Progressive Era Federalism, Barry Cushman
Barry Cushman
In 1890, the Supreme Court shocked and thrilled the civilized world with the announcement that dry states could not prohibit the sale of liquor shipped in from outside the state. So long as the out-of-state goods remained in their "original packages," the Court held they retained their character as interstate commerce subject only to federal regulation. The consequences for the cause of local sobriety were, predictably, catastrophic. The proliferation in temperance territory of "original package saloons," at which one could purchase liquor free from the superintendence of local liquor authorities, was appalling to dry eyes. Members of Congress immediately proposed …
Instead Of Government Truth Police, A Wiser Course Is Informed Citizenry, Alan E. Garfield
Instead Of Government Truth Police, A Wiser Course Is Informed Citizenry, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
India: Supreme Court Recriminalises "Carnal Intercourse Against The Order Of Nature", Shubhankar Dam
India: Supreme Court Recriminalises "Carnal Intercourse Against The Order Of Nature", Shubhankar Dam
Shubhankar Dam
Justiciability And The Role Of Courts In Adequacy Litigation: Preserving The Constitutional Right To Education, Robynn K. Sturm, Julia A. Simon-Kerr
Justiciability And The Role Of Courts In Adequacy Litigation: Preserving The Constitutional Right To Education, Robynn K. Sturm, Julia A. Simon-Kerr
Julia Simon-Kerr
In the first study of opinions handed down in education adequacy litigation between January 2005 and January 2008, this paper shows a marked shift away from outcomes favorable to adequacy plaintiffs. Following two decades in which courts spurred significant reforms in our nation’s neediest schools by interpreting the education clauses of their state constitutions to guarantee an “adequate” education for all students, the years 2005 to 2008 have seen a dramatic change in the judicial response to adequacy litigation. Through an analysis of the latest body of cases, this paper shows that separation of powers concerns have begun to drive …
Taming The "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, Lili Levi
Taming The "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, Lili Levi
Lili Levi
Abstract: As technology undermines the economic model supporting traditional newspapers, power shifts from the watchdog press to those it watches. Worldwide calls for increased press “responsibility” are one result. Pending British press reform provides a troubling example with far-ranging implications for freedom of the press. Under the guise of modest press self-regulation, the U.K. is currently poised to upend 300 years of press freedom via the recently-approved Royal Charter for Self-Regulation of the Press. The Royal Charter was adopted in response to the moral panic engendered by Britain’s tabloid phone-hacking scandal. An example of 20th Century regulation poorly fitted …
Making The Case For Contraception Over Religious Views, Alan E. Garfield
Making The Case For Contraception Over Religious Views, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Preventing Balkanization Or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique Of The New Equal Protection, Darren L. Hutchinson
Preventing Balkanization Or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique Of The New Equal Protection, Darren L. Hutchinson
Darren L Hutchinson
Abstract
Preventing Balkanization or Facilitating Racial Domination: A Critique of the
New Equal Protection
The Supreme Court requires that equal protection plaintiffs prove defendants acted with discriminatory intent. The intent rule has insulated from judicial invalidation numerous policies that harmfully impact racial and ethnic minorities. Court doctrine also mandates that state actors remain colorblind. The colorblindness doctrine has caused the Court to invalidate many policies that were designed to ameliorate the conditions of racial inequality. Taken together, these two equality doctrines facilitate racial domination. The Court justifies this outcome on the ground that the Constitution does not protect “group rights.” …
Fundamental Right To Free Primary Education In India A Critical Examination Of Society For Unaided Private Schools Of Rajasthan V. Union Of India, Khagesh Gautam
Khagesh Gautam
In 2002, the Constitution of India was amended and article 21A was inserted into Part III of the Constitution that provides for Fundamental Rights. Article 21A, styled as a positive right, provided for free and compulsory education to all children between the age of 6 and 14 years. To enforce this positive right, the Parliament enacted the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009. The Act, amongst other things, provided for horizontal affirmative action by reserving 25% seats in all schools (i.e. State run, State funded or Privately run) in favour of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes …
Infusing The Meaning Of “Cruel And Unusual” Through The Digital Public Sphere: How The Internet Can Change The Debate On The Morality Of Capital Punishment, Adam A. Marshall
Infusing The Meaning Of “Cruel And Unusual” Through The Digital Public Sphere: How The Internet Can Change The Debate On The Morality Of Capital Punishment, Adam A. Marshall
Adam A Marshall
In this paper, I suggest new strategies that abolitionists should adopt in the debate over the morality of the death penalty. As the Eighth Amendment “draw[s] its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society”, advocates for abolishing the death penalty should develop strategies based on the moral theories of Adam Smith to leverage the power of the internet and ensure all citizens feel the effects of the death penalty in order to stimulate debate over its morality. By examining these concepts through the case of Troy Davis, we can see how the …
The Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Divide, Christopher W. Schmidt
The Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Divide, Christopher W. Schmidt
Christopher W. Schmidt
Contemporary legal discourse differentiates “civil rights” from “civil liberties.” The former are generally understood as protections against discriminatory treatment, the latter as freedom from oppressive government authority. This Essay explains how this differentiation arose and considers its consequences.
Although there is a certain inherent logic to the civil rights-civil liberties divide, it in fact is the product of the unique circumstances of a particular moment in history. In the early years of the Cold War, liberal anticommunists sought to distinguish their incipient interest in the cause of racial equality from their belief that national security required limitations on the speech …
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In Bankruptcy And The Plight Of The Debtor, Timothy R. Tarvin
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In Bankruptcy And The Plight Of The Debtor, Timothy R. Tarvin
Timothy R Tarvin
Religious Freedom And Workers’ Compensation - Big Sky Colony V Montana Department Of Labor And Industry, Mel Cousins
Religious Freedom And Workers’ Compensation - Big Sky Colony V Montana Department Of Labor And Industry, Mel Cousins
Mel Cousins
Social security and health care litigation has played a prominent role in the development of the jurisprudence concerning the religious clauses of the US Constitution. At the time of writing further litigation in this area is ongoing with initial rulings having been handed down in relation to challenges concerning the compatibility of the PPACA’s contraceptive mandate with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). This note considers an interesting recent decision of the Montana supreme court which considered the constitutionality of an extension of coverage under the Montana workers’ compensation code to colonies of the Hutterite (or Hutterian or Hutterische) Brethren …
Interpreting Acronyms And Epithets: Examining The Jurisprudential Significance (Or Lack Thereof), Brian Christopher Jones
Interpreting Acronyms And Epithets: Examining The Jurisprudential Significance (Or Lack Thereof), Brian Christopher Jones
Brian Christopher Jones
Given the rise in short title sophistication and their prominent use as evidence in U.S. v. Windsor, this essay argues that acronym short titles are a relatively unexplored interpretive phenomenon. Examining how acronyms should be approached in jurisprudence, the essay further explains how many titles are designed around a symbolic epithet, thus calling into question the interpretative value of such titles. Additionally, the essay touches on the recent NY and D.C. decisions regarding the NSA’s bulk telephony metadata collection system, and how the USA PATRIOT acronym may have played a symbolic (psycholinguistic) role.
Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
The Worst Test Of Truth: The "Marketplace Of Ideas" As Faulty Metaphor, Thomas W. Joo
The Worst Test Of Truth: The "Marketplace Of Ideas" As Faulty Metaphor, Thomas W. Joo
Thomas W Joo
In his famous dissent in Abrams v. United States, Justice Holmes proclaimed that “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.” This Article critiques the basic argument against speech regulation that has developed from the “marketplace of ideas” metaphor: that speech should be “free” because markets are “free,” and because free markets produce “truth.” These assertions about markets are taken for granted, but they portray markets and market regulation inaccurately; thus economic markets provide a poor analogy for the deregulation of speech.
First Amendment jurisprudence invokes the …
Begging To Be Constitutional, Magali Sanders
Begging To Be Constitutional, Magali Sanders
Magali J Sanders
This comment argues that a City of Miami ordinance prohibiting begging, soliciting, and panhandling in the Downtown business district is constitutional because it is aimed at combating the secondary effects of soliciting. Traditionally, courts have analyzed content-based and content-neutral speech restrictions using strict and intermediate scrutiny tests, respectively.
This comment urges courts to use the secondary effects test applied in City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., where the court upheld a zoning ordinance prohibiting adult movie theatres from locating within a certain distance of residential homes. The court focused on the purpose of the ordinance, which was to …
Religious Associations: Hosanna-Tabor And The Instrumental Value Of Religious Groups, Ashutosh Bhagwat
Religious Associations: Hosanna-Tabor And The Instrumental Value Of Religious Groups, Ashutosh Bhagwat
Ashutosh Bhagwat
In its 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church & Sch. V. EEOC, the Supreme Court held that the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment require recognition of a “ministerial exception” to general antidiscrimination statutes (in that case, the ADA), because religious institutions must have autonomy in selecting their ministers. In the course of its analysis, however, the Court made a very interesting move. In response to the government’s argument that the case could be resolved under the general First Amendment right of association, the Court responded that this position was “untenable,” and indeed “remarkable,” because the very existence of …
When Enough Is Enough: Location Tracking, Mosaic Theory, And Machine Learning, Steven M. Bellovin, Renée M. Hutchins, Tony Jebara, Sebastian Zimmeck
When Enough Is Enough: Location Tracking, Mosaic Theory, And Machine Learning, Steven M. Bellovin, Renée M. Hutchins, Tony Jebara, Sebastian Zimmeck
Renée M. Hutchins
Since 1967, when it decided Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court has tied the right to be free of unwanted government scrutiny to the concept of reasonable xpectations of privacy.[1] An evaluation of reasonable expectations depends, among other factors, upon an assessment of the intrusiveness of government action. When making such assessment historically the Court has considered police conduct with clear temporal, geographic, or substantive limits. However, in an era where new technologies permit the storage and compilation of vast amounts of personal data, things are becoming more complicated. A school of thought known as “mosaic theory” has stepped …
Stop Terry : Reasonable Suspicion, Race, And A Proposal To Limit Terry Stops, Renée M. Hutchins
Stop Terry : Reasonable Suspicion, Race, And A Proposal To Limit Terry Stops, Renée M. Hutchins
Renée M. Hutchins
The Terry doctrine, which grants a police officer the authority to stop and frisk based on his or her reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause, was created by the Supreme Court at a time when the nation con- fronted a particular moment of violent racial strife. Since Terry was decided, the Supreme Court has continued to expand the reach of the doctrine—which opened the door for potential abuse. Existing data is increasingly proving that the loosening of constitutional standards is causing substantial harms to people of color nationwide. This article joins the existing scholarly discussion surrounding this decision to suggest …