Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (94)
- Courts (18)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- First Amendment (16)
- Legal History (15)
-
- Criminal Law (14)
- Law and Politics (12)
- State and Local Government Law (12)
- Legislation (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (8)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (7)
- Education Law (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Arts and Humanities (6)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- International Law (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- President/Executive Department (5)
- Commercial Law (4)
- History (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (23)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (20)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
- SelectedWorks (5)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (4)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (4)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Valparaiso University (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- George Washington University Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (20)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Articles (6)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Seattle University Law Review (6)
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Josh Chafetz (4)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (4)
- University of Massachusetts Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- Richard W Garnett (3)
- Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy (3)
- Alan E Garfield (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Lectures and Presentations (2)
- John F. Stinneford (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- Peter J. Aschenbrenner (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Stephen M. Feldman (2)
- Valparaiso University Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects (1)
- Congressional Testimony (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 132
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Paul, Adam D'Antonio
Supreme Court, Bronx County, People V. Paul, Adam D'Antonio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitution Making In The Countries Of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development, Rett R. Ludwikowski
Constitution Making In The Countries Of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development, Rett R. Ludwikowski
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Who Speaks For The ‘People’ On Policy?, Alan E. Garfield
Who Speaks For The ‘People’ On Policy?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Calling Them As He Sees Them: The Disappearance Of Originalism In Justice Thomas's Opinions On Race, Joel K. Goldstein
Calling Them As He Sees Them: The Disappearance Of Originalism In Justice Thomas's Opinions On Race, Joel K. Goldstein
Maryland Law Review
During his first two decades on the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas has been associated with originalism and is often viewed as its leading judicial proponent. Justice Thomas has linked originalism with the effort to limit judicial discretion and to promote judicial impartiality. In cases dealing with many constitutional provisions, Justice Thomas has shown his commitment to originalism by often writing solitary concurrences and dissents advocating an originalist analysis of a problem. Yet in constitutional cases dealing with race, Justice Thomas routinely abandons originalism and embraces the sort of constitutional arguments based on morality or consequentialism that he often discounts. These …
The Scope Of Precedent, Randy J. Kozel
The Scope Of Precedent, Randy J. Kozel
Michigan Law Review
The scope of Supreme Court precedent is capacious. Justices of the Court commonly defer to sweeping rationales and elaborate doctrinal frameworks articulated by their predecessors. This practice infuses judicial precedent with the prescriptive power of enacted constitutional and statutory text. The lower federal courts follow suit, regularly abiding by the Supreme Court’s broad pronouncements. These phenomena cannot be explained by—and, indeed, oftentimes subvert—the classic distinction between binding holdings and dispensable dicta. This Article connects the scope of precedent with recurring and foundational debates about the proper ends of judicial interpretation. A precedent’s forward- looking effect should not depend on the …
What Is Criminal Restitution?, Cortney E. Lollar
What Is Criminal Restitution?, Cortney E. Lollar
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
A new form of restitution has become a core aspect of criminal punishment. Courts now order defendants to compensate victims for an increasingly broad category of losses, including emotional and psychological losses and losses for which the defendant was not found guilty. Criminal restitution therefore moves far beyond its traditional purpose of disgorging a defendant's ill-gotten gains. Instead, restitution has become a mechanism of imposing additional punishment. Courts, however, have failed to recognize the punitive nature of restitution and thus enter restitution orders without regard to the constitutional protections that normally attach to criminal proceedings. This Article deploys a novel …
Mexico's Legal Revolution: An Appraisal Of Its Recent Constitutional Changes, 1988-1995, Jorge A. Vargas
Mexico's Legal Revolution: An Appraisal Of Its Recent Constitutional Changes, 1988-1995, Jorge A. Vargas
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
License To Discriminate: How A Washington Florist Is Making The Case For Applying Intermediary Scrutiny To Sexual Orientation, Kendra Lacour
License To Discriminate: How A Washington Florist Is Making The Case For Applying Intermediary Scrutiny To Sexual Orientation, Kendra Lacour
Seattle University Law Review
Over the past few decades, the debate over sexual orientation has risen to the forefront of civil rights issues. Though the focus has generally been on the right to marriage, peripheral issues associated with the right to marriage—and with sexual orientation generally—have become more common in recent years. As the number of states permitting same-sex marriage—along with states prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation—increases, so too does the conflict between providers of public accommodations and those seeking their services. Never is this situation more problematic than when religious beliefs are cited as the basis for denying services to …
Toward A Federal Constitutional Right To Employment, R. George Wright
Toward A Federal Constitutional Right To Employment, R. George Wright
Seattle University Law Review
This Article outlines an argument for a federal constitutional right to employment. The Article begins by examining the harms and costs of involuntary long-term unemployment. It then discusses the historical contributions to our understanding of the value of work, before drawing on several well-established jurisprudential distinctions to explain why, and to justify initial optimism regarding a constitutional employment right.
Books Received, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Books Received, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Beyond The Schoolhouse Gates: The Unprecedented Expansion Of School Surveillance Authority Under Cyberbulling Laws, Emily Suski
Beyond The Schoolhouse Gates: The Unprecedented Expansion Of School Surveillance Authority Under Cyberbulling Laws, Emily Suski
Faculty Publications
For several years, states have grappled with the problem of cyberbullying and its sometimes devastating effects. Because cyberbullying often occurs between students, most states have understandably looked to schools to help address the problem. To that end, schools in forty-six states have the authority to intervene when students engage in cyberbullying. This solution seems all to the good unless a close examination of the cyberbullying laws and their implications is made. This Article explores some of the problematic implications of the cyberbullying laws. More specifically, it focuses on how the cyberbullying laws allow schools unprecedented surveillance authority over students. This …
Federal Roadblocks: The Constitution And The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, Ian Drake
Federal Roadblocks: The Constitution And The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, Ian Drake
Department of Political Science and Law Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works
The National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact proposes to change the presidential election system from a state-based federal system to a national popular vote system. NPV proponents contend states can implement the compact without federal governmental authorization. This article addresses the constitutional questions of whether the NPV must obtain Congress’s approval and whether Congress has the constitutional authority to grant such approval. In addressing these questions, I review U.S. Supreme Court precedents and constitutional history and find the NPV is the type of compact the Supreme Court would conclude requires congressional approval. Most importantly, I contend Congress is constitutionally unable …
A Constitution For An Enlarged Europe, Manuel Medina Ortega
A Constitution For An Enlarged Europe, Manuel Medina Ortega
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Powers Crisis: The Case Of Argentina, Manuel José J. García-Mansilla
Separation Of Powers Crisis: The Case Of Argentina, Manuel José J. García-Mansilla
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Hesburgh Lecture: Faith, Politics, And The Constitution: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State, Richard Garnett
Hesburgh Lecture: Faith, Politics, And The Constitution: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State, Richard Garnett
Faculty Lectures and Presentations
Rick Garnett delivered
Faith, Politics, and the Constitution: Understanding the Separation of Church and State
September 19, 2014
Hesburgh Lecture
Ares Auditorium
The University of Arizona
James E. Rogers College of Law
Tucson, Arizona
Are ‘We The People’ Meeting Our Responsibilities?, Alan E. Garfield
Are ‘We The People’ Meeting Our Responsibilities?, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity And Statutory Interpretation, Ilan Wurman
Qualified Immunity And Statutory Interpretation, Ilan Wurman
Seattle University Law Review
Before the 1989 case of Graham v. Connor, excessive force cases were pursued under either state law or the insuperable “shocks the conscience” test of the Fourteenth Amendment. Only after Graham did excessive force cases—now under the Fourth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983—inundate the federal courts, which had by then granted far-reaching immunities to officers for their constitutional torts. As a result of federal qualified immunity doctrine, which many states have adopted for themselves, excessive force cases rarely get to trial, plaintiffs often cannot recover, and courts struggle to find principled distinctions from one qualified immunity case to the …
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence, Roger Roots
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence, Roger Roots
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Public Law At The Cathedral: Enjoining The Government, Michael T. Morley
Public Law At The Cathedral: Enjoining The Government, Michael T. Morley
Scholarly Publications
Conventional wisdom provides that injunctive relief in public law cases is generally unnecessary, because a declaratory judgment and the threat of damages are enough to induce the government to comply with a court’s ruling (except, perhaps, in the institutional reform context). Consistent with this prevailing understanding, most scholars to apply Calabresi and Melamed’s Cathedral framework to public law have concluded that nearly all constitutional rights are protected by property rules, regardless of whether a rightholder actually is protected by an injunction, or instead merely has a substantial likelihood of obtaining one if she goes to court.
This Article challenges this …
Testimony Before The Committee On Energy And Commerce, Subcommittee On Environment And Economics, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing On Constitutional Considerations: States Vs. Federal Environmental Policy Implementation July 11, 2014, Rena I. Steinzor
Rena I. Steinzor
No abstract provided.
Belling The Partisan Cats: Preliminary Thoughts On Identifying And Mending A Dysfunctional Constitutional Order, Mark Graber
Belling The Partisan Cats: Preliminary Thoughts On Identifying And Mending A Dysfunctional Constitutional Order, Mark Graber
Mark Graber
This paper sharpens debates over whether the Constitution of the United States and the American constitutional order are presently dysfunctional, the nature of any dysfunctions, and how underlying regime flaws are likely to be corrected. Rather than focusing primarily on constitutional text, this Article explores the dynamic ways in which constitutional processes have influenced and been influenced by the structure of constitutional politics. Constitutional dysfunction is best conceptualized as the failure of a constitutional order rather than as a consequence of a flawed constitutional text, and dysfunction typically occurs when a regime is unable to transition from a dysfunctional constitutional …
Testimony Before The Committee On Energy And Commerce, Subcommittee On Environment And Economics, U.S. House Of Representatives, Hearing On Constitutional Considerations: States Vs. Federal Environmental Policy Implementation July 11, 2014, Rena I. Steinzor
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Professed Values, Constructive Interpretation, And Political History: Comments On Sotirios Barber, The Fallacies Of States' Rights, David B. Lyons
Professed Values, Constructive Interpretation, And Political History: Comments On Sotirios Barber, The Fallacies Of States' Rights, David B. Lyons
Faculty Scholarship
Our barely functioning Congress seems to embody the issues that this conference on constitutional dysfunction is meant to address. At this moment, however, congressional disarray may result less from institutional design than from our lasting heritage of white supremacy. Republican control of the House owes much to the party's Southern Strategy, which has exploited widespread dissatisfaction with the Democrats' official renunciation of racial stratification. That challenge to the American Way is exacerbated by the idea, outrageous to some, of a black President. That context has some bearing on this Symposium's topic of federalism. For, as Professor Larry Yackle reminds us, …
A Common Law Constitutionalism For The Right To Education, Scott R. Bauries
A Common Law Constitutionalism For The Right To Education, Scott R. Bauries
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article makes two claims, one descriptive and the other normative. The descriptive claim is that individual rights to education have not been realized under state constitutions because the currently dominant structure of education reform litigation prevents such realization. In state constitutional education clause claims, both pleadings and adjudication generally focus on the equality or adequacy of the system as a whole, rather than on any particular student's educational resources or attainment. The Article traces the roots of the currently dominant systemic approach, and finds these roots in federal institutional reform litigation. This systemic focus leads to a systemic, rather …
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation In The October 2005 Term, Martin Schwartz
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation In The October 2005 Term, Martin Schwartz
Martin A. Schwartz
No abstract provided.
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
State V. Brossart: Adapting The Fourth Amendment For A Future With Drones, Thomas Bryan
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Press Definition And The Religion Analogy, Ronnell Andersen Jones
Press Definition And The Religion Analogy, Ronnell Andersen Jones
Faculty Scholarship
n a Harvard Law Review Forum response to Professor Sonja West's symposium article, "Press Exceptionalism," Professor RonNell Andersen Jones critiques Professor West's effort to define "the press" for purposes of Press Clause exceptions and addresses the weaknesses of Professor West's analogy to Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC in drawing these definitional lines. The response highlights distinctions between Press Clause and Religion Clause jurisprudence and urges a more functional approach to press definition.
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Dred Scott: A Nightmare For The Originalists, Sol Wachtler
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arrestee Number Two, Who Are You? Suspicionless Dna Testing Of Pre-Trial Arrestees And The Fourth Amendment Implications, Lesley A. Hall
Arrestee Number Two, Who Are You? Suspicionless Dna Testing Of Pre-Trial Arrestees And The Fourth Amendment Implications, Lesley A. Hall
Missouri Law Review
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that DNA testing of pre-trial arrestees was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment as a routine booking procedure. The Court also held that DNA testing’s use for arrestee identification permitted its use as a tool to investigate suspicionless crimes. Part II analyzes the facts and holding of Maryland v. King. Part III discusses Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, including court-established tests used to ascertain whether a particular search is reasonable. Part IV examines the United States Supreme Court’s rationale in King, including Justice Scalia’s dissent, …
Nevada Public Policy And Higher Education: The Roles Of The Legislature And The Board Of Regents Under The Nevada Constitution, Thomas B. Mcaffee, Justin James Mcaffee
Nevada Public Policy And Higher Education: The Roles Of The Legislature And The Board Of Regents Under The Nevada Constitution, Thomas B. Mcaffee, Justin James Mcaffee
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.